Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2017-06-18

Map

Map

Alamance	Smith	37.9%
	Troxler	62.1%

Alexander	Smith	23.6%
	Troxler	76.4%

Alleghany	Smith	27.1%
	Troxler	72.9%

Anson	Smith	57.4%
	Troxler	42.6%

Ashe	Smith	28.8%
	Troxler	71.2%

Avery	Smith	20.8%
	Troxler	79.2%

Beaufort	Smith	36.4%
	Troxler	63.6%

Bertie	Smith	62.6%
	Troxler	37.4%

Bladen	Smith	48.2%
	Troxler	51.8%

Brunswick	Smith	33.8%
	Troxler	66.2%

Buncombe	Smith	54.3%
	Troxler	45.7%

Burke	Smith	32.7%
	Troxler	67.3%

Cabarrus	Smith	36.6%
	Troxler	63.4%

Caldwell	Smith	25.5%
	Troxler	74.5%

Camden	Smith	28.8%
	Troxler	71.2%

Carteret	Smith	26.4%
	Troxler	73.6%

Caswell	Smith	41.6%
	Troxler	58.4%

Catawba	Smith	29.1%
	Troxler	70.9%

Chatham	Smith	48.3%
	Troxler	51.7%

Cherokee	Smith	25.2%
	Troxler	74.8%

Chowan	Smith	43.1%
	Troxler	56.9%

Clay	Smith	27.9%
	Troxler	72.1%

Cleveland	Smith	35.7%
	Troxler	64.3%

Columbus	Smith	43.2%
	Troxler	56.8%

Craven	Smith	38.8%
	Troxler	61.2%

Cumberland	Smith	56.5%
	Troxler	43.5%

Currituck	Smith	26.1%
	Troxler	73.9%

Dare	Smith	40.2%
	Troxler	59.8%

Davidson	Smith	22.2%
	Troxler	77.8%

Davie	Smith	21.7%
	Troxler	78.3%

Duplin	Smith	41.1%
	Troxler	58.9%

Durham	Smith	73.8%
	Troxler	26.2%

Edgecombe	Smith	65.2%
	Troxler	34.8%

Forsyth	Smith	49.7%
	Troxler	50.3%

Franklin	Smith	40.2%
	Troxler	59.8%

Gaston	Smith	33.6%
	Troxler	66.4%

Gates	Smith	47.0%
	Troxler	53.0%

Graham	Smith	26.9%
	Troxler	73.1%

Granville	Smith	45.3%
	Troxler	54.7%

Greene	Smith	46.2%
	Troxler	53.8%

Guilford	Smith	52.6%
	Troxler	47.4%

Halifax	Smith	63.1%
	Troxler	36.9%

Harnett	Smith	35.6%
	Troxler	64.4%

Haywood	Smith	33.2%
	Troxler	66.8%

Henderson	Smith	32.4%
	Troxler	67.6%

Hertford	Smith	69.3%
	Troxler	30.7%

Hoke	Smith	54.7%
	Troxler	45.3%

Hyde	Smith	43.7%
	Troxler	56.3%

Iredell	Smith	30.1%
	Troxler	69.9%

Jackson	Smith	45.5%
	Troxler	54.5%

Johnston	Smith	30.0%
	Troxler	70.0%

Jones	Smith	43.1%
	Troxler	56.9%

Lee	Smith	39.5%
	Troxler	60.5%

Lenoir	Smith	48.7%
	Troxler	51.3%

Lincoln	Smith	26.0%
	Troxler	74.0%

McDowell	Smith	26.4%
	Troxler	73.6%

Macon	Smith	32.0%
	Troxler	68.0%

Madison	Smith	40.3%
	Troxler	59.7%

Martin	Smith	48.7%
	Troxler	51.3%

Mecklenburg	Smith	58.6%
	Troxler	41.4%

Mitchell	Smith	19.1%
	Troxler	80.9%

Montgomery	Smith	36.2%
	Troxler	63.8%

Moore	Smith	29.8%
	Troxler	70.2%

Nash	Smith	47.2%
	Troxler	52.8%

New Hanover	Smith	44.8%
	Troxler	55.2%

Northampton	Smith	62.7%
	Troxler	37.3%

Onslow	Smith	34.0%
	Troxler	66.0%

Orange	Smith	67.3%
	Troxler	32.7%

Pamlico	Smith	36.6%
	Troxler	63.4%

Pasquotank	Smith	51.6%
	Troxler	48.4%

Pender	Smith	34.3%
	Troxler	65.7%

Perquimans	Smith	37.1%
	Troxler	62.9%

Person	Smith	38.6%
	Troxler	61.4%

Pitt	Smith	51.1%
	Troxler	48.9%

Polk	Smith	37.4%
	Troxler	62.6%

Randolph	Smith	19.4%
	Troxler	80.6%

Richmond	Smith	46.4%
	Troxler	53.6%

Robeson	Smith	56.2%
	Troxler	43.8%

Rockingham	Smith	31.0%
	Troxler	69.0%

Rowan	Smith	29.7%
	Troxler	70.3%

Rutherford	Smith	28.9%
	Troxler	71.1%

Sampson	Smith	40.0%
	Troxler	60.0%

Scotland	Smith	54.3%
	Troxler	45.7%

Stanly	Smith	24.6%
	Troxler	75.4%

Stokes	Smith	21.3%
	Troxler	78.7%

Surry	Smith	23.8%
	Troxler	76.2%

Swain	Smith	42.1%
	Troxler	57.9%

Transylvania	Smith	36.3%
	Troxler	63.7%

Tyrrell	Smith	43.4%
	Troxler	56.6%

Union	Smith	31.0%
	Troxler	69.0%

Vance	Smith	60.7%
	Troxler	39.3%

Wake	Smith	49.7%
	Troxler	50.3%

Warren	Smith	64.7%
	Troxler	35.3%

Washington	Smith	57.0%
	Troxler	43.0%

Watauga	Smith	47.8%
	Troxler	52.2%

Wayne	Smith	42.4%
	Troxler	57.6%

Wilkes	Smith	22.3%
	Troxler	77.7%

Wilson	Smith	50.6%
	Troxler	49.4%

Yadkin	Smith	24.7%
	Troxler	75.3%

Yancey	Smith	38.2%
	Troxler	61.8%

National DataGraph for 2016 - North Carolina Results for 2016

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved