Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Adams	Fisher	24.0%
	Portman	73.2%
	Pryce	1.0%
	Other	1.8%

Allen	Fisher	28.8%
	Portman	68.0%
	Pryce	1.0%
	Other	2.1%

Ashland	Fisher	24.4%
	Portman	70.9%
	Pryce	1.5%
	Other	3.2%

Ashtabula	Fisher	42.7%
	Portman	51.0%
	Pryce	2.5%
	Other	3.8%

Athens	Fisher	59.3%
	Portman	34.9%
	Pryce	1.9%
	Other	3.9%

Auglaize	Fisher	19.5%
	Portman	76.5%
	Pryce	1.3%
	Other	2.7%

Belmont	Fisher	47.0%
	Portman	48.9%
	Pryce	1.1%
	Other	3.0%

Brown	Fisher	23.2%
	Portman	74.0%
	Pryce	0.8%
	Other	2.0%

Butler	Fisher	26.6%
	Portman	70.4%
	Pryce	0.8%
	Other	2.3%

Carroll	Fisher	34.9%
	Portman	59.7%
	Pryce	1.9%
	Other	3.5%

Champaign	Fisher	26.9%
	Portman	68.9%
	Pryce	1.3%
	Other	2.9%

Clark	Fisher	36.5%
	Portman	59.7%
	Pryce	1.2%
	Other	2.5%

Clermont	Fisher	19.4%
	Portman	77.6%
	Pryce	0.8%
	Other	2.2%

Clinton	Fisher	20.7%
	Portman	75.7%
	Pryce	1.0%
	Other	2.6%

Columbiana	Fisher	36.8%
	Portman	58.3%
	Pryce	1.7%
	Other	3.1%

Coshocton	Fisher	34.2%
	Portman	60.2%
	Pryce	2.0%
	Other	3.6%

Crawford	Fisher	28.0%
	Portman	66.6%
	Pryce	1.9%
	Other	3.6%

Cuyahoga	Fisher	56.6%
	Portman	40.3%
	Pryce	1.1%
	Other	2.0%

Darke	Fisher	20.7%
	Portman	75.0%
	Pryce	1.4%
	Other	3.0%

Defiance	Fisher	31.6%
	Portman	63.6%
	Pryce	1.3%
	Other	3.4%

Delaware	Fisher	26.2%
	Portman	70.7%
	Pryce	1.2%
	Other	1.9%

Erie	Fisher	43.0%
	Portman	53.4%
	Pryce	1.1%
	Other	2.5%

Fairfield	Fisher	28.7%
	Portman	66.7%
	Pryce	2.0%
	Other	2.6%

Fayette	Fisher	24.8%
	Portman	70.5%
	Pryce	2.2%
	Other	2.4%

Franklin	Fisher	46.9%
	Portman	49.1%
	Pryce	1.7%
	Other	2.3%

Fulton	Fisher	29.7%
	Portman	66.2%
	Pryce	1.2%
	Other	2.8%

Gallia	Fisher	34.1%
	Portman	62.3%
	Pryce	1.2%
	Other	2.5%

Geauga	Fisher	28.6%
	Portman	67.9%
	Pryce	1.1%
	Other	2.3%

Greene	Fisher	28.8%
	Portman	67.7%
	Pryce	0.9%
	Other	2.6%

Guernsey	Fisher	35.0%
	Portman	60.0%
	Pryce	1.8%
	Other	3.3%

Hamilton	Fisher	39.6%
	Portman	58.2%
	Pryce	0.4%
	Other	1.8%

Hancock	Fisher	22.8%
	Portman	73.4%
	Pryce	1.2%
	Other	2.6%

Hardin	Fisher	28.0%
	Portman	66.6%
	Pryce	2.3%
	Other	3.0%

Harrison	Fisher	43.4%
	Portman	51.5%
	Pryce	1.3%
	Other	3.8%

Henry	Fisher	26.8%
	Portman	69.4%
	Pryce	1.0%
	Other	2.7%

Highland	Fisher	23.5%
	Portman	72.1%
	Pryce	1.4%
	Other	3.0%

Hocking	Fisher	36.6%
	Portman	57.3%
	Pryce	2.3%
	Other	3.9%

Holmes	Fisher	18.2%
	Portman	77.0%
	Pryce	1.5%
	Other	3.3%

Huron	Fisher	31.4%
	Portman	64.0%
	Pryce	1.6%
	Other	3.0%

Jackson	Fisher	34.0%
	Portman	61.3%
	Pryce	1.8%
	Other	3.0%

Jefferson	Fisher	46.4%
	Portman	49.4%
	Pryce	1.6%
	Other	2.7%

Knox	Fisher	26.2%
	Portman	68.0%
	Pryce	1.8%
	Other	4.1%

Lake	Fisher	36.1%
	Portman	60.2%
	Pryce	1.2%
	Other	2.5%

Lawrence	Fisher	38.9%
	Portman	57.7%
	Pryce	1.1%
	Other	2.3%

Licking	Fisher	29.5%
	Portman	65.2%
	Pryce	2.2%
	Other	3.0%

Logan	Fisher	21.0%
	Portman	73.2%
	Pryce	2.9%
	Other	2.8%

Lorain	Fisher	44.4%
	Portman	51.3%
	Pryce	1.3%
	Other	3.0%

Lucas	Fisher	52.7%
	Portman	44.5%
	Pryce	0.8%
	Other	2.1%

Madison	Fisher	24.9%
	Portman	69.8%
	Pryce	2.6%
	Other	2.7%

Mahoning	Fisher	56.8%
	Portman	39.5%
	Pryce	1.4%
	Other	2.3%

Marion	Fisher	31.3%
	Portman	62.2%
	Pryce	2.6%
	Other	3.8%

Medina	Fisher	31.3%
	Portman	65.0%
	Pryce	1.3%
	Other	2.4%

Meigs	Fisher	36.5%
	Portman	59.3%
	Pryce	1.6%
	Other	2.6%

Mercer	Fisher	19.6%
	Portman	76.4%
	Pryce	1.2%
	Other	2.9%

Miami	Fisher	23.0%
	Portman	73.5%
	Pryce	1.2%
	Other	2.4%

Monroe	Fisher	52.0%
	Portman	43.9%
	Pryce	1.9%
	Other	2.3%

Montgomery	Fisher	41.5%
	Portman	55.5%
	Pryce	0.9%
	Other	2.0%

Morgan	Fisher	34.0%
	Portman	61.1%
	Pryce	1.9%
	Other	3.0%

Morrow	Fisher	25.2%
	Portman	68.6%
	Pryce	2.3%
	Other	3.9%

Muskingum	Fisher	32.8%
	Portman	62.6%
	Pryce	1.6%
	Other	3.0%

Noble	Fisher	36.1%
	Portman	58.5%
	Pryce	2.6%
	Other	2.8%

Ottawa	Fisher	38.7%
	Portman	58.1%
	Pryce	1.2%
	Other	2.0%

Paulding	Fisher	33.3%
	Portman	62.0%
	Pryce	1.4%
	Other	3.3%

Perry	Fisher	36.1%
	Portman	58.7%
	Pryce	2.1%
	Other	3.1%

Pickaway	Fisher	28.0%
	Portman	66.7%
	Pryce	2.7%
	Other	2.6%

Pike	Fisher	42.8%
	Portman	53.4%
	Pryce	1.4%
	Other	2.3%

Portage	Fisher	38.5%
	Portman	54.1%
	Pryce	4.1%
	Other	3.3%

Preble	Fisher	22.9%
	Portman	71.9%
	Pryce	1.3%
	Other	3.9%

Putnam	Fisher	21.5%
	Portman	75.4%
	Pryce	1.3%
	Other	1.9%

Richland	Fisher	31.8%
	Portman	63.3%
	Pryce	1.3%
	Other	3.5%

Ross	Fisher	36.7%
	Portman	58.3%
	Pryce	2.3%
	Other	2.6%

Sandusky	Fisher	34.4%
	Portman	60.8%
	Pryce	1.4%
	Other	3.4%

Scioto	Fisher	41.5%
	Portman	56.1%
	Pryce	0.8%
	Other	1.6%

Seneca	Fisher	32.4%
	Portman	62.5%
	Pryce	1.5%
	Other	3.7%

Shelby	Fisher	21.0%
	Portman	75.2%
	Pryce	1.3%
	Other	2.5%

Stark	Fisher	39.1%
	Portman	57.1%
	Pryce	1.4%
	Other	2.4%

Summit	Fisher	46.5%
	Portman	49.9%
	Pryce	1.4%
	Other	2.2%

Trumbull	Fisher	52.5%
	Portman	43.0%
	Pryce	1.8%
	Other	2.8%

Tuscarawas	Fisher	38.1%
	Portman	57.4%
	Pryce	1.4%
	Other	3.1%

Union	Fisher	21.6%
	Portman	73.4%
	Pryce	2.3%
	Other	2.7%

Van Wert	Fisher	23.4%
	Portman	72.3%
	Pryce	1.4%
	Other	2.8%

Vinton	Fisher	40.8%
	Portman	53.9%
	Pryce	1.9%
	Other	3.3%

Warren	Fisher	20.6%
	Portman	76.7%
	Pryce	0.7%
	Other	2.0%

Washington	Fisher	36.2%
	Portman	59.8%
	Pryce	1.5%
	Other	2.5%

Wayne	Fisher	28.3%
	Portman	67.5%
	Pryce	1.3%
	Other	3.0%

Williams	Fisher	28.4%
	Portman	67.4%
	Pryce	1.4%
	Other	2.8%

Wood	Fisher	38.1%
	Portman	58.1%
	Pryce	1.2%
	Other	2.7%

Wyandot	Fisher	25.6%
	Portman	69.6%
	Pryce	1.7%
	Other	3.2%

National DataGraph for 2010 - Ohio Results for 2010

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved