Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2014-10-06

Map

Map

Alamance	Ervin	62.4%
	Greene	37.6%

Alexander	Ervin	50.7%
	Greene	49.3%

Alleghany	Ervin	60.9%
	Greene	39.1%

Anson	Ervin	84.2%
	Greene	15.8%

Ashe	Ervin	53.1%
	Greene	46.9%

Avery	Ervin	33.7%
	Greene	66.3%

Beaufort	Ervin	86.8%
	Greene	13.2%

Bertie	Ervin	93.8%
	Greene	6.2%

Bladen	Ervin	86.7%
	Greene	13.3%

Brunswick	Ervin	61.4%
	Greene	38.6%

Buncombe	Ervin	57.9%
	Greene	42.1%

Burke	Ervin	53.8%
	Greene	46.2%

Cabarrus	Ervin	54.2%
	Greene	45.8%

Caldwell	Ervin	55.0%
	Greene	45.0%

Camden	Ervin	91.7%
	Greene	8.3%

Carteret	Ervin	64.6%
	Greene	35.4%

Caswell	Ervin	80.3%
	Greene	19.7%

Catawba	Ervin	50.6%
	Greene	49.4%

Chatham	Ervin	63.2%
	Greene	36.8%

Cherokee	Ervin	49.2%
	Greene	50.8%

Chowan	Ervin	90.1%
	Greene	9.9%

Clay	Ervin	52.7%
	Greene	47.3%

Cleveland	Ervin	74.6%
	Greene	25.4%

Columbus	Ervin	85.2%
	Greene	14.8%

Craven	Ervin	79.0%
	Greene	21.0%

Cumberland	Ervin	71.7%
	Greene	28.3%

Currituck	Ervin	94.8%
	Greene	5.2%

Dare	Ervin	80.7%
	Greene	19.3%

Davidson	Ervin	53.5%
	Greene	46.5%

Davie	Ervin	42.9%
	Greene	57.1%

Duplin	Ervin	77.3%
	Greene	22.7%

Durham	Ervin	68.6%
	Greene	31.4%

Edgecombe	Ervin	88.3%
	Greene	11.7%

Forsyth	Ervin	61.2%
	Greene	38.8%

Franklin	Ervin	88.9%
	Greene	11.1%

Gaston	Ervin	64.5%
	Greene	35.5%

Gates	Ervin	94.5%
	Greene	5.5%

Graham	Ervin	53.9%
	Greene	46.1%

Granville	Ervin	86.2%
	Greene	13.8%

Greene	Ervin	93.3%
	Greene	6.7%

Guilford	Ervin	51.6%
	Greene	48.4%

Halifax	Ervin	90.7%
	Greene	9.3%

Harnett	Ervin	72.3%
	Greene	27.7%

Haywood	Ervin	66.6%
	Greene	33.4%

Henderson	Ervin	47.0%
	Greene	53.0%

Hertford	Ervin	94.5%
	Greene	5.5%

Hoke	Ervin	91.5%
	Greene	8.5%

Hyde	Ervin	80.0%
	Greene	20.0%

Iredell	Ervin	58.2%
	Greene	41.8%

Jackson	Ervin	57.1%
	Greene	42.9%

Johnston	Ervin	71.4%
	Greene	28.6%

Jones	Ervin	88.9%
	Greene	11.1%

Lee	Ervin	75.7%
	Greene	24.3%

Lenoir	Ervin	73.9%
	Greene	26.1%

Lincoln	Ervin	53.9%
	Greene	46.1%

McDowell	Ervin	61.6%
	Greene	38.4%

Macon	Ervin	56.9%
	Greene	43.1%

Madison	Ervin	61.8%
	Greene	38.2%

Martin	Ervin	83.4%
	Greene	16.6%

Mecklenburg	Ervin	54.1%
	Greene	45.9%

Mitchell	Ervin	37.3%
	Greene	62.7%

Montgomery	Ervin	55.5%
	Greene	44.5%

Moore	Ervin	56.6%
	Greene	43.4%

Nash	Ervin	84.4%
	Greene	15.6%

New Hanover	Ervin	71.5%
	Greene	28.5%

Northampton	Ervin	94.0%
	Greene	6.0%

Onslow	Ervin	77.7%
	Greene	22.3%

Orange	Ervin	68.2%
	Greene	31.8%

Pamlico	Ervin	72.6%
	Greene	27.4%

Pasquotank	Ervin	83.6%
	Greene	16.4%

Pender	Ervin	84.8%
	Greene	15.2%

Perquimans	Ervin	87.8%
	Greene	12.2%

Person	Ervin	82.8%
	Greene	17.2%

Pitt	Ervin	86.7%
	Greene	13.3%

Polk	Ervin	54.7%
	Greene	45.3%

Randolph	Ervin	43.4%
	Greene	56.6%

Richmond	Ervin	79.5%
	Greene	20.5%

Robeson	Ervin	92.0%
	Greene	8.0%

Rockingham	Ervin	70.3%
	Greene	29.7%

Rowan	Ervin	57.4%
	Greene	42.6%

Rutherford	Ervin	65.3%
	Greene	34.7%

Sampson	Ervin	54.7%
	Greene	45.3%

Scotland	Ervin	88.1%
	Greene	11.9%

Stanly	Ervin	48.2%
	Greene	51.8%

Stokes	Ervin	55.6%
	Greene	44.4%

Surry	Ervin	58.1%
	Greene	41.9%

Swain	Ervin	58.1%
	Greene	41.9%

Transylvania	Ervin	55.6%
	Greene	44.4%

Tyrrell	Ervin	88.6%
	Greene	11.4%

Union	Ervin	76.2%
	Greene	23.8%

Vance	Ervin	87.0%
	Greene	13.0%

Wake	Ervin	67.4%
	Greene	32.6%

Warren	Ervin	91.0%
	Greene	9.0%

Washington	Ervin	79.9%
	Greene	20.1%

Watauga	Ervin	46.3%
	Greene	53.7%

Wayne	Ervin	79.7%
	Greene	20.3%

Wilkes	Ervin	44.7%
	Greene	55.3%

Wilson	Ervin	85.0%
	Greene	15.0%

Yadkin	Ervin	40.6%
	Greene	59.4%

Yancey	Ervin	57.3%
	Greene	42.7%

National DataGraph for 1962 - North Carolina Results for 1962

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved