Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2011-01-15

Map

Map

Adair	Mauro	42.8%
	Shultz	53.4%
	Other	3.7%

Adams	Mauro	41.5%
	Shultz	54.2%
	Other	4.3%

Allamakee	Mauro	41.2%
	Shultz	54.8%
	Other	3.9%

Appanoose	Mauro	41.9%
	Shultz	54.4%
	Other	3.7%

Audubon	Mauro	42.9%
	Shultz	54.0%
	Other	3.1%

Benton	Mauro	43.6%
	Shultz	53.1%
	Other	3.3%

Black Hawk	Mauro	52.0%
	Shultz	45.1%
	Other	2.9%

Boone	Mauro	51.2%
	Shultz	45.5%
	Other	3.4%

Bremer	Mauro	44.6%
	Shultz	52.8%
	Other	2.6%

Buchanan	Mauro	49.6%
	Shultz	46.6%
	Other	3.8%

Buena Vista	Mauro	35.5%
	Shultz	61.9%
	Other	2.6%

Butler	Mauro	35.1%
	Shultz	61.7%
	Other	3.3%

Calhoun	Mauro	41.7%
	Shultz	55.2%
	Other	3.1%

Carroll	Mauro	48.3%
	Shultz	49.0%
	Other	2.8%

Cass	Mauro	31.6%
	Shultz	65.1%
	Other	3.2%

Cedar	Mauro	42.4%
	Shultz	54.2%
	Other	3.3%

Cerro Gordo	Mauro	49.7%
	Shultz	46.8%
	Other	3.5%

Cherokee	Mauro	36.0%
	Shultz	60.5%
	Other	3.5%

Chickasaw	Mauro	49.5%
	Shultz	47.3%
	Other	3.2%

Clarke	Mauro	47.2%
	Shultz	48.5%
	Other	4.3%

Clay	Mauro	33.9%
	Shultz	62.8%
	Other	3.3%

Clayton	Mauro	45.5%
	Shultz	50.8%
	Other	3.8%

Clinton	Mauro	48.2%
	Shultz	48.4%
	Other	3.4%

Crawford	Mauro	34.3%
	Shultz	62.3%
	Other	3.4%

Dallas	Mauro	43.7%
	Shultz	53.6%
	Other	2.6%

Davis	Mauro	42.6%
	Shultz	52.6%
	Other	4.8%

Decatur	Mauro	45.2%
	Shultz	50.4%
	Other	4.4%

Delaware	Mauro	39.7%
	Shultz	56.9%
	Other	3.4%

Des Moines	Mauro	50.2%
	Shultz	46.2%
	Other	3.6%

Dickinson	Mauro	36.7%
	Shultz	60.7%
	Other	2.6%

Dubuque	Mauro	51.3%
	Shultz	45.5%
	Other	3.2%

Emmet	Mauro	42.1%
	Shultz	54.2%
	Other	3.6%

Fayette	Mauro	47.3%
	Shultz	49.3%
	Other	3.4%

Floyd	Mauro	50.6%
	Shultz	45.4%
	Other	4.0%

Franklin	Mauro	37.1%
	Shultz	59.5%
	Other	3.4%

Fremont	Mauro	33.9%
	Shultz	61.8%
	Other	4.3%

Greene	Mauro	47.0%
	Shultz	50.2%
	Other	2.8%

Grundy	Mauro	31.5%
	Shultz	66.3%
	Other	2.3%

Guthrie	Mauro	44.3%
	Shultz	52.0%
	Other	3.7%

Hamilton	Mauro	45.3%
	Shultz	51.3%
	Other	3.4%

Hancock	Mauro	36.5%
	Shultz	59.6%
	Other	3.9%

Hardin	Mauro	43.0%
	Shultz	54.5%
	Other	2.5%

Harrison	Mauro	33.2%
	Shultz	62.6%
	Other	4.2%

Henry	Mauro	35.6%
	Shultz	61.3%
	Other	3.1%

Howard	Mauro	51.1%
	Shultz	44.6%
	Other	4.2%

Humboldt	Mauro	38.8%
	Shultz	58.6%
	Other	2.7%

Ida	Mauro	27.1%
	Shultz	70.7%
	Other	2.2%

Iowa	Mauro	38.9%
	Shultz	57.9%
	Other	3.2%

Jackson	Mauro	51.3%
	Shultz	44.7%
	Other	4.0%

Jasper	Mauro	51.8%
	Shultz	45.0%
	Other	3.2%

Jefferson	Mauro	51.8%
	Shultz	43.9%
	Other	4.3%

Johnson	Mauro	62.0%
	Shultz	34.1%
	Other	3.9%

Jones	Mauro	45.5%
	Shultz	50.6%
	Other	4.0%

Keokuk	Mauro	38.7%
	Shultz	57.6%
	Other	3.7%

Kossuth	Mauro	45.3%
	Shultz	51.6%
	Other	3.1%

Lee	Mauro	49.1%
	Shultz	46.4%
	Other	4.5%

Linn	Mauro	51.5%
	Shultz	45.2%
	Other	3.3%

Louisa	Mauro	34.4%
	Shultz	61.7%
	Other	3.9%

Lucas	Mauro	44.5%
	Shultz	52.3%
	Other	3.3%

Lyon	Mauro	17.2%
	Shultz	79.9%
	Other	3.0%

Madison	Mauro	43.9%
	Shultz	52.8%
	Other	3.4%

Mahaska	Mauro	36.8%
	Shultz	60.8%
	Other	2.4%

Marion	Mauro	40.0%
	Shultz	56.7%
	Other	3.2%

Marshall	Mauro	48.2%
	Shultz	48.7%
	Other	3.1%

Mills	Mauro	27.7%
	Shultz	68.2%
	Other	4.1%

Mitchell	Mauro	44.7%
	Shultz	52.2%
	Other	3.1%

Monona	Mauro	38.2%
	Shultz	58.7%
	Other	3.1%

Monroe	Mauro	45.1%
	Shultz	51.6%
	Other	3.2%

Montgomery	Mauro	27.7%
	Shultz	68.2%
	Other	4.2%

Muscatine	Mauro	43.1%
	Shultz	53.4%
	Other	3.5%

O'Brien	Mauro	21.4%
	Shultz	76.4%
	Other	2.3%

Osceola	Mauro	19.5%
	Shultz	77.2%
	Other	3.4%

Page	Mauro	25.9%
	Shultz	71.2%
	Other	2.9%

Palo Alto	Mauro	46.1%
	Shultz	50.5%
	Other	3.4%

Plymouth	Mauro	26.4%
	Shultz	70.9%
	Other	2.6%

Pocahontas	Mauro	38.0%
	Shultz	58.9%
	Other	3.1%

Polk	Mauro	57.6%
	Shultz	39.9%
	Other	2.4%

Pottawattamie	Mauro	35.8%
	Shultz	60.6%
	Other	3.6%

Poweshiek	Mauro	52.3%
	Shultz	45.1%
	Other	2.6%

Ringgold	Mauro	45.2%
	Shultz	51.8%
	Other	3.0%

Sac	Mauro	35.2%
	Shultz	62.2%
	Other	2.6%

Scott	Mauro	45.0%
	Shultz	51.8%
	Other	3.2%

Shelby	Mauro	30.3%
	Shultz	66.3%
	Other	3.4%

Sioux	Mauro	11.1%
	Shultz	87.5%
	Other	1.4%

Story	Mauro	52.4%
	Shultz	44.1%
	Other	3.6%

Tama	Mauro	45.9%
	Shultz	50.6%
	Other	3.5%

Taylor	Mauro	38.6%
	Shultz	57.3%
	Other	4.1%

Union	Mauro	44.5%
	Shultz	51.7%
	Other	3.9%

Van Buren	Mauro	33.4%
	Shultz	62.7%
	Other	3.9%

Wapello	Mauro	52.3%
	Shultz	43.6%
	Other	4.1%

Warren	Mauro	50.1%
	Shultz	47.2%
	Other	2.7%

Washington	Mauro	39.1%
	Shultz	57.6%
	Other	3.3%

Wayne	Mauro	42.0%
	Shultz	54.1%
	Other	4.0%

Webster	Mauro	48.5%
	Shultz	48.2%
	Other	3.4%

Winnebago	Mauro	41.5%
	Shultz	54.7%
	Other	3.8%

Winneshiek	Mauro	47.6%
	Shultz	48.9%
	Other	3.5%

Woodbury	Mauro	42.3%
	Shultz	54.5%
	Other	3.2%

Worth	Mauro	50.9%
	Shultz	45.1%
	Other	4.0%

Wright	Mauro	40.7%
	Shultz	56.8%
	Other	2.5%

National DataGraph for 2010 - Iowa Results for 2010

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved