Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2009-02-08

Map

Map

Alamance	Goodwin	47.6%
	Odom	48.9%
	Other	3.5%

Alexander	Goodwin	35.5%
	Odom	60.8%
	Other	3.6%

Alleghany	Goodwin	47.0%
	Odom	48.2%
	Other	4.7%

Anson	Goodwin	70.3%
	Odom	27.7%
	Other	2.0%

Ashe	Goodwin	43.9%
	Odom	51.1%
	Other	5.0%

Avery	Goodwin	27.2%
	Odom	67.9%
	Other	4.9%

Beaufort	Goodwin	47.6%
	Odom	49.4%
	Other	2.9%

Bertie	Goodwin	75.7%
	Odom	22.7%
	Other	1.5%

Bladen	Goodwin	63.7%
	Odom	33.7%
	Other	2.6%

Brunswick	Goodwin	43.7%
	Odom	51.3%
	Other	5.0%

Buncombe	Goodwin	55.9%
	Odom	39.0%
	Other	5.1%

Burke	Goodwin	44.6%
	Odom	51.2%
	Other	4.2%

Cabarrus	Goodwin	41.4%
	Odom	54.0%
	Other	4.6%

Caldwell	Goodwin	38.7%
	Odom	55.9%
	Other	5.4%

Camden	Goodwin	43.3%
	Odom	50.8%
	Other	5.8%

Carteret	Goodwin	38.4%
	Odom	57.6%
	Other	3.9%

Caswell	Goodwin	57.8%
	Odom	39.3%
	Other	2.9%

Catawba	Goodwin	37.7%
	Odom	58.0%
	Other	4.2%

Chatham	Goodwin	55.4%
	Odom	40.3%
	Other	4.2%

Cherokee	Goodwin	36.7%
	Odom	59.1%
	Other	4.1%

Chowan	Goodwin	61.3%
	Odom	36.0%
	Other	2.7%

Clay	Goodwin	37.2%
	Odom	58.2%
	Other	4.6%

Cleveland	Goodwin	47.1%
	Odom	49.5%
	Other	3.5%

Columbus	Goodwin	62.8%
	Odom	33.9%
	Other	3.3%

Craven	Goodwin	47.7%
	Odom	48.9%
	Other	3.4%

Cumberland	Goodwin	61.1%
	Odom	35.9%
	Other	3.0%

Currituck	Goodwin	37.6%
	Odom	56.9%
	Other	5.5%

Dare	Goodwin	48.5%
	Odom	46.5%
	Other	5.0%

Davidson	Goodwin	35.4%
	Odom	60.5%
	Other	4.1%

Davie	Goodwin	30.5%
	Odom	65.8%
	Other	3.7%

Duplin	Goodwin	54.7%
	Odom	42.5%
	Other	2.8%

Durham	Goodwin	74.0%
	Odom	22.4%
	Other	3.5%

Edgecombe	Goodwin	73.7%
	Odom	25.0%
	Other	1.2%

Forsyth	Goodwin	53.5%
	Odom	42.9%
	Other	3.6%

Franklin	Goodwin	53.0%
	Odom	43.3%
	Other	3.7%

Gaston	Goodwin	39.1%
	Odom	57.0%
	Other	3.9%

Gates	Goodwin	61.8%
	Odom	35.9%
	Other	2.3%

Graham	Goodwin	35.7%
	Odom	60.3%
	Other	4.0%

Granville	Goodwin	57.6%
	Odom	39.1%
	Other	3.3%

Greene	Goodwin	58.4%
	Odom	39.7%
	Other	1.9%

Guilford	Goodwin	58.4%
	Odom	38.2%
	Other	3.4%

Halifax	Goodwin	71.0%
	Odom	27.5%
	Other	1.5%

Harnett	Goodwin	46.3%
	Odom	50.0%
	Other	3.7%

Haywood	Goodwin	51.1%
	Odom	44.7%
	Other	4.2%

Henderson	Goodwin	39.0%
	Odom	57.0%
	Other	4.0%

Hertford	Goodwin	77.0%
	Odom	21.5%
	Other	1.4%

Hoke	Goodwin	62.6%
	Odom	33.9%
	Other	3.6%

Hyde	Goodwin	61.8%
	Odom	34.6%
	Other	3.6%

Iredell	Goodwin	38.7%
	Odom	56.8%
	Other	4.5%

Jackson	Goodwin	54.5%
	Odom	40.9%
	Other	4.6%

Johnston	Goodwin	41.7%
	Odom	55.0%
	Other	3.3%

Jones	Goodwin	54.2%
	Odom	42.6%
	Other	3.2%

Lee	Goodwin	50.6%
	Odom	45.5%
	Other	3.9%

Lenoir	Goodwin	57.4%
	Odom	40.7%
	Other	1.9%

Lincoln	Goodwin	35.7%
	Odom	59.8%
	Other	4.6%

McDowell	Goodwin	42.8%
	Odom	51.8%
	Other	5.5%

Macon	Goodwin	43.3%
	Odom	52.1%
	Other	4.6%

Madison	Goodwin	53.0%
	Odom	42.0%
	Other	5.0%

Martin	Goodwin	66.1%
	Odom	31.9%
	Other	2.0%

Mecklenburg	Goodwin	58.6%
	Odom	38.1%
	Other	3.3%

Mitchell	Goodwin	28.3%
	Odom	66.7%
	Other	5.0%

Montgomery	Goodwin	53.7%
	Odom	43.0%
	Other	3.3%

Moore	Goodwin	39.1%
	Odom	57.0%
	Other	3.9%

Nash	Goodwin	54.2%
	Odom	43.7%
	Other	2.1%

New Hanover	Goodwin	47.8%
	Odom	46.3%
	Other	5.9%

Northampton	Goodwin	73.7%
	Odom	24.8%
	Other	1.4%

Onslow	Goodwin	42.8%
	Odom	51.7%
	Other	5.6%

Orange	Goodwin	68.9%
	Odom	26.3%
	Other	4.8%

Pamlico	Goodwin	49.4%
	Odom	47.2%
	Other	3.4%

Pasquotank	Goodwin	62.1%
	Odom	34.1%
	Other	3.9%

Pender	Goodwin	43.5%
	Odom	50.4%
	Other	6.1%

Perquimans	Goodwin	53.4%
	Odom	43.7%
	Other	2.9%

Person	Goodwin	53.7%
	Odom	42.6%
	Other	3.7%

Pitt	Goodwin	56.7%
	Odom	40.4%
	Other	2.9%

Polk	Goodwin	46.1%
	Odom	49.5%
	Other	4.4%

Randolph	Goodwin	30.2%
	Odom	65.0%
	Other	4.8%

Richmond	Goodwin	74.1%
	Odom	23.6%
	Other	2.3%

Robeson	Goodwin	68.9%
	Odom	28.4%
	Other	2.7%

Rockingham	Goodwin	47.5%
	Odom	48.0%
	Other	4.5%

Rowan	Goodwin	40.7%
	Odom	54.6%
	Other	4.7%

Rutherford	Goodwin	41.3%
	Odom	54.8%
	Other	3.9%

Sampson	Goodwin	51.8%
	Odom	46.1%
	Other	2.0%

Scotland	Goodwin	64.8%
	Odom	32.8%
	Other	2.3%

Stanly	Goodwin	36.2%
	Odom	59.5%
	Other	4.3%

Stokes	Goodwin	35.7%
	Odom	59.0%
	Other	5.3%

Surry	Goodwin	41.6%
	Odom	55.1%
	Other	3.4%

Swain	Goodwin	54.0%
	Odom	41.8%
	Other	4.2%

Transylvania	Goodwin	45.9%
	Odom	49.7%
	Other	4.4%

Tyrrell	Goodwin	63.9%
	Odom	32.7%
	Other	3.4%

Union	Goodwin	36.5%
	Odom	59.9%
	Other	3.6%

Vance	Goodwin	69.9%
	Odom	28.4%
	Other	1.8%

Wake	Goodwin	54.0%
	Odom	41.7%
	Other	4.2%

Warren	Goodwin	73.9%
	Odom	24.6%
	Other	1.5%

Washington	Goodwin	69.3%
	Odom	28.5%
	Other	2.2%

Watauga	Goodwin	49.0%
	Odom	44.9%
	Other	6.2%

Wayne	Goodwin	50.5%
	Odom	47.2%
	Other	2.3%

Wilkes	Goodwin	35.2%
	Odom	59.5%
	Other	5.3%

Wilson	Goodwin	57.3%
	Odom	41.0%
	Other	1.7%

Yadkin	Goodwin	29.7%
	Odom	65.6%
	Other	4.6%

Yancey	Goodwin	51.9%
	Odom	44.8%
	Other	3.2%

National DataGraph for 2008 - North Carolina Results for 2008

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved