Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2014-07-11

Map

Map

Adair	Walters	40.3%
	Turpen	50.7%
	Fisher	4.2%
	Other	4.8%

Alfalfa	Walters	39.1%
	Turpen	49.7%
	Fisher	3.0%
	Other	8.2%

Atoka	Walters	36.5%
	Turpen	28.3%
	Fisher	17.2%
	Other	18.1%

Beaver	Walters	27.0%
	Turpen	41.6%
	Fisher	9.3%
	Other	22.1%

Beckham	Walters	66.7%
	Turpen	24.4%
	Fisher	3.7%
	Other	5.2%

Blaine	Walters	48.1%
	Turpen	39.0%
	Fisher	6.7%
	Other	6.2%

Bryan	Walters	47.6%
	Turpen	30.9%
	Fisher	9.1%
	Other	12.4%

Caddo	Walters	52.7%
	Turpen	37.1%
	Fisher	4.8%
	Other	5.4%

Canadian	Walters	53.6%
	Turpen	37.2%
	Fisher	3.6%
	Other	5.7%

Carter	Walters	43.9%
	Turpen	21.4%
	Fisher	22.9%
	Other	11.8%

Cherokee	Walters	36.9%
	Turpen	54.2%
	Fisher	4.3%
	Other	4.5%

Choctaw	Walters	54.2%
	Turpen	28.3%
	Fisher	7.6%
	Other	9.9%

Cimarron	Walters	47.8%
	Turpen	21.4%
	Fisher	15.8%
	Other	15.0%

Cleveland	Walters	52.9%
	Turpen	34.0%
	Fisher	7.1%
	Other	6.1%

Coal	Walters	28.2%
	Turpen	33.0%
	Fisher	10.1%
	Other	28.7%

Comanche	Walters	54.2%
	Turpen	36.6%
	Fisher	3.4%
	Other	5.8%

Cotton	Walters	49.3%
	Turpen	37.3%
	Fisher	7.1%
	Other	6.4%

Craig	Walters	50.1%
	Turpen	41.6%
	Fisher	2.4%
	Other	5.9%

Creek	Walters	40.7%
	Turpen	45.3%
	Fisher	7.1%
	Other	6.8%

Custer	Walters	61.7%
	Turpen	30.3%
	Fisher	4.0%
	Other	4.1%

Delaware	Walters	37.3%
	Turpen	53.4%
	Fisher	2.9%
	Other	6.4%

Dewey	Walters	60.2%
	Turpen	27.7%
	Fisher	3.3%
	Other	8.8%

Ellis	Walters	51.2%
	Turpen	32.9%
	Fisher	7.2%
	Other	8.7%

Garfield	Walters	52.5%
	Turpen	36.2%
	Fisher	3.8%
	Other	7.5%

Garvin	Walters	43.4%
	Turpen	41.0%
	Fisher	7.6%
	Other	8.0%

Grady	Walters	53.6%
	Turpen	37.7%
	Fisher	4.1%
	Other	4.7%

Grant	Walters	50.2%
	Turpen	36.3%
	Fisher	3.0%
	Other	10.5%

Greer	Walters	43.3%
	Turpen	46.0%
	Fisher	5.4%
	Other	5.3%

Harmon	Walters	43.8%
	Turpen	42.6%
	Fisher	8.2%
	Other	5.4%

Harper	Walters	49.3%
	Turpen	33.8%
	Fisher	6.5%
	Other	10.5%

Haskell	Walters	37.9%
	Turpen	46.6%
	Fisher	10.2%
	Other	5.4%

Hughes	Walters	53.8%
	Turpen	36.9%
	Fisher	3.0%
	Other	6.2%

Jackson	Walters	48.4%
	Turpen	39.9%
	Fisher	6.6%
	Other	5.0%

Jefferson	Walters	30.0%
	Turpen	34.6%
	Fisher	22.5%
	Other	12.9%

Johnston	Walters	45.3%
	Turpen	22.8%
	Fisher	13.1%
	Other	18.8%

Kay	Walters	49.1%
	Turpen	39.8%
	Fisher	2.6%
	Other	8.6%

Kingfisher	Walters	54.6%
	Turpen	33.6%
	Fisher	6.1%
	Other	5.8%

Kiowa	Walters	44.2%
	Turpen	47.1%
	Fisher	3.6%
	Other	5.2%

Latimer	Walters	42.8%
	Turpen	38.7%
	Fisher	11.0%
	Other	7.5%

Le Flore	Walters	45.2%
	Turpen	39.3%
	Fisher	8.6%
	Other	6.9%

Lincoln	Walters	51.7%
	Turpen	38.3%
	Fisher	3.8%
	Other	6.2%

Logan	Walters	51.6%
	Turpen	37.1%
	Fisher	4.2%
	Other	7.1%

Love	Walters	34.0%
	Turpen	16.5%
	Fisher	37.7%
	Other	11.8%

McClain	Walters	50.2%
	Turpen	38.0%
	Fisher	5.4%
	Other	6.3%

McCurtain	Walters	22.7%
	Turpen	38.9%
	Fisher	32.3%
	Other	6.1%

McIntosh	Walters	40.4%
	Turpen	49.7%
	Fisher	3.7%
	Other	6.2%

Major	Walters	55.9%
	Turpen	36.2%
	Fisher	3.1%
	Other	4.8%

Marshall	Walters	41.4%
	Turpen	25.1%
	Fisher	22.2%
	Other	11.4%

Mayes	Walters	37.7%
	Turpen	51.8%
	Fisher	4.4%
	Other	6.1%

Murray	Walters	39.2%
	Turpen	29.0%
	Fisher	6.0%
	Other	25.8%

Muskogee	Walters	28.6%
	Turpen	63.9%
	Fisher	3.7%
	Other	3.8%

Noble	Walters	41.1%
	Turpen	47.3%
	Fisher	6.0%
	Other	5.7%

Nowata	Walters	46.0%
	Turpen	41.8%
	Fisher	2.7%
	Other	9.5%

Okfuskee	Walters	39.8%
	Turpen	47.7%
	Fisher	6.9%
	Other	5.7%

Oklahoma	Walters	53.2%
	Turpen	35.7%
	Fisher	4.1%
	Other	7.1%

Okmulgee	Walters	37.5%
	Turpen	52.4%
	Fisher	4.3%
	Other	5.8%

Osage	Walters	43.9%
	Turpen	46.9%
	Fisher	3.1%
	Other	6.0%

Ottawa	Walters	31.5%
	Turpen	54.6%
	Fisher	3.4%
	Other	10.4%

Pawnee	Walters	43.8%
	Turpen	46.6%
	Fisher	3.9%
	Other	5.7%

Payne	Walters	53.2%
	Turpen	36.7%
	Fisher	4.3%
	Other	5.8%

Pittsburg	Walters	40.8%
	Turpen	40.8%
	Fisher	11.1%
	Other	7.3%

Pontotoc	Walters	39.4%
	Turpen	42.0%
	Fisher	6.1%
	Other	12.5%

Pottawatomie	Walters	55.5%
	Turpen	35.7%
	Fisher	2.6%
	Other	6.2%

Pushmataha	Walters	47.3%
	Turpen	29.2%
	Fisher	11.5%
	Other	12.0%

Roger Mills	Walters	59.7%
	Turpen	25.8%
	Fisher	5.4%
	Other	9.0%

Rogers	Walters	40.7%
	Turpen	49.0%
	Fisher	4.5%
	Other	5.8%

Seminole	Walters	57.2%
	Turpen	32.1%
	Fisher	3.5%
	Other	7.3%

Sequoyah	Walters	35.7%
	Turpen	48.5%
	Fisher	8.7%
	Other	7.1%

Stephens	Walters	44.2%
	Turpen	44.2%
	Fisher	5.1%
	Other	6.5%

Texas	Walters	35.8%
	Turpen	34.3%
	Fisher	9.0%
	Other	20.8%

Tillman	Walters	39.5%
	Turpen	42.0%
	Fisher	10.5%
	Other	8.0%

Tulsa	Walters	44.3%
	Turpen	46.9%
	Fisher	3.6%
	Other	5.3%

Wagoner	Walters	40.9%
	Turpen	49.3%
	Fisher	3.9%
	Other	5.9%

Washington	Walters	51.1%
	Turpen	38.3%
	Fisher	3.3%
	Other	7.3%

Washita	Walters	64.9%
	Turpen	28.9%
	Fisher	2.7%
	Other	3.4%

Woods	Walters	44.2%
	Turpen	44.3%
	Fisher	3.9%
	Other	7.6%

Woodward	Walters	55.6%
	Turpen	34.8%
	Fisher	3.4%
	Other	6.2%

National DataGraph for 1986 - Oklahoma Results for 1986

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved