Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2008-11-20

Map

Map

Alamance	Perdue	51.2%
	Snyder	47.3%
	Other	1.6%

Alexander	Perdue	43.5%
	Snyder	55.2%
	Other	1.3%

Alleghany	Perdue	54.5%
	Snyder	43.9%
	Other	1.6%

Anson	Perdue	72.8%
	Snyder	25.2%
	Other	2.0%

Ashe	Perdue	48.2%
	Snyder	50.0%
	Other	1.8%

Avery	Perdue	31.5%
	Snyder	66.4%
	Other	2.1%

Beaufort	Perdue	58.4%
	Snyder	40.2%
	Other	1.4%

Bertie	Perdue	76.8%
	Snyder	22.3%
	Other	1.0%

Bladen	Perdue	71.1%
	Snyder	27.6%
	Other	1.3%

Brunswick	Perdue	54.1%
	Snyder	44.3%
	Other	1.5%

Buncombe	Perdue	56.7%
	Snyder	40.5%
	Other	2.7%

Burke	Perdue	48.5%
	Snyder	49.4%
	Other	2.1%

Cabarrus	Perdue	44.8%
	Snyder	53.4%
	Other	1.8%

Caldwell	Perdue	44.4%
	Snyder	54.1%
	Other	1.5%

Camden	Perdue	48.8%
	Snyder	49.5%
	Other	1.7%

Carteret	Perdue	56.6%
	Snyder	41.9%
	Other	1.4%

Caswell	Perdue	63.1%
	Snyder	35.3%
	Other	1.6%

Catawba	Perdue	41.9%
	Snyder	56.8%
	Other	1.3%

Chatham	Perdue	62.0%
	Snyder	36.3%
	Other	1.7%

Cherokee	Perdue	41.2%
	Snyder	57.5%
	Other	1.3%

Chowan	Perdue	57.6%
	Snyder	38.7%
	Other	3.7%

Clay	Perdue	41.0%
	Snyder	57.3%
	Other	1.7%

Cleveland	Perdue	53.5%
	Snyder	44.9%
	Other	1.5%

Columbus	Perdue	71.5%
	Snyder	26.9%
	Other	1.5%

Craven	Perdue	61.4%
	Snyder	37.7%
	Other	0.9%

Cumberland	Perdue	63.0%
	Snyder	35.5%
	Other	1.5%

Currituck	Perdue	41.2%
	Snyder	55.5%
	Other	3.3%

Dare	Perdue	52.2%
	Snyder	45.0%
	Other	2.8%

Davidson	Perdue	37.3%
	Snyder	61.1%
	Other	1.6%

Davie	Perdue	35.8%
	Snyder	62.6%
	Other	1.6%

Duplin	Perdue	63.6%
	Snyder	35.4%
	Other	0.9%

Durham	Perdue	75.2%
	Snyder	23.1%
	Other	1.7%

Edgecombe	Perdue	77.5%
	Snyder	21.5%
	Other	1.0%

Forsyth	Perdue	54.5%
	Snyder	43.9%
	Other	1.6%

Franklin	Perdue	62.8%
	Snyder	35.7%
	Other	1.5%

Gaston	Perdue	43.5%
	Snyder	54.8%
	Other	1.7%

Gates	Perdue	62.9%
	Snyder	35.2%
	Other	1.9%

Graham	Perdue	43.3%
	Snyder	55.0%
	Other	1.7%

Granville	Perdue	66.5%
	Snyder	32.2%
	Other	1.3%

Greene	Perdue	65.8%
	Snyder	33.5%
	Other	0.7%

Guilford	Perdue	57.7%
	Snyder	40.7%
	Other	1.6%

Halifax	Perdue	76.3%
	Snyder	22.8%
	Other	0.9%

Harnett	Perdue	55.3%
	Snyder	43.3%
	Other	1.5%

Haywood	Perdue	57.5%
	Snyder	40.7%
	Other	1.8%

Henderson	Perdue	42.0%
	Snyder	56.5%
	Other	1.5%

Hertford	Perdue	74.6%
	Snyder	24.3%
	Other	1.2%

Hoke	Perdue	68.3%
	Snyder	29.8%
	Other	1.9%

Hyde	Perdue	68.3%
	Snyder	30.6%
	Other	1.1%

Iredell	Perdue	43.4%
	Snyder	55.0%
	Other	1.6%

Jackson	Perdue	56.1%
	Snyder	41.8%
	Other	2.1%

Johnston	Perdue	51.4%
	Snyder	47.4%
	Other	1.2%

Jones	Perdue	70.6%
	Snyder	28.6%
	Other	0.8%

Lee	Perdue	59.4%
	Snyder	39.2%
	Other	1.4%

Lenoir	Perdue	65.5%
	Snyder	34.0%
	Other	0.5%

Lincoln	Perdue	45.2%
	Snyder	53.2%
	Other	1.6%

McDowell	Perdue	46.1%
	Snyder	52.0%
	Other	2.0%

Macon	Perdue	44.9%
	Snyder	53.4%
	Other	1.8%

Madison	Perdue	53.7%
	Snyder	44.3%
	Other	2.0%

Martin	Perdue	74.9%
	Snyder	24.1%
	Other	1.0%

Mecklenburg	Perdue	56.9%
	Snyder	41.3%
	Other	1.8%

Mitchell	Perdue	32.5%
	Snyder	65.4%
	Other	2.1%

Montgomery	Perdue	59.0%
	Snyder	39.7%
	Other	1.3%

Moore	Perdue	48.0%
	Snyder	51.1%
	Other	0.9%

Nash	Perdue	61.1%
	Snyder	38.0%
	Other	1.0%

New Hanover	Perdue	54.9%
	Snyder	42.9%
	Other	2.2%

Northampton	Perdue	79.5%
	Snyder	19.7%
	Other	0.8%

Onslow	Perdue	51.8%
	Snyder	43.9%
	Other	4.3%

Orange	Perdue	72.8%
	Snyder	25.1%
	Other	2.1%

Pamlico	Perdue	66.8%
	Snyder	32.2%
	Other	1.0%

Pasquotank	Perdue	61.4%
	Snyder	36.8%
	Other	1.8%

Pender	Perdue	55.6%
	Snyder	42.9%
	Other	1.5%

Perquimans	Perdue	51.5%
	Snyder	46.4%
	Other	2.1%

Person	Perdue	62.5%
	Snyder	35.9%
	Other	1.5%

Pitt	Perdue	60.9%
	Snyder	38.2%
	Other	0.9%

Polk	Perdue	48.0%
	Snyder	49.9%
	Other	2.1%

Randolph	Perdue	37.2%
	Snyder	61.2%
	Other	1.6%

Richmond	Perdue	68.0%
	Snyder	30.4%
	Other	1.6%

Robeson	Perdue	72.6%
	Snyder	25.6%
	Other	1.8%

Rockingham	Perdue	54.1%
	Snyder	43.7%
	Other	2.2%

Rowan	Perdue	44.9%
	Snyder	53.1%
	Other	1.9%

Rutherford	Perdue	45.6%
	Snyder	52.5%
	Other	1.8%

Sampson	Perdue	58.6%
	Snyder	40.5%
	Other	0.8%

Scotland	Perdue	65.4%
	Snyder	33.2%
	Other	1.4%

Stanly	Perdue	44.2%
	Snyder	54.2%
	Other	1.6%

Stokes	Perdue	43.7%
	Snyder	54.8%
	Other	1.5%

Surry	Perdue	46.7%
	Snyder	51.6%
	Other	1.6%

Swain	Perdue	58.0%
	Snyder	40.3%
	Other	1.7%

Transylvania	Perdue	46.5%
	Snyder	51.4%
	Other	2.1%

Tyrrell	Perdue	65.3%
	Snyder	33.1%
	Other	1.6%

Union	Perdue	37.7%
	Snyder	61.2%
	Other	1.1%

Vance	Perdue	74.2%
	Snyder	24.8%
	Other	1.0%

Wake	Perdue	59.7%
	Snyder	38.5%
	Other	1.7%

Warren	Perdue	79.2%
	Snyder	20.0%
	Other	0.8%

Washington	Perdue	71.4%
	Snyder	27.5%
	Other	1.1%

Watauga	Perdue	51.1%
	Snyder	46.1%
	Other	2.8%

Wayne	Perdue	56.2%
	Snyder	43.0%
	Other	0.8%

Wilkes	Perdue	42.5%
	Snyder	55.8%
	Other	1.7%

Wilson	Perdue	62.5%
	Snyder	36.8%
	Other	0.7%

Yadkin	Perdue	38.2%
	Snyder	60.2%
	Other	1.6%

Yancey	Perdue	53.6%
	Snyder	44.6%
	Other	1.8%

National DataGraph for 2004 - North Carolina Results for 2004

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved