Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2009-01-31

Map

Map

Adams	Wagner	41.8%
	Beiler	52.5%
	Other	5.6%

Allegheny	Wagner	71.3%
	Beiler	25.7%
	Other	3.1%

Armstrong	Wagner	55.5%
	Beiler	40.7%
	Other	3.8%

Beaver	Wagner	64.3%
	Beiler	31.1%
	Other	4.5%

Bedford	Wagner	37.0%
	Beiler	58.2%
	Other	4.8%

Berks	Wagner	55.3%
	Beiler	41.2%
	Other	3.5%

Blair	Wagner	43.6%
	Beiler	52.2%
	Other	4.3%

Bradford	Wagner	38.9%
	Beiler	55.5%
	Other	5.6%

Bucks	Wagner	53.9%
	Beiler	44.1%
	Other	2.0%

Butler	Wagner	48.5%
	Beiler	47.4%
	Other	4.1%

Cambria	Wagner	67.9%
	Beiler	28.2%
	Other	4.0%

Cameron	Wagner	50.4%
	Beiler	45.1%
	Other	4.5%

Carbon	Wagner	55.2%
	Beiler	39.2%
	Other	5.6%

Centre	Wagner	56.3%
	Beiler	38.3%
	Other	5.3%

Chester	Wagner	49.4%
	Beiler	46.4%
	Other	4.2%

Clarion	Wagner	50.2%
	Beiler	44.8%
	Other	5.0%

Clearfield	Wagner	54.1%
	Beiler	40.9%
	Other	5.0%

Clinton	Wagner	53.0%
	Beiler	42.2%
	Other	4.8%

Columbia	Wagner	51.6%
	Beiler	43.2%
	Other	5.2%

Crawford	Wagner	51.5%
	Beiler	44.5%
	Other	4.0%

Cumberland	Wagner	43.1%
	Beiler	52.7%
	Other	4.2%

Dauphin	Wagner	56.0%
	Beiler	42.0%
	Other	2.0%

Delaware	Wagner	57.7%
	Beiler	40.7%
	Other	1.6%

Elk	Wagner	66.1%
	Beiler	29.6%
	Other	4.3%

Erie	Wagner	64.9%
	Beiler	30.9%
	Other	4.2%

Fayette	Wagner	69.6%
	Beiler	27.1%
	Other	3.3%

Forest	Wagner	51.5%
	Beiler	43.1%
	Other	5.4%

Franklin	Wagner	35.6%
	Beiler	59.1%
	Other	5.3%

Fulton	Wagner	34.1%
	Beiler	60.8%
	Other	5.2%

Greene	Wagner	68.4%
	Beiler	27.5%
	Other	4.1%

Huntingdon	Wagner	41.7%
	Beiler	53.2%
	Other	5.0%

Indiana	Wagner	58.1%
	Beiler	37.2%
	Other	4.7%

Jefferson	Wagner	45.3%
	Beiler	49.4%
	Other	5.3%

Juniata	Wagner	36.4%
	Beiler	58.2%
	Other	5.5%

Lackawanna	Wagner	68.7%
	Beiler	26.6%
	Other	4.7%

Lancaster	Wagner	38.9%
	Beiler	57.8%
	Other	3.3%

Lawrence	Wagner	60.4%
	Beiler	35.8%
	Other	3.8%

Lebanon	Wagner	41.2%
	Beiler	54.8%
	Other	4.0%

Lehigh	Wagner	57.7%
	Beiler	38.7%
	Other	3.6%

Luzerne	Wagner	61.6%
	Beiler	33.2%
	Other	5.2%

Lycoming	Wagner	41.3%
	Beiler	54.4%
	Other	4.3%

McKean	Wagner	41.6%
	Beiler	54.3%
	Other	4.1%

Mercer	Wagner	55.9%
	Beiler	40.1%
	Other	3.9%

Mifflin	Wagner	37.4%
	Beiler	58.6%
	Other	4.0%

Monroe	Wagner	59.3%
	Beiler	38.1%
	Other	2.5%

Montgomery	Wagner	58.5%
	Beiler	40.5%
	Other	1.1%

Montour	Wagner	47.3%
	Beiler	46.9%
	Other	5.8%

Northampton	Wagner	58.3%
	Beiler	40.1%
	Other	1.6%

Northumberland	Wagner	47.5%
	Beiler	46.4%
	Other	6.2%

Perry	Wagner	29.3%
	Beiler	45.7%
	Other	25.1%

Philadelphia	Wagner	85.2%
	Beiler	13.9%
	Other	1.0%

Pike	Wagner	48.5%
	Beiler	47.7%
	Other	3.8%

Potter	Wagner	34.6%
	Beiler	60.6%
	Other	4.7%

Schuylkill	Wagner	52.3%
	Beiler	42.8%
	Other	4.9%

Snyder	Wagner	36.4%
	Beiler	58.7%
	Other	4.9%

Somerset	Wagner	53.0%
	Beiler	42.8%
	Other	4.1%

Sullivan	Wagner	43.1%
	Beiler	51.0%
	Other	5.9%

Susquehanna	Wagner	43.3%
	Beiler	49.9%
	Other	6.8%

Tioga	Wagner	35.5%
	Beiler	59.2%
	Other	5.3%

Union	Wagner	43.2%
	Beiler	52.7%
	Other	4.0%

Venango	Wagner	47.5%
	Beiler	46.7%
	Other	5.8%

Warren	Wagner	49.5%
	Beiler	45.1%
	Other	5.4%

Washington	Wagner	64.0%
	Beiler	32.4%
	Other	3.5%

Wayne	Wagner	43.5%
	Beiler	50.7%
	Other	5.8%

Westmoreland	Wagner	59.3%
	Beiler	37.4%
	Other	3.3%

Wyoming	Wagner	46.0%
	Beiler	48.3%
	Other	5.7%

York	Wagner	43.2%
	Beiler	52.1%
	Other	4.6%

National DataGraph for 2008 - Pennsylvania Results for 2008

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved