Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2016-07-25

Map

Map

Adams	Haskell	45.9%
	Armstrong	53.2%
	Other	1.0%

Alamosa	Haskell	43.0%
	Armstrong	56.3%
	Other	0.8%

Arapahoe	Haskell	28.8%
	Armstrong	70.2%
	Other	1.0%

Archuleta	Haskell	42.4%
	Armstrong	56.8%
	Other	0.8%

Baca	Haskell	40.4%
	Armstrong	58.8%
	Other	0.8%

Bent	Haskell	43.6%
	Armstrong	55.5%
	Other	0.8%

Boulder	Haskell	45.7%
	Armstrong	53.5%
	Other	0.8%

Chaffee	Haskell	45.1%
	Armstrong	53.7%
	Other	1.3%

Cheyenne	Haskell	37.7%
	Armstrong	61.8%
	Other	0.5%

Clear Creek	Haskell	40.8%
	Armstrong	57.8%
	Other	1.4%

Conejos	Haskell	49.8%
	Armstrong	48.7%
	Other	1.6%

Costilla	Haskell	70.0%
	Armstrong	29.4%
	Other	0.7%

Crowley	Haskell	35.4%
	Armstrong	63.9%
	Other	0.7%

Custer	Haskell	31.0%
	Armstrong	67.6%
	Other	1.4%

Delta	Haskell	36.2%
	Armstrong	62.8%
	Other	1.0%

Denver	Haskell	50.5%
	Armstrong	47.8%
	Other	1.7%

Dolores	Haskell	38.4%
	Armstrong	59.2%
	Other	2.3%

Douglas	Haskell	24.1%
	Armstrong	75.2%
	Other	0.7%

Eagle	Haskell	40.7%
	Armstrong	58.3%
	Other	1.0%

Elbert	Haskell	30.9%
	Armstrong	68.1%
	Other	1.0%

El Paso	Haskell	30.8%
	Armstrong	68.4%
	Other	0.8%

Fremont	Haskell	38.8%
	Armstrong	60.5%
	Other	0.7%

Garfield	Haskell	40.8%
	Armstrong	58.1%
	Other	1.1%

Gilpin	Haskell	53.0%
	Armstrong	44.8%
	Other	2.2%

Grand	Haskell	32.1%
	Armstrong	67.5%
	Other	0.4%

Gunnison	Haskell	39.7%
	Armstrong	59.4%
	Other	1.0%

Hinsdale	Haskell	29.1%
	Armstrong	69.6%
	Other	1.3%

Huerfano	Haskell	56.2%
	Armstrong	43.3%
	Other	0.5%

Jackson	Haskell	35.2%
	Armstrong	64.3%
	Other	0.5%

Jefferson	Haskell	33.5%
	Armstrong	65.7%
	Other	0.7%

Kiowa	Haskell	41.5%
	Armstrong	58.1%
	Other	0.4%

Kit Carson	Haskell	31.9%
	Armstrong	67.5%
	Other	0.7%

Lake	Haskell	50.8%
	Armstrong	47.6%
	Other	1.6%

La Plata	Haskell	36.6%
	Armstrong	62.6%
	Other	0.8%

Larimer	Haskell	38.2%
	Armstrong	61.2%
	Other	0.6%

Las Animas	Haskell	60.7%
	Armstrong	38.6%
	Other	0.7%

Lincoln	Haskell	31.4%
	Armstrong	68.1%
	Other	0.4%

Logan	Haskell	31.3%
	Armstrong	68.0%
	Other	0.7%

Mesa	Haskell	33.8%
	Armstrong	65.4%
	Other	0.8%

Mineral	Haskell	37.3%
	Armstrong	61.9%
	Other	0.7%

Moffat	Haskell	34.1%
	Armstrong	62.5%
	Other	3.4%

Montezuma	Haskell	37.4%
	Armstrong	60.9%
	Other	1.7%

Montrose	Haskell	36.7%
	Armstrong	62.8%
	Other	0.5%

Morgan	Haskell	34.7%
	Armstrong	64.0%
	Other	1.3%

Otero	Haskell	39.7%
	Armstrong	58.3%
	Other	2.0%

Ouray	Haskell	31.4%
	Armstrong	67.8%
	Other	0.8%

Park	Haskell	38.3%
	Armstrong	59.7%
	Other	1.9%

Phillips	Haskell	35.1%
	Armstrong	64.3%
	Other	0.6%

Pitkin	Haskell	52.2%
	Armstrong	47.3%
	Other	0.5%

Prowers	Haskell	42.5%
	Armstrong	55.1%
	Other	2.4%

Pueblo	Haskell	52.8%
	Armstrong	46.6%
	Other	0.6%

Rio Blanco	Haskell	34.5%
	Armstrong	64.4%
	Other	1.1%

Rio Grande	Haskell	32.4%
	Armstrong	66.3%
	Other	1.3%

Routt	Haskell	44.8%
	Armstrong	54.4%
	Other	0.8%

Saguache	Haskell	43.5%
	Armstrong	53.1%
	Other	3.3%

San Juan	Haskell	43.8%
	Armstrong	54.7%
	Other	1.5%

San Miguel	Haskell	56.1%
	Armstrong	43.4%
	Other	0.5%

Sedgwick	Haskell	34.2%
	Armstrong	65.1%
	Other	0.6%

Summit	Haskell	38.3%
	Armstrong	61.1%
	Other	0.6%

Teller	Haskell	35.3%
	Armstrong	63.8%
	Other	0.9%

Washington	Haskell	29.2%
	Armstrong	70.0%
	Other	0.9%

Weld	Haskell	39.9%
	Armstrong	59.5%
	Other	0.6%

Yuma	Haskell	32.2%
	Armstrong	67.3%
	Other	0.6%

National DataGraph for 1978 - Colorado Results for 1978

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved