Home
2012
Election Results
Election Info
Weblog
Wiki
Search
Email
Site Info
Store
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
June 20, 2013, 03:26:17 am
News:
Please delete your old personal messages.
Atlas Forum
Election Archive
2010 Elections
2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
(Moderator:
Joe Republic
)
Kasich Closes on Strickland
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
Author
Topic: Kasich Closes on Strickland (Read 1581 times)
Rowan
RowanBrandon
YaBB God
Posts: 6701
Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70
Kasich Closes on Strickland
«
on:
July 03, 2009, 06:05:15 am »
Quinnipiac OH-GOV
Strickland 43%
Kasich 38%
Looks like PPP was onto something with their poll.
Stricklands approvals are down to 46/42, they were 57/29 in May.
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1322.xml?ReleaseID=1346
Logged
Jayhawker
tmthforu94
YaBB God
Posts: 16085
Re: Kasich Closes on Strickland
«
Reply #1 on:
July 03, 2009, 09:16:27 am »
It also has Strickland only beating Dewine, 41-40%. And in the primary battle between Dewine and Kasich, Kasich only leads by 3, 35-32%.
Logged
A life is not important except in the impact it has on other lives.
-Jackie Robinson
Quote from: John_Engle on November 02, 2012, 04:25:37 pm
Tmthforu94
You are very kind my Friend. Thank you and God bless the people like You.
Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
YaBB God
Posts: 21445
Political Matrix
E: 4.45, S: 3.22
Re: Kasich Closes on Strickland
«
Reply #2 on:
July 03, 2009, 10:29:42 am »
Quote from: Bayh! `10 on July 03, 2009, 09:16:27 am
It also has Strickland only beating Dewine, 41-40%. And in the primary battle between Dewine and Kasich, Kasich only leads by 3, 35-32%.
DeWine sucks, he ran poor campaign in 2006 and he let himself get dragged down with Bob Taft. Kasich is doing well this far out and all those that said that Strickland was safe, that he will win reelection in a landslide, I just have to say, I told you so.
Logged
He's BACK!!! His Time Has Come Once Again!
Now We're All Gonna Die! No One is Safe From His Wrath!
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 28265
Political Matrix
E: -7.23, S: -5.39
Re: Kasich Closes on Strickland
«
Reply #3 on:
July 03, 2009, 12:55:34 pm »
Strange to see Strickland's approvals slide by these margins in just a month. It's not like the economy wasn't bad before as well ... Or did he do something unpopular I´m not aware of ?
Logged
Badger
badger
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 8597
Re: Kasich Closes on Strickland
«
Reply #4 on:
July 03, 2009, 06:43:40 pm »
Quote from: Tender Branson on July 03, 2009, 12:55:34 pm
Strange to see Strickland's approvals slide by these margins in just a month. It's not like the economy wasn't bad before as well ... Or did he do something unpopular I´m not aware of ?
First biannual budget was passed by acclimation--almost unheard of. Due to the economy this year's is turning VERY ugly. Strickland came outwith a budget promising a nearly 50% cut in state library funding.
Of course Kasich will solve this easily with his proposal to eliminate the state income tax. Because people will have more money to spend which will stimulate businesses and economic growth which will increase tax revenue collected...hey, wait a minute. I think I just found a flaw in Kasich's clever economic plan.
Logged
Padfoot
padfoot714
YaBB God
Posts: 4418
Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: -6.96
Re: Kasich Closes on Strickland
«
Reply #5 on:
July 04, 2009, 12:37:11 am »
Quote from: badger on July 03, 2009, 06:43:40 pm
Quote from: Tender Branson on July 03, 2009, 12:55:34 pm
Strange to see Strickland's approvals slide by these margins in just a month. It's not like the economy wasn't bad before as well ... Or did he do something unpopular I´m not aware of ?
First biannual budget was passed by acclimation--almost unheard of. Due to the economy this year's is turning VERY ugly. Strickland came outwith a budget promising a nearly 50% cut in state library funding.
The budget battle is probably the biggest issue right now and its looking bad. Strickland also did a complete 180 on gambling. He ran on a position of being against all forms of gambling but since being elected he's expanded the state lottery to include keno and now he wants to authorize slot machines at race tracks in order to raise nearly $1 billion to prevent more budget cuts.
The Republicans really aren't helping themselves either though. They control the state Senate and they're being obstructionist without offering any sort of compromise or alternatives. They just keep balking at everything the Dems propose but they never offer any of their own ideas. Its all childish bullsh**t.
Logged
Badger
badger
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 8597
Re: Kasich Closes on Strickland
«
Reply #6 on:
July 08, 2009, 01:33:39 pm »
Quote from: Padfoot on July 04, 2009, 12:37:11 am
Quote from: badger on July 03, 2009, 06:43:40 pm
Quote from: Tender Branson on July 03, 2009, 12:55:34 pm
Strange to see Strickland's approvals slide by these margins in just a month. It's not like the economy wasn't bad before as well ... Or did he do something unpopular I´m not aware of ?
First biannual budget was passed by acclimation--almost unheard of. Due to the economy this year's is turning VERY ugly. Strickland came outwith a budget promising a nearly 50% cut in state library funding.
The budget battle is probably the biggest issue right now and its looking bad. Strickland also did a complete 180 on gambling. He ran on a position of being against all forms of gambling but since being elected he's expanded the state lottery to include keno and now he wants to authorize slot machines at race tracks in order to raise nearly $1 billion to prevent more budget cuts.
The Republicans really aren't helping themselves either though. They control the state Senate and they're being obstructionist without offering any sort of compromise or alternatives. They just keep balking at everything the Dems propose but they never offer any of their own ideas. Its all childish bullsh**t.
Sadly, I'm not sure most voters will hold individual GOP state senators as accountable for the senate's intransigence and lack of an alternative as they will take Strickland to task for "lack of leadership" (i.e. making the state's massive budget woes disappear without painful cuts in services or increased taxes). It's notable how silent John Kasich is being. He's probably praying that no one in the media will press him on his own proposal for the budget so he can criticize Strickland endlessly next year for the inevitable hard decisions coming, and blithely claim he would've somehow done it better ("cutting wasteful spending, etc.).
I used to think my state rep was
the
stupidest man in Ohio for proposing elimination of the state income tax, the source of about half of government revenue, without proposing replacement source of revenue on the quaint theory that resulting economic growth will replace about 50% of the state treasury.
Apparently I was wrong; my state rep has at least one competitor in the pinhead competition....
http://www.clevelandjewishnews.com/articles/2009/07/02/news/local/doc4a4a665bed3e7687599032.txt
And eliminating the state inheritance tax too. Nice. Somebody peel this guy off the billionaire's jocks, please.
Logged
Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
YaBB God
Posts: 21445
Political Matrix
E: 4.45, S: 3.22
Re: Kasich Closes on Strickland
«
Reply #7 on:
July 08, 2009, 04:20:55 pm »
Quote from: badger on July 08, 2009, 01:33:39 pm
Quote from: Padfoot on July 04, 2009, 12:37:11 am
Quote from: badger on July 03, 2009, 06:43:40 pm
Quote from: Tender Branson on July 03, 2009, 12:55:34 pm
Strange to see Strickland's approvals slide by these margins in just a month. It's not like the economy wasn't bad before as well ... Or did he do something unpopular I´m not aware of ?
First biannual budget was passed by acclimation--almost unheard of. Due to the economy this year's is turning VERY ugly. Strickland came outwith a budget promising a nearly 50% cut in state library funding.
The budget battle is probably the biggest issue right now and its looking bad. Strickland also did a complete 180 on gambling. He ran on a position of being against all forms of gambling but since being elected he's expanded the state lottery to include keno and now he wants to authorize slot machines at race tracks in order to raise nearly $1 billion to prevent more budget cuts.
The Republicans really aren't helping themselves either though. They control the state Senate and they're being obstructionist without offering any sort of compromise or alternatives. They just keep balking at everything the Dems propose but they never offer any of their own ideas. Its all childish bullsh**t.
Sadly, I'm not sure most voters will hold individual GOP state senators as accountable for the senate's intransigence and lack of an alternative as they will take Strickland to task for "lack of leadership" (i.e. making the state's massive budget woes disappear without painful cuts in services or increased taxes). It's notable how silent John Kasich is being. He's probably praying that no one in the media will press him on his own proposal for the budget so he can criticize Strickland endlessly next year for the inevitable hard decisions coming, and blithely claim he would've somehow done it better ("cutting wasteful spending, etc.).
I used to think my state rep was
the
stupidest man in Ohio for proposing elimination of the state income tax, the source of about half of government revenue, without proposing replacement source of revenue on the quaint theory that resulting economic growth will replace about 50% of the state treasury.
Apparently I was wrong; my state rep has at least one competitor in the pinhead competition....
http://www.clevelandjewishnews.com/articles/2009/07/02/news/local/doc4a4a665bed3e7687599032.txt
And eliminating the state inheritance tax too. Nice. Somebody peel this guy off the billionaire's jocks, please.
Considering the States that don't have an state income tax are doing much better then the ones that due, I would openly suggest it as option to turnaround the economy in the States like Ohio and California. The problem is making up for the lost revenue. I say legalise gambling is the first place to start. Of course it is not enough and you don't want to cut essential services like Education.
Logged
He's BACK!!! His Time Has Come Once Again!
Now We're All Gonna Die! No One is Safe From His Wrath!
Badger
badger
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 8597
Re: Kasich Closes on Strickland
«
Reply #8 on:
July 13, 2009, 12:21:34 pm »
Quote from: Senator North Carolina Yankee on July 08, 2009, 04:20:55 pm
Quote from: badger on July 08, 2009, 01:33:39 pm
Quote from: Padfoot on July 04, 2009, 12:37:11 am
Quote from: badger on July 03, 2009, 06:43:40 pm
Quote from: Tender Branson on July 03, 2009, 12:55:34 pm
Strange to see Strickland's approvals slide by these margins in just a month. It's not like the economy wasn't bad before as well ... Or did he do something unpopular I´m not aware of ?
First biannual budget was passed by acclimation--almost unheard of. Due to the economy this year's is turning VERY ugly. Strickland came outwith a budget promising a nearly 50% cut in state library funding.
The budget battle is probably the biggest issue right now and its looking bad. Strickland also did a complete 180 on gambling. He ran on a position of being against all forms of gambling but since being elected he's expanded the state lottery to include keno and now he wants to authorize slot machines at race tracks in order to raise nearly $1 billion to prevent more budget cuts.
The Republicans really aren't helping themselves either though. They control the state Senate and they're being obstructionist without offering any sort of compromise or alternatives. They just keep balking at everything the Dems propose but they never offer any of their own ideas. Its all childish bullsh**t.
Sadly, I'm not sure most voters will hold individual GOP state senators as accountable for the senate's intransigence and lack of an alternative as they will take Strickland to task for "lack of leadership" (i.e. making the state's massive budget woes disappear without painful cuts in services or increased taxes). It's notable how silent John Kasich is being. He's probably praying that no one in the media will press him on his own proposal for the budget so he can criticize Strickland endlessly next year for the inevitable hard decisions coming, and blithely claim he would've somehow done it better ("cutting wasteful spending, etc.).
I used to think my state rep was
the
stupidest man in Ohio for proposing elimination of the state income tax, the source of about half of government revenue, without proposing replacement source of revenue on the quaint theory that resulting economic growth will replace about 50% of the state treasury.
Apparently I was wrong; my state rep has at least one competitor in the pinhead competition....
http://www.clevelandjewishnews.com/articles/2009/07/02/news/local/doc4a4a665bed3e7687599032.txt
And eliminating the state inheritance tax too. Nice. Somebody peel this guy off the billionaire's jocks, please.
Considering the States that don't have an state income tax are doing much better then the ones that due, I would openly suggest it as option to turnaround the economy in the States like Ohio and California. The problem is making up for the lost revenue. I say legalise gambling is the first place to start. Of course it is not enough and you don't want to cut essential services like Education.
How are states that rely more on sales taxes doing compared to heavily income tax reliant states? I imagine the recession is affecting both worse than other states more reliant on (e.g.) property taxes and other sources of revenue that are more insulated from downturns in the economy. While I agree with you 110%, NCYank, that gambling should be allowed to help plug the budget gap instead of even deeper cuts in education, proposing elimination of the income tax
with no proposal for replacing the
50%
loss in state revenue
other than "increased economic growth" is either jaw-droppingly foolish or grossly irresponsible. From his record in congress as a hardcore supply-sider I'm not entirely sure which category Kasich falls into, but I will "charitably" say the latter.
Logged
Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
YaBB God
Posts: 21445
Political Matrix
E: 4.45, S: 3.22
Re: Kasich Closes on Strickland
«
Reply #9 on:
July 13, 2009, 06:15:48 pm »
Quote from: badger on July 13, 2009, 12:21:34 pm
Quote from: Senator North Carolina Yankee on July 08, 2009, 04:20:55 pm
Quote from: badger on July 08, 2009, 01:33:39 pm
Quote from: Padfoot on July 04, 2009, 12:37:11 am
Quote from: badger on July 03, 2009, 06:43:40 pm
Quote from: Tender Branson on July 03, 2009, 12:55:34 pm
Strange to see Strickland's approvals slide by these margins in just a month. It's not like the economy wasn't bad before as well ... Or did he do something unpopular I´m not aware of ?
First biannual budget was passed by acclimation--almost unheard of. Due to the economy this year's is turning VERY ugly. Strickland came outwith a budget promising a nearly 50% cut in state library funding.
The budget battle is probably the biggest issue right now and its looking bad. Strickland also did a complete 180 on gambling. He ran on a position of being against all forms of gambling but since being elected he's expanded the state lottery to include keno and now he wants to authorize slot machines at race tracks in order to raise nearly $1 billion to prevent more budget cuts.
The Republicans really aren't helping themselves either though. They control the state Senate and they're being obstructionist without offering any sort of compromise or alternatives. They just keep balking at everything the Dems propose but they never offer any of their own ideas. Its all childish bullsh**t.
Sadly, I'm not sure most voters will hold individual GOP state senators as accountable for the senate's intransigence and lack of an alternative as they will take Strickland to task for "lack of leadership" (i.e. making the state's massive budget woes disappear without painful cuts in services or increased taxes). It's notable how silent John Kasich is being. He's probably praying that no one in the media will press him on his own proposal for the budget so he can criticize Strickland endlessly next year for the inevitable hard decisions coming, and blithely claim he would've somehow done it better ("cutting wasteful spending, etc.).
I used to think my state rep was
the
stupidest man in Ohio for proposing elimination of the state income tax, the source of about half of government revenue, without proposing replacement source of revenue on the quaint theory that resulting economic growth will replace about 50% of the state treasury.
Apparently I was wrong; my state rep has at least one competitor in the pinhead competition....
http://www.clevelandjewishnews.com/articles/2009/07/02/news/local/doc4a4a665bed3e7687599032.txt
And eliminating the state inheritance tax too. Nice. Somebody peel this guy off the billionaire's jocks, please.
Considering the States that don't have an state income tax are doing much better then the ones that due, I would openly suggest it as option to turnaround the economy in the States like Ohio and California. The problem is making up for the lost revenue. I say legalise gambling is the first place to start. Of course it is not enough and you don't want to cut essential services like Education.
How are states that rely more on sales taxes doing compared to heavily income tax reliant states? I imagine the recession is affecting both worse than other states more reliant on
(e.g.) property taxes and other sources of revenue that are more insulated from downturns in the economy
. While I agree with you 110%, NCYank, that gambling should be allowed to help plug the budget gap instead of even deeper cuts in education, proposing elimination of the income tax
with no proposal for replacing the
50%
loss in state revenue
other than "increased economic growth" is either jaw-droppingly foolish or grossly irresponsible. From his record in congress as a hardcore supply-sider I'm not entirely sure which category Kasich falls into, but I will "charitably" say the latter.
OF course in a perfect world I would advocate elimination of both the State Income and Sales Tax however recouping the costs would be almost impossible. Most states enacted the Income tax to improve there education systems, and I would be opposed to cutting them down drastically. Also I do beleive, badger, that I said removing the Income tax without recouping the money somehow would be irresponsible.
Logged
He's BACK!!! His Time Has Come Once Again!
Now We're All Gonna Die! No One is Safe From His Wrath!
Pages:
[
1
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections
===> 2013 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
Questions and Answers
-----------------------------
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Electoral Reform
===> Polling
=> The Atlas
===> How To
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> 2012 Elections
===> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 House Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2010 Elections
===> 2010 House Election Polls
===> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2008 Elections
===> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
=> 2006 Elections
===> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliment
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> Interactive Timelines
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Powered by SMF 1.1.18
|
SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Loading...