GA-6 Special election discussion thread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 08:33:56 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  GA-6 Special election discussion thread (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: GA-6 Special election discussion thread  (Read 250662 times)
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,283
United States


« on: April 19, 2017, 12:21:19 AM »

Yep.

Research shows that special elections are more in line with the most recent presidential vote than with the most recent house race.

Probably true, but that's definitely not going to be the case in Montana.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,283
United States


« Reply #1 on: April 20, 2017, 06:59:48 AM »
« Edited: April 20, 2017, 07:10:52 AM by MT Treasurer »

I agree that GA will go the way of VA, and this should happen very quickly. By 2030 or so, MS, LA and maybe NC could all lean D and TX and FL (and maybe SC) would be pure Tossups or lean D. The Democratic Party's base will be in the South.

Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,283
United States


« Reply #2 on: May 03, 2017, 07:11:14 AM »

I don't like the optics of winning GA-06 but not Montana

Democrats always troubled by what they were/are/becoming. Tongue

I don't necessarily disagree, but Quist could have won this race without breaking a sweat had he actually run a good campaign. Tongue In fact, Republicans should be glad that (a) he turned out to be a poor candidate and (b) that Gianforte has run a decent campaign. But like Figueira said, the race certainly isn't over yet, and I'd still rate it Tossup/Tilt R given the high floor Quist has.

My point about internal polls not always being wrong stands. Ossoff at 48% and Handel at 47% isn't implausible, especially if the undecideds are Republican-leaning Independents. Like Bacon and Castro said, I'm sure this was released to motivate Ossoff supporters and donors and not get complacent.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,283
United States


« Reply #3 on: May 05, 2017, 05:49:39 PM »


Wow. I still think this will go down to the wire, though.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,283
United States


« Reply #4 on: May 06, 2017, 10:11:10 PM »


https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=250974.0
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=249194.0

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=201912.0
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=201571.0

Doesn't strike me as very Republican-leaning.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,283
United States


« Reply #5 on: May 07, 2017, 06:28:36 PM »

Well it should be pointed out Landmark Communications polled Ossoff really under

Take a look at the RCP average. While they did have Ossoff at 45%, they were still the most accurate pollster.

I agree with GeorgiaModerate. This is a MoE race.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,283
United States


« Reply #6 on: May 14, 2017, 11:24:48 AM »

Why isn't Handel leading with numbers like these?

Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,283
United States


« Reply #7 on: May 14, 2017, 07:48:19 PM »

Yeah, after all that money, attention and hype the party that loses this race by 1 or 2 points is going to be very disappointed, to say the least.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,283
United States


« Reply #8 on: May 20, 2017, 01:36:31 PM »

Actually, most networks had ND and IN as Tossups on election day, and IN was definitely considered to be in play. For some reason, McCain did significantly better in ND than predicted, though. Maybe the polling there just sucked.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,283
United States


« Reply #9 on: May 21, 2017, 10:00:37 PM »

So what would the GA posters say is the most likely outcome right now? I think there's a good chance that it will go down to the wire, but the momentum is probably with Ossoff, right? I'm beginning to think that Republicans might be wasting a ton of money here and that the race has basically already been decided in Ossoff's favor.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,283
United States


« Reply #10 on: May 22, 2017, 03:59:40 PM »

WHOA

SurveyUSA poll of GA-6: Ossoff +7 (!)

Jon Ossoff - 51%
Karen Handel - 44%
Undecided - 6%

http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReport.aspx?g=e944d747-cc05-4608-90db-ed0527267059

Yeah, like I said...

I'm beginning to think that Republicans might be wasting a ton of money here and that the race has basically already been decided in Ossoff's favor.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,283
United States


« Reply #11 on: May 24, 2017, 08:45:03 PM »

No that's what I mean Ossoff has been "touch me see me feel me" all over the place

As long as he doesn't take this literally....
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,283
United States


« Reply #12 on: May 26, 2017, 01:06:57 AM »

Oh God, not McDonald again. I'm getting 2016 flashbacks from this.

That being said, Ossoff should win 51-49 or so. This is not the same as MT.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,283
United States


« Reply #13 on: May 26, 2017, 06:49:10 PM »

How much is Ossoff expected to win the early vote by? And what margin does Handel need with election day voters in order to win? I assume things here aren't as complicated in Montana.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,283
United States


« Reply #14 on: June 01, 2017, 05:00:55 PM »

This is probably a stupid question, but why is the early vote in GA-06 generally Republican-leaning? Didn't Ossoff win it in a landslide in April?
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,283
United States


« Reply #15 on: June 19, 2017, 03:49:33 PM »

Ossoff has ran a great campaign and was a very good candidate. Regardless of how this race turns out or your political views you have to admit that.

No, he's a prop-up if he loses. A prop-up who ate money that could've gone to TWO districts that were competitive, one of which had a +20 edge against and moved left by 14!

A handsome looking one, but still a prop-up.

1.) Quist really was an uninspiring candidate who ran a pretty awful campaign. Ossoff is obviously a better candidate, and Handel's campaign strikes me as significantly worse-run than Gianforte's.
2.) Comparing the results of a special Cogressional election with the 2016 presidential results, especially in a state like Montana, is incredibly misleading.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.039 seconds with 11 queries.