Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2016-12-04

Map

Map

Alamance	Renfrow	51.8%
	Hicks	48.2%

Alexander	Renfrow	40.1%
	Hicks	59.9%

Alleghany	Renfrow	55.2%
	Hicks	44.8%

Anson	Renfrow	77.5%
	Hicks	22.5%

Ashe	Renfrow	46.4%
	Hicks	53.6%

Avery	Renfrow	28.8%
	Hicks	71.2%

Beaufort	Renfrow	60.4%
	Hicks	39.6%

Bertie	Renfrow	78.9%
	Hicks	21.1%

Bladen	Renfrow	62.3%
	Hicks	37.7%

Brunswick	Renfrow	56.0%
	Hicks	44.0%

Buncombe	Renfrow	51.6%
	Hicks	48.4%

Burke	Renfrow	48.0%
	Hicks	52.0%

Cabarrus	Renfrow	42.0%
	Hicks	58.0%

Caldwell	Renfrow	40.8%
	Hicks	59.2%

Camden	Renfrow	69.0%
	Hicks	31.0%

Carteret	Renfrow	50.0%
	Hicks	50.0%

Caswell	Renfrow	70.4%
	Hicks	29.6%

Catawba	Renfrow	37.1%
	Hicks	62.9%

Chatham	Renfrow	62.7%
	Hicks	37.3%

Cherokee	Renfrow	43.5%
	Hicks	56.5%

Chowan	Renfrow	67.4%
	Hicks	32.6%

Clay	Renfrow	43.0%
	Hicks	57.0%

Cleveland	Renfrow	56.7%
	Hicks	43.3%

Columbus	Renfrow	70.1%
	Hicks	29.9%

Craven	Renfrow	55.5%
	Hicks	44.5%

Cumberland	Renfrow	62.2%
	Hicks	37.8%

Currituck	Renfrow	62.3%
	Hicks	37.7%

Dare	Renfrow	51.7%
	Hicks	48.3%

Davidson	Renfrow	39.2%
	Hicks	60.8%

Davie	Renfrow	36.6%
	Hicks	63.4%

Duplin	Renfrow	67.0%
	Hicks	33.0%

Durham	Renfrow	69.3%
	Hicks	30.7%

Edgecombe	Renfrow	73.6%
	Hicks	26.4%

Forsyth	Renfrow	52.9%
	Hicks	47.1%

Franklin	Renfrow	73.1%
	Hicks	26.9%

Gaston	Renfrow	41.5%
	Hicks	58.5%

Gates	Renfrow	81.5%
	Hicks	18.5%

Graham	Renfrow	45.8%
	Hicks	54.2%

Granville	Renfrow	71.1%
	Hicks	28.9%

Greene	Renfrow	73.5%
	Hicks	26.5%

Guilford	Renfrow	52.0%
	Hicks	48.0%

Halifax	Renfrow	73.9%
	Hicks	26.1%

Harnett	Renfrow	62.2%
	Hicks	37.8%

Haywood	Renfrow	59.4%
	Hicks	40.6%

Henderson	Renfrow	36.1%
	Hicks	63.9%

Hertford	Renfrow	76.5%
	Hicks	23.5%

Hoke	Renfrow	78.6%
	Hicks	21.4%

Hyde	Renfrow	71.1%
	Hicks	28.9%

Iredell	Renfrow	45.3%
	Hicks	54.7%

Jackson	Renfrow	54.9%
	Hicks	45.1%

Johnston	Renfrow	63.5%
	Hicks	36.5%

Jones	Renfrow	69.2%
	Hicks	30.8%

Lee	Renfrow	58.6%
	Hicks	41.4%

Lenoir	Renfrow	62.9%
	Hicks	37.1%

Lincoln	Renfrow	44.4%
	Hicks	55.6%

McDowell	Renfrow	51.3%
	Hicks	48.7%

Macon	Renfrow	48.0%
	Hicks	52.0%

Madison	Renfrow	55.9%
	Hicks	44.1%

Martin	Renfrow	75.7%
	Hicks	24.3%

Mecklenburg	Renfrow	48.9%
	Hicks	51.1%

Mitchell	Renfrow	26.9%
	Hicks	73.1%

Montgomery	Renfrow	58.0%
	Hicks	42.0%

Moore	Renfrow	46.4%
	Hicks	53.6%

Nash	Renfrow	60.2%
	Hicks	39.8%

New Hanover	Renfrow	51.6%
	Hicks	48.4%

Northampton	Renfrow	78.7%
	Hicks	21.3%

Onslow	Renfrow	52.3%
	Hicks	47.7%

Orange	Renfrow	69.7%
	Hicks	30.3%

Pamlico	Renfrow	66.1%
	Hicks	33.9%

Pasquotank	Renfrow	65.1%
	Hicks	34.9%

Pender	Renfrow	64.5%
	Hicks	35.5%

Perquimans	Renfrow	68.2%
	Hicks	31.8%

Person	Renfrow	61.5%
	Hicks	38.5%

Pitt	Renfrow	65.8%
	Hicks	34.2%

Polk	Renfrow	44.4%
	Hicks	55.6%

Randolph	Renfrow	33.6%
	Hicks	66.4%

Richmond	Renfrow	68.9%
	Hicks	31.1%

Robeson	Renfrow	76.9%
	Hicks	23.1%

Rockingham	Renfrow	56.5%
	Hicks	43.5%

Rowan	Renfrow	43.1%
	Hicks	56.9%

Rutherford	Renfrow	50.9%
	Hicks	49.1%

Sampson	Renfrow	57.8%
	Hicks	42.2%

Scotland	Renfrow	70.5%
	Hicks	29.5%

Stanly	Renfrow	42.1%
	Hicks	57.9%

Stokes	Renfrow	46.1%
	Hicks	53.9%

Surry	Renfrow	48.2%
	Hicks	51.8%

Swain	Renfrow	58.4%
	Hicks	41.6%

Transylvania	Renfrow	44.9%
	Hicks	55.1%

Tyrrell	Renfrow	72.5%
	Hicks	27.5%

Union	Renfrow	48.8%
	Hicks	51.2%

Vance	Renfrow	70.8%
	Hicks	29.2%

Wake	Renfrow	59.7%
	Hicks	40.3%

Warren	Renfrow	79.8%
	Hicks	20.2%

Washington	Renfrow	73.4%
	Hicks	26.6%

Watauga	Renfrow	48.0%
	Hicks	52.0%

Wayne	Renfrow	58.4%
	Hicks	41.6%

Wilkes	Renfrow	37.0%
	Hicks	63.0%

Wilson	Renfrow	62.8%
	Hicks	37.2%

Yadkin	Renfrow	36.0%
	Hicks	64.0%

Yancey	Renfrow	53.7%
	Hicks	46.3%

National DataGraph for 1984 - North Carolina Results for 1984

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved