Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2007-03-11

Map

Map

Abbeville	Beasley	38.9%
	DeMint	30.2%
	Ravenel	18.6%
	Other	12.3%

Aiken	Beasley	33.6%
	DeMint	38.9%
	Ravenel	13.2%
	Other	14.4%

Allendale	Beasley	26.8%
	DeMint	24.4%
	Ravenel	33.3%
	Other	15.4%

Anderson	Beasley	34.6%
	DeMint	31.1%
	Ravenel	22.6%
	Other	11.7%

Bamberg	Beasley	37.6%
	DeMint	16.5%
	Ravenel	33.5%
	Other	12.4%

Barnwell	Beasley	37.9%
	DeMint	17.1%
	Ravenel	23.2%
	Other	21.8%

Beaufort	Beasley	30.6%
	DeMint	37.6%
	Ravenel	20.6%
	Other	11.2%

Berkeley	Beasley	24.6%
	DeMint	11.2%
	Ravenel	45.0%
	Other	19.2%

Calhoun	Beasley	38.3%
	DeMint	18.6%
	Ravenel	30.6%
	Other	12.5%

Charleston	Beasley	17.3%
	DeMint	16.5%
	Ravenel	43.6%
	Other	22.5%

Cherokee	Beasley	44.3%
	DeMint	20.3%
	Ravenel	26.0%
	Other	9.4%

Chester	Beasley	39.4%
	DeMint	25.2%
	Ravenel	17.0%
	Other	18.3%

Chesterfield	Beasley	78.4%
	DeMint	8.2%
	Ravenel	6.3%
	Other	7.2%

Clarendon	Beasley	53.6%
	DeMint	10.1%
	Ravenel	25.1%
	Other	11.1%

Colleton	Beasley	23.0%
	DeMint	12.1%
	Ravenel	45.2%
	Other	19.7%

Darlington	Beasley	82.0%
	DeMint	5.9%
	Ravenel	6.0%
	Other	6.1%

Dillon	Beasley	68.8%
	DeMint	10.4%
	Ravenel	5.7%
	Other	15.1%

Dorchester	Beasley	27.9%
	DeMint	10.2%
	Ravenel	39.7%
	Other	22.2%

Edgefield	Beasley	40.3%
	DeMint	32.5%
	Ravenel	11.3%
	Other	16.0%

Fairfield	Beasley	42.6%
	DeMint	20.1%
	Ravenel	25.4%
	Other	11.8%

Florence	Beasley	70.3%
	DeMint	9.8%
	Ravenel	11.2%
	Other	8.6%

Georgetown	Beasley	37.6%
	DeMint	18.8%
	Ravenel	27.1%
	Other	16.5%

Greenville	Beasley	29.7%
	DeMint	47.4%
	Ravenel	17.8%
	Other	5.1%

Greenwood	Beasley	42.1%
	DeMint	25.5%
	Ravenel	21.7%
	Other	10.6%

Hampton	Beasley	38.8%
	DeMint	10.1%
	Ravenel	34.1%
	Other	17.1%

Horry	Beasley	49.3%
	DeMint	16.1%
	Ravenel	13.6%
	Other	20.9%

Jasper	Beasley	44.9%
	DeMint	20.0%
	Ravenel	22.0%
	Other	13.1%

Kershaw	Beasley	44.3%
	DeMint	18.2%
	Ravenel	27.4%
	Other	10.1%

Lancaster	Beasley	56.9%
	DeMint	18.6%
	Ravenel	10.8%
	Other	13.8%

Laurens	Beasley	41.8%
	DeMint	24.5%
	Ravenel	20.8%
	Other	12.9%

Lee	Beasley	63.7%
	DeMint	7.9%
	Ravenel	20.1%
	Other	8.4%

Lexington	Beasley	36.8%
	DeMint	22.1%
	Ravenel	30.3%
	Other	10.9%

McCormick	Beasley	27.8%
	DeMint	41.6%
	Ravenel	17.9%
	Other	12.6%

Marion	Beasley	72.3%
	DeMint	10.2%
	Ravenel	6.2%
	Other	11.3%

Marlboro	Beasley	68.0%
	DeMint	10.9%
	Ravenel	0.0%
	Other	21.1%

Newberry	Beasley	35.0%
	DeMint	24.3%
	Ravenel	31.0%
	Other	9.7%

Oconee	Beasley	36.8%
	DeMint	31.8%
	Ravenel	24.0%
	Other	7.5%

Orangeburg	Beasley	39.3%
	DeMint	17.1%
	Ravenel	30.6%
	Other	13.0%

Pickens	Beasley	44.0%
	DeMint	26.4%
	Ravenel	21.3%
	Other	8.3%

Richland	Beasley	34.5%
	DeMint	30.1%
	Ravenel	26.9%
	Other	8.4%

Saluda	Beasley	43.4%
	DeMint	17.4%
	Ravenel	27.4%
	Other	11.8%

Spartanburg	Beasley	34.1%
	DeMint	33.9%
	Ravenel	22.9%
	Other	9.1%

Sumter	Beasley	51.4%
	DeMint	10.5%
	Ravenel	30.1%
	Other	8.1%

Union	Beasley	40.9%
	DeMint	31.8%
	Ravenel	19.6%
	Other	7.7%

Williamsburg	Beasley	49.9%
	DeMint	4.9%
	Ravenel	27.1%
	Other	18.2%

York	Beasley	40.4%
	DeMint	28.7%
	Ravenel	17.0%
	Other	13.9%

National DataGraph for 2004 - South Carolina Results for 2004

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved