Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Alcona	Buchanan	31.6%
	Dole	51.4%
	Forbes	8.1%
	Other	8.8%

Alger	Buchanan	34.3%
	Dole	48.7%
	Forbes	4.3%
	Other	12.7%

Allegan	Buchanan	33.1%
	Dole	53.8%
	Forbes	2.8%
	Other	10.2%

Alpena	Buchanan	35.6%
	Dole	51.5%
	Forbes	5.2%
	Other	7.8%

Antrim	Buchanan	25.9%
	Dole	55.6%
	Forbes	5.5%
	Other	13.0%

Arenac	Buchanan	39.1%
	Dole	51.6%
	Forbes	3.2%
	Other	6.0%

Baraga	Buchanan	48.7%
	Dole	41.6%
	Forbes	3.9%
	Other	5.9%

Barry	Buchanan	31.9%
	Dole	54.4%
	Forbes	3.8%
	Other	9.8%

Bay	Buchanan	43.3%
	Dole	41.9%
	Forbes	5.2%
	Other	9.6%

Benzie	Buchanan	24.3%
	Dole	63.6%
	Forbes	3.2%
	Other	8.9%

Berrien	Buchanan	26.2%
	Dole	61.4%
	Forbes	3.9%
	Other	8.5%

Branch	Buchanan	32.5%
	Dole	54.0%
	Forbes	3.8%
	Other	9.7%

Calhoun	Buchanan	28.8%
	Dole	60.6%
	Forbes	3.2%
	Other	7.5%

Cass	Buchanan	33.6%
	Dole	53.8%
	Forbes	2.8%
	Other	9.9%

Charlevoix	Buchanan	34.6%
	Dole	51.5%
	Forbes	5.3%
	Other	8.5%

Cheboygan	Buchanan	38.8%
	Dole	49.2%
	Forbes	5.2%
	Other	6.8%

Chippewa	Buchanan	29.8%
	Dole	55.8%
	Forbes	4.8%
	Other	9.6%

Clare	Buchanan	38.5%
	Dole	49.2%
	Forbes	3.9%
	Other	8.4%

Clinton	Buchanan	33.4%
	Dole	54.2%
	Forbes	3.6%
	Other	8.8%

Crawford	Buchanan	36.9%
	Dole	46.8%
	Forbes	4.8%
	Other	11.4%

Delta	Buchanan	32.1%
	Dole	49.3%
	Forbes	4.4%
	Other	14.2%

Dickinson	Buchanan	40.8%
	Dole	47.4%
	Forbes	2.6%
	Other	9.2%

Eaton	Buchanan	29.0%
	Dole	55.4%
	Forbes	4.3%
	Other	11.3%

Emmet	Buchanan	39.0%
	Dole	48.1%
	Forbes	5.1%
	Other	7.8%

Genesee	Buchanan	44.8%
	Dole	46.6%
	Forbes	2.7%
	Other	5.9%

Gladwin	Buchanan	41.6%
	Dole	49.2%
	Forbes	3.2%
	Other	6.0%

Gogebic	Buchanan	38.4%
	Dole	50.5%
	Forbes	3.6%
	Other	7.5%

Grand Traverse	Buchanan	23.8%
	Dole	62.7%
	Forbes	5.3%
	Other	8.2%

Gratiot	Buchanan	30.8%
	Dole	59.4%
	Forbes	2.5%
	Other	7.4%

Hillsdale	Buchanan	33.5%
	Dole	50.6%
	Forbes	4.6%
	Other	11.4%

Houghton	Buchanan	46.0%
	Dole	41.2%
	Forbes	4.1%
	Other	8.7%

Huron	Buchanan	40.8%
	Dole	48.4%
	Forbes	2.8%
	Other	8.0%

Ingham	Buchanan	25.7%
	Dole	58.8%
	Forbes	5.3%
	Other	10.3%

Ionia	Buchanan	32.9%
	Dole	52.9%
	Forbes	3.8%
	Other	10.4%

Iosco	Buchanan	32.3%
	Dole	51.8%
	Forbes	4.1%
	Other	11.8%

Iron	Buchanan	42.1%
	Dole	46.9%
	Forbes	3.3%
	Other	7.8%

Isabella	Buchanan	28.7%
	Dole	54.8%
	Forbes	4.7%
	Other	11.7%

Jackson	Buchanan	35.7%
	Dole	51.1%
	Forbes	3.8%
	Other	9.3%

Kalamazoo	Buchanan	28.5%
	Dole	59.1%
	Forbes	3.4%
	Other	9.0%

Kalkaska	Buchanan	36.5%
	Dole	52.3%
	Forbes	3.4%
	Other	7.9%

Kent	Buchanan	26.9%
	Dole	58.4%
	Forbes	3.0%
	Other	11.6%

Keweenaw	Buchanan	29.4%
	Dole	51.5%
	Forbes	5.6%
	Other	13.4%

Lake	Buchanan	32.3%
	Dole	51.5%
	Forbes	4.0%
	Other	12.3%

Lapeer	Buchanan	49.2%
	Dole	40.7%
	Forbes	3.4%
	Other	6.8%

Leelanau	Buchanan	18.6%
	Dole	65.1%
	Forbes	6.4%
	Other	9.9%

Lenawee	Buchanan	34.2%
	Dole	50.9%
	Forbes	4.3%
	Other	10.6%

Livingston	Buchanan	35.6%
	Dole	51.7%
	Forbes	5.1%
	Other	7.7%

Luce	Buchanan	31.2%
	Dole	48.2%
	Forbes	5.0%
	Other	15.5%

Mackinac	Buchanan	29.8%
	Dole	54.2%
	Forbes	5.9%
	Other	10.2%

Macomb	Buchanan	41.0%
	Dole	45.0%
	Forbes	5.8%
	Other	8.2%

Manistee	Buchanan	31.5%
	Dole	56.5%
	Forbes	4.1%
	Other	8.0%

Marquette	Buchanan	36.1%
	Dole	51.8%
	Forbes	4.1%
	Other	8.0%

Mason	Buchanan	30.2%
	Dole	53.9%
	Forbes	4.6%
	Other	11.3%

Mecosta	Buchanan	33.5%
	Dole	55.8%
	Forbes	3.2%
	Other	7.6%

Menominee	Buchanan	30.7%
	Dole	55.2%
	Forbes	4.7%
	Other	9.4%

Midland	Buchanan	28.8%
	Dole	59.8%
	Forbes	3.9%
	Other	7.5%

Missaukee	Buchanan	32.0%
	Dole	55.3%
	Forbes	3.0%
	Other	9.7%

Monroe	Buchanan	36.3%
	Dole	47.7%
	Forbes	5.8%
	Other	10.2%

Montcalm	Buchanan	33.5%
	Dole	53.0%
	Forbes	3.2%
	Other	10.3%

Montmorency	Buchanan	33.8%
	Dole	54.1%
	Forbes	3.6%
	Other	8.5%

Muskegon	Buchanan	33.4%
	Dole	52.6%
	Forbes	3.3%
	Other	10.7%

Newaygo	Buchanan	35.6%
	Dole	49.3%
	Forbes	3.7%
	Other	11.4%

Oakland	Buchanan	29.5%
	Dole	53.1%
	Forbes	7.5%
	Other	9.9%

Oceana	Buchanan	36.3%
	Dole	51.8%
	Forbes	4.3%
	Other	7.6%

Ogemaw	Buchanan	42.3%
	Dole	47.0%
	Forbes	3.1%
	Other	7.5%

Ontonagon	Buchanan	37.8%
	Dole	49.8%
	Forbes	4.9%
	Other	7.5%

Osceola	Buchanan	33.2%
	Dole	54.7%
	Forbes	4.3%
	Other	7.8%

Oscoda	Buchanan	37.8%
	Dole	45.1%
	Forbes	3.2%
	Other	13.9%

Otsego	Buchanan	47.0%
	Dole	40.9%
	Forbes	4.2%
	Other	7.9%

Ottawa	Buchanan	29.5%
	Dole	57.7%
	Forbes	2.2%
	Other	10.6%

Presque Isle	Buchanan	38.8%
	Dole	47.7%
	Forbes	5.0%
	Other	8.5%

Roscommon	Buchanan	35.5%
	Dole	53.4%
	Forbes	4.7%
	Other	6.4%

Saginaw	Buchanan	38.8%
	Dole	52.6%
	Forbes	2.7%
	Other	6.0%

St. Clair	Buchanan	44.0%
	Dole	43.2%
	Forbes	4.8%
	Other	8.0%

St. Joseph	Buchanan	33.3%
	Dole	54.5%
	Forbes	2.7%
	Other	9.5%

Sanilac	Buchanan	39.2%
	Dole	50.7%
	Forbes	3.1%
	Other	6.9%

Schoolcraft	Buchanan	33.2%
	Dole	54.6%
	Forbes	4.3%
	Other	7.9%

Shiawassee	Buchanan	40.8%
	Dole	47.8%
	Forbes	3.6%
	Other	7.8%

Tuscola	Buchanan	50.1%
	Dole	40.9%
	Forbes	2.1%
	Other	6.9%

Van Buren	Buchanan	35.0%
	Dole	51.9%
	Forbes	3.7%
	Other	9.4%

Washtenaw	Buchanan	29.9%
	Dole	54.8%
	Forbes	4.9%
	Other	10.5%

Wayne	Buchanan	35.9%
	Dole	42.9%
	Forbes	6.4%
	Other	14.8%

Wexford	Buchanan	31.5%
	Dole	53.1%
	Forbes	4.7%
	Other	10.8%

National DataGraph for 1996 - Michigan Results for 1996

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved