Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2016-06-06

Map

Map

Adams	Casey	38.8%
	Depuy	60.0%
	Other	1.2%

Allegheny	Casey	61.9%
	Depuy	36.1%
	Other	2.0%

Armstrong	Casey	54.0%
	Depuy	44.7%
	Other	1.3%

Beaver	Casey	65.2%
	Depuy	33.2%
	Other	1.6%

Bedford	Casey	35.2%
	Depuy	64.1%
	Other	0.8%

Berks	Casey	55.2%
	Depuy	43.2%
	Other	1.6%

Blair	Casey	38.8%
	Depuy	59.5%
	Other	1.7%

Bradford	Casey	33.2%
	Depuy	65.8%
	Other	1.0%

Bucks	Casey	45.9%
	Depuy	49.3%
	Other	4.8%

Butler	Casey	52.4%
	Depuy	45.7%
	Other	1.9%

Cambria	Casey	61.0%
	Depuy	38.2%
	Other	0.8%

Cameron	Casey	42.2%
	Depuy	57.2%
	Other	0.6%

Carbon	Casey	52.2%
	Depuy	46.9%
	Other	0.9%

Centre	Casey	40.9%
	Depuy	58.0%
	Other	1.1%

Chester	Casey	40.2%
	Depuy	57.5%
	Other	2.4%

Clarion	Casey	48.2%
	Depuy	50.6%
	Other	1.2%

Clearfield	Casey	48.9%
	Depuy	50.2%
	Other	1.0%

Clinton	Casey	47.6%
	Depuy	51.5%
	Other	0.9%

Columbia	Casey	50.3%
	Depuy	47.1%
	Other	2.7%

Crawford	Casey	45.2%
	Depuy	52.9%
	Other	1.9%

Cumberland	Casey	36.1%
	Depuy	61.7%
	Other	2.3%

Dauphin	Casey	35.4%
	Depuy	62.3%
	Other	2.3%

Delaware	Casey	43.8%
	Depuy	54.9%
	Other	1.3%

Elk	Casey	59.4%
	Depuy	39.8%
	Other	0.8%

Erie	Casey	56.3%
	Depuy	42.9%
	Other	0.8%

Fayette	Casey	66.8%
	Depuy	31.9%
	Other	1.2%

Forest	Casey	40.0%
	Depuy	59.1%
	Other	0.8%

Franklin	Casey	40.6%
	Depuy	57.3%
	Other	2.1%

Fulton	Casey	42.0%
	Depuy	56.6%
	Other	1.4%

Greene	Casey	69.0%
	Depuy	30.0%
	Other	1.0%

Huntingdon	Casey	36.5%
	Depuy	61.7%
	Other	1.8%

Indiana	Casey	47.1%
	Depuy	52.1%
	Other	0.8%

Jefferson	Casey	44.8%
	Depuy	54.5%
	Other	0.8%

Juniata	Casey	40.4%
	Depuy	57.9%
	Other	1.7%

Lackawanna	Casey	65.4%
	Depuy	34.3%
	Other	0.3%

Lancaster	Casey	31.4%
	Depuy	65.2%
	Other	3.4%

Lawrence	Casey	56.1%
	Depuy	42.8%
	Other	1.1%

Lebanon	Casey	32.7%
	Depuy	64.2%
	Other	3.1%

Lehigh	Casey	52.2%
	Depuy	46.8%
	Other	1.0%

Luzerne	Casey	60.6%
	Depuy	37.9%
	Other	1.5%

Lycoming	Casey	45.6%
	Depuy	52.6%
	Other	1.8%

McKean	Casey	36.3%
	Depuy	63.1%
	Other	0.6%

Mercer	Casey	51.7%
	Depuy	47.0%
	Other	1.3%

Mifflin	Casey	44.0%
	Depuy	55.1%
	Other	0.9%

Monroe	Casey	47.8%
	Depuy	50.8%
	Other	1.3%

Montgomery	Casey	41.5%
	Depuy	57.0%
	Other	1.5%

Montour	Casey	47.4%
	Depuy	51.4%
	Other	1.2%

Northampton	Casey	60.7%
	Depuy	38.1%
	Other	1.2%

Northumberland	Casey	45.6%
	Depuy	53.1%
	Other	1.2%

Perry	Casey	36.8%
	Depuy	60.3%
	Other	2.9%

Philadelphia	Casey	66.6%
	Depuy	32.2%
	Other	1.2%

Pike	Casey	26.3%
	Depuy	72.4%
	Other	1.3%

Potter	Casey	34.3%
	Depuy	64.6%
	Other	1.1%

Schuylkill	Casey	47.8%
	Depuy	51.2%
	Other	1.0%

Snyder	Casey	26.1%
	Depuy	71.5%
	Other	2.4%

Somerset	Casey	44.7%
	Depuy	54.7%
	Other	0.6%

Sullivan	Casey	43.7%
	Depuy	55.8%
	Other	0.5%

Susquehanna	Casey	37.0%
	Depuy	61.5%
	Other	1.5%

Tioga	Casey	29.8%
	Depuy	69.2%
	Other	1.0%

Union	Casey	27.9%
	Depuy	70.3%
	Other	1.8%

Venango	Casey	42.6%
	Depuy	56.2%
	Other	1.2%

Warren	Casey	41.0%
	Depuy	58.4%
	Other	0.6%

Washington	Casey	66.9%
	Depuy	30.8%
	Other	2.3%

Wayne	Casey	32.0%
	Depuy	64.9%
	Other	3.1%

Westmoreland	Casey	65.3%
	Depuy	32.9%
	Other	1.8%

Wyoming	Casey	38.5%
	Depuy	60.3%
	Other	1.1%

York	Casey	43.0%
	Depuy	55.1%
	Other	1.8%

National DataGraph for 1968 - Pennsylvania Results for 1968

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved