Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2007-02-24

Map

Map

Adair	Boyd	49.2%
	Fallin	44.3%
	Other	6.5%

Alfalfa	Boyd	25.2%
	Fallin	70.9%
	Other	3.9%

Atoka	Boyd	53.2%
	Fallin	42.6%
	Other	4.3%

Beaver	Boyd	22.3%
	Fallin	74.3%
	Other	3.4%

Beckham	Boyd	38.2%
	Fallin	58.0%
	Other	3.8%

Blaine	Boyd	32.9%
	Fallin	63.2%
	Other	4.0%

Bryan	Boyd	49.5%
	Fallin	47.1%
	Other	3.4%

Caddo	Boyd	47.1%
	Fallin	48.2%
	Other	4.7%

Canadian	Boyd	27.1%
	Fallin	68.9%
	Other	4.0%

Carter	Boyd	43.7%
	Fallin	52.8%
	Other	3.4%

Cherokee	Boyd	53.7%
	Fallin	40.1%
	Other	6.2%

Choctaw	Boyd	57.4%
	Fallin	38.6%
	Other	4.0%

Cimarron	Boyd	22.7%
	Fallin	72.8%
	Other	4.5%

Cleveland	Boyd	38.8%
	Fallin	57.5%
	Other	3.7%

Coal	Boyd	58.7%
	Fallin	37.3%
	Other	4.0%

Comanche	Boyd	40.3%
	Fallin	56.0%
	Other	3.7%

Cotton	Boyd	47.5%
	Fallin	47.4%
	Other	5.1%

Craig	Boyd	51.9%
	Fallin	42.7%
	Other	5.4%

Creek	Boyd	42.3%
	Fallin	51.5%
	Other	6.2%

Custer	Boyd	33.2%
	Fallin	63.1%
	Other	3.7%

Delaware	Boyd	44.1%
	Fallin	50.5%
	Other	5.4%

Dewey	Boyd	31.3%
	Fallin	63.8%
	Other	4.9%

Ellis	Boyd	30.2%
	Fallin	65.0%
	Other	4.8%

Garfield	Boyd	29.0%
	Fallin	66.8%
	Other	4.2%

Garvin	Boyd	43.8%
	Fallin	51.7%
	Other	4.5%

Grady	Boyd	38.3%
	Fallin	57.1%
	Other	4.5%

Grant	Boyd	33.0%
	Fallin	61.5%
	Other	5.5%

Greer	Boyd	44.0%
	Fallin	51.4%
	Other	4.6%

Harmon	Boyd	45.0%
	Fallin	51.7%
	Other	3.3%

Harper	Boyd	27.8%
	Fallin	68.7%
	Other	3.5%

Haskell	Boyd	60.1%
	Fallin	35.0%
	Other	4.9%

Hughes	Boyd	52.0%
	Fallin	43.9%
	Other	4.1%

Jackson	Boyd	33.4%
	Fallin	63.5%
	Other	3.1%

Jefferson	Boyd	51.1%
	Fallin	45.1%
	Other	3.8%

Johnston	Boyd	53.2%
	Fallin	43.0%
	Other	3.8%

Kay	Boyd	33.7%
	Fallin	61.4%
	Other	4.9%

Kingfisher	Boyd	22.3%
	Fallin	74.3%
	Other	3.4%

Kiowa	Boyd	45.8%
	Fallin	50.2%
	Other	4.0%

Latimer	Boyd	60.0%
	Fallin	34.5%
	Other	5.5%

Le Flore	Boyd	53.4%
	Fallin	42.8%
	Other	3.8%

Lincoln	Boyd	34.8%
	Fallin	59.7%
	Other	5.5%

Logan	Boyd	30.4%
	Fallin	65.4%
	Other	4.2%

Love	Boyd	50.2%
	Fallin	46.2%
	Other	3.6%

McClain	Boyd	37.6%
	Fallin	58.0%
	Other	4.4%

McCurtain	Boyd	57.0%
	Fallin	38.5%
	Other	4.5%

McIntosh	Boyd	56.3%
	Fallin	38.0%
	Other	5.7%

Major	Boyd	22.6%
	Fallin	73.6%
	Other	3.8%

Marshall	Boyd	48.4%
	Fallin	48.2%
	Other	3.4%

Mayes	Boyd	51.0%
	Fallin	44.2%
	Other	4.8%

Murray	Boyd	50.2%
	Fallin	46.0%
	Other	3.7%

Muskogee	Boyd	52.4%
	Fallin	42.9%
	Other	4.6%

Noble	Boyd	31.0%
	Fallin	64.2%
	Other	4.8%

Nowata	Boyd	47.4%
	Fallin	47.0%
	Other	5.5%

Okfuskee	Boyd	49.2%
	Fallin	45.0%
	Other	5.9%

Oklahoma	Boyd	33.6%
	Fallin	62.7%
	Other	3.7%

Okmulgee	Boyd	54.2%
	Fallin	40.7%
	Other	5.1%

Osage	Boyd	47.9%
	Fallin	47.0%
	Other	5.0%

Ottawa	Boyd	52.9%
	Fallin	41.8%
	Other	5.3%

Pawnee	Boyd	41.5%
	Fallin	53.2%
	Other	5.3%

Payne	Boyd	36.0%
	Fallin	59.7%
	Other	4.2%

Pittsburg	Boyd	54.1%
	Fallin	40.7%
	Other	5.2%

Pontotoc	Boyd	43.5%
	Fallin	52.6%
	Other	3.8%

Pottawatomie	Boyd	35.3%
	Fallin	60.7%
	Other	4.0%

Pushmataha	Boyd	55.2%
	Fallin	39.4%
	Other	5.4%

Roger Mills	Boyd	34.1%
	Fallin	60.9%
	Other	5.0%

Rogers	Boyd	40.7%
	Fallin	54.8%
	Other	4.5%

Seminole	Boyd	47.3%
	Fallin	48.9%
	Other	3.8%

Sequoyah	Boyd	52.6%
	Fallin	41.9%
	Other	5.5%

Stephens	Boyd	38.3%
	Fallin	58.1%
	Other	3.6%

Texas	Boyd	21.1%
	Fallin	75.7%
	Other	3.2%

Tillman	Boyd	50.4%
	Fallin	46.7%
	Other	3.0%

Tulsa	Boyd	34.9%
	Fallin	61.5%
	Other	3.7%

Wagoner	Boyd	40.8%
	Fallin	54.6%
	Other	4.7%

Washington	Boyd	32.4%
	Fallin	63.1%
	Other	4.5%

Washita	Boyd	36.8%
	Fallin	58.7%
	Other	4.5%

Woods	Boyd	29.0%
	Fallin	67.0%
	Other	4.0%

Woodward	Boyd	28.3%
	Fallin	68.3%
	Other	3.4%

National DataGraph for 2002 - Oklahoma Results for 2002

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved