NH-UMass Lowell/7 News Daily Tracking Poll Thread Head-to-Heads
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 05:54:31 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  NH-UMass Lowell/7 News Daily Tracking Poll Thread Head-to-Heads
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NH-UMass Lowell/7 News Daily Tracking Poll Thread Head-to-Heads  (Read 1778 times)
Sorenroy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,701
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -5.91

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 06, 2016, 12:13:08 PM »
« edited: February 07, 2016, 10:39:36 AM by Sorenroy »

Hello all, since it appears that the University of Massachusetts Lowell has made this a daily question I will be posting their New Hampshire matchups here. While we already have a thread like this for the primary matchups, we don't have one for the general election.
Here is the sister thread for those of you wondering: https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=227922.0

Anyway, conducted from 2/2/2016-2/4/2016 Here are the outdated polls released yesterday first.
http://www.uml.edu/docs/2-5%20TOPLINE%20-%20UMassLowell-7NEWS%20NH%20PRIMARY_tcm18-230845.pdf

Clinton v Trump:
Clinton — 44%
Trump — 40%

Clinton v Cruz:
Clinton — 44%
Cruz — 41%

Clinton v Rubio:

Rubio — 44%
Clinton — 41%

Sanders v Trump:
Sanders — 54%
Trump — 35%

Sanders v Cruz:
Sanders — 54%
Cruz — 33%

Sanders v Rubio:
Sanders — 51%
Rubio — 37%

And here are the matchups from the poll conducted 2/3/2016-2/5/2016.
http://www.uml.edu/docs/2-6%20TOPLINE%20-%20UMassLowell-7NEWS%20NH%20PRIMARY_tcm18-230852.pdf

Clinton v Trump:
Clinton — 46% (+2)
Trump — 39% (-1)

Clinton v Cruz:
Clinton — 46% (+2)
Cruz — 39% (-2)

Clinton v Rubio:
Rubio — 43% (-1)
Clinton — 42% (+1)

Sanders v Trump:
Sanders — 54% (No Change)
Trump — 34% (-1)

Sanders v Cruz:
Sanders — 57% (+3)
Cruz — 30% (-3)

Sanders v Rubio:
Sanders — 54% (+3)
Rubio — 35% (-2)

I will do further posts in their own posts, but I figured these should be in one by themselves because I haven't posted any yet.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,181
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 06, 2016, 02:11:12 PM »

Strong numbers for the Bern.

Just like in any swing state (when compared with Hillary).
Logged
Shadows
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,956
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 06, 2016, 03:12:34 PM »

Strong numbers for the Bern.

Just like in any swing state (when compared with Hillary).

NH will be a sweep with Bernie especially with those 15% Independents. If he wins 10% to 5% Republicans, it is 60-50%, full 10% Lead - A big win.
Logged
ProgressiveCanadian
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,690
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 06, 2016, 10:16:26 PM »

Strong numbers for the Bern.

Just like in any swing state (when compared with Hillary).
Logged
Sorenroy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,701
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -5.91

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 07, 2016, 10:34:05 AM »


I don't know how that stuff works. I'll enter the numbers in a separate post because I find it ascetically pleasing.

Also:


Again, I'm not sure how you are doing this, but they made two polls, one from 2/2/2016-2/4/2016 (the first part of my post) and one from 2/3/2016-2/5/2016. I don't know if you merged them into one or what, but they are technically two different polls.
Logged
Sorenroy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,701
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -5.91

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 07, 2016, 10:38:52 AM »

Daily Update!
Conducted from 2/4/2016-2/6/2016, here are today's polls.
http://www.uml.edu/docs/2-7%20TOPLINE%20-%20UMassLowell-7NEWS%20NH%20PRIMARY_tcm18-230859.pdf

Clinton v Trump:
Clinton — 45% (-1)
Trump — 39% (No Change)

Clinton v Cruz:
Clinton — 45% (-1)
Cruz — 39% (No Change)

Clinton v Rubio:

Rubio — 45% (+2)
Clinton — 40% (-2)

Sanders v Trump:
Sanders — 55% (+1)
Trump — 33% (-1)

Sanders v Cruz:
Sanders — 57% (No Change)
Cruz — 30% (No Change)

Sanders v Rubio:
Sanders — 55% (+1)
Rubio — 35% (No Change)
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 07, 2016, 02:02:36 PM »

Are we really doing daily trackers of general election match-ups for just one state before the conventions?
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,859
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 07, 2016, 08:13:50 PM »

I used only the latter (after the Iowa Caucuses) poll for my general map.
Logged
HAnnA MArin County
semocrat08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,041
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 08, 2016, 04:44:11 AM »

Oh, the giddy Bernie trolls posting all these polls out of New Hampshire, takes me back to 2008 Smiley the only poll out of New Hampshire that matters is the actual primary; until then, all polls are garbage (yes, even ones that show Hillary ahead, if there are any). Pollsters just shouldn't poll New Hampshire because it's a waste of time and money and utterly meaningless.

Regardless, here's how the media will spin the New Hampshire results:

Bernie wins: "OMG it's over! She's done! When is she going to drop out in the name of party unity?"

Hillary wins by 1-3 points: "Well, she won by a bigger margin in 2008, so her support here is clearly breaking."

Hillary wins by anywhere from 5-80 points: "Well, she's the inevitable nominee, but this is still a strong showing for Bernie Sanders and he is still a thorn in her side and will be throughout this entire primary process." 
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,720
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 08, 2016, 06:39:19 AM »
« Edited: February 08, 2016, 06:47:13 AM by Da-Jon »

Madam Secretary didnt have a strong primary challenge. There needs to be 2 challengers not one and Bernie isnt Biden that can nail down white working class older voters like Biden can. So, the leads that he had, except for NH better than Clinton, with GOP, wasnt that big of a deal.

But, good news, Virginia and Ohio still remain competetive, along with CO, any of these bellweathers put Clinton closer to 270.

TRUMP isnt Bush W that steamrolled Dems in 2000-2004 in Ohio.
Logged
Sorenroy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,701
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -5.91

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: February 08, 2016, 10:25:45 AM »

Last Daily Update (I think)! (they went by so quick, alas)
Conducted from 2/5/2016-2/7/2016, here are today's polls.
http://www.uml.edu/docs/2-8%20TOPLINE%20-%20UMassLowell-7NEWS%20NH%20PRIMARY_tcm18-230870.pdf

Clinton v Trump:
Clinton — 45% (No Change)
Trump — 40% (+1)

Clinton v Cruz:
Clinton — 45% (No Change)
Cruz — 40% (+1)

Clinton v Rubio:

Rubio — 44% (-1)
Clinton — 40% (No Change)

Sanders v Trump:
Sanders — 55% (No Change)
Trump — 34% (+1)

Sanders v Cruz:
Sanders —56% (-1)
Cruz — 31% (+1)

Sanders v Rubio:
Sanders — 54% (-1)
Rubio — 34% (-1)
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.056 seconds with 13 queries.