Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Adair	Rogers	31.2%
	Coburn	65.9%
	Wallace	2.4%
	Other	0.6%

Alfalfa	Rogers	14.1%
	Coburn	82.2%
	Wallace	2.7%
	Other	1.0%

Atoka	Rogers	29.6%
	Coburn	66.7%
	Wallace	3.1%
	Other	0.6%

Beaver	Rogers	8.8%
	Coburn	87.7%
	Wallace	3.1%
	Other	0.4%

Beckham	Rogers	19.6%
	Coburn	78.1%
	Wallace	1.9%
	Other	0.5%

Blaine	Rogers	19.4%
	Coburn	77.7%
	Wallace	1.9%
	Other	0.9%

Bryan	Rogers	29.7%
	Coburn	67.1%
	Wallace	2.4%
	Other	0.7%

Caddo	Rogers	30.3%
	Coburn	66.7%
	Wallace	2.1%
	Other	0.9%

Canadian	Rogers	16.4%
	Coburn	80.8%
	Wallace	2.3%
	Other	0.6%

Carter	Rogers	25.8%
	Coburn	71.0%
	Wallace	2.4%
	Other	0.8%

Cherokee	Rogers	35.0%
	Coburn	61.9%
	Wallace	2.2%
	Other	0.9%

Choctaw	Rogers	32.8%
	Coburn	63.3%
	Wallace	2.8%
	Other	1.1%

Cimarron	Rogers	11.0%
	Coburn	85.8%
	Wallace	2.5%
	Other	0.7%

Cleveland	Rogers	28.0%
	Coburn	68.0%
	Wallace	3.1%
	Other	0.8%

Coal	Rogers	34.9%
	Coburn	62.6%
	Wallace	1.6%
	Other	0.9%

Comanche	Rogers	28.7%
	Coburn	67.8%
	Wallace	2.7%
	Other	0.9%

Cotton	Rogers	26.3%
	Coburn	69.6%
	Wallace	2.2%
	Other	1.9%

Craig	Rogers	27.7%
	Coburn	69.2%
	Wallace	2.3%
	Other	0.8%

Creek	Rogers	21.8%
	Coburn	75.1%
	Wallace	2.3%
	Other	0.8%

Custer	Rogers	18.2%
	Coburn	79.5%
	Wallace	1.8%
	Other	0.5%

Delaware	Rogers	23.1%
	Coburn	73.5%
	Wallace	2.6%
	Other	0.8%

Dewey	Rogers	15.2%
	Coburn	82.3%
	Wallace	1.7%
	Other	0.8%

Ellis	Rogers	13.5%
	Coburn	84.3%
	Wallace	1.8%
	Other	0.4%

Garfield	Rogers	16.7%
	Coburn	80.2%
	Wallace	2.4%
	Other	0.7%

Garvin	Rogers	25.9%
	Coburn	70.2%
	Wallace	3.1%
	Other	0.8%

Grady	Rogers	20.8%
	Coburn	75.7%
	Wallace	2.8%
	Other	0.7%

Grant	Rogers	17.5%
	Coburn	78.8%
	Wallace	3.0%
	Other	0.7%

Greer	Rogers	26.8%
	Coburn	69.6%
	Wallace	2.5%
	Other	1.0%

Harmon	Rogers	26.5%
	Coburn	70.5%
	Wallace	2.5%
	Other	0.4%

Harper	Rogers	11.2%
	Coburn	85.9%
	Wallace	2.6%
	Other	0.2%

Haskell	Rogers	30.4%
	Coburn	67.0%
	Wallace	1.7%
	Other	0.9%

Hughes	Rogers	30.8%
	Coburn	65.9%
	Wallace	2.5%
	Other	0.8%

Jackson	Rogers	19.3%
	Coburn	78.0%
	Wallace	2.2%
	Other	0.6%

Jefferson	Rogers	31.4%
	Coburn	65.0%
	Wallace	2.7%
	Other	0.9%

Johnston	Rogers	31.5%
	Coburn	64.5%
	Wallace	2.8%
	Other	1.1%

Kay	Rogers	23.6%
	Coburn	72.7%
	Wallace	2.6%
	Other	1.1%

Kingfisher	Rogers	11.6%
	Coburn	86.3%
	Wallace	1.4%
	Other	0.7%

Kiowa	Rogers	26.7%
	Coburn	71.0%
	Wallace	1.8%
	Other	0.5%

Latimer	Rogers	31.8%
	Coburn	64.4%
	Wallace	2.7%
	Other	1.1%

Le Flore	Rogers	34.6%
	Coburn	61.7%
	Wallace	2.9%
	Other	0.8%

Lincoln	Rogers	21.2%
	Coburn	75.3%
	Wallace	2.6%
	Other	0.8%

Logan	Rogers	20.1%
	Coburn	77.0%
	Wallace	2.2%
	Other	0.8%

Love	Rogers	29.9%
	Coburn	66.3%
	Wallace	2.7%
	Other	1.1%

McClain	Rogers	19.3%
	Coburn	77.9%
	Wallace	2.2%
	Other	0.6%

McCurtain	Rogers	27.7%
	Coburn	68.4%
	Wallace	3.1%
	Other	0.8%

McIntosh	Rogers	33.0%
	Coburn	64.2%
	Wallace	1.9%
	Other	0.9%

Major	Rogers	11.8%
	Coburn	85.8%
	Wallace	1.8%
	Other	0.5%

Marshall	Rogers	26.4%
	Coburn	70.3%
	Wallace	2.7%
	Other	0.7%

Mayes	Rogers	28.2%
	Coburn	68.6%
	Wallace	2.4%
	Other	0.7%

Murray	Rogers	27.8%
	Coburn	68.6%
	Wallace	2.9%
	Other	0.7%

Muskogee	Rogers	31.3%
	Coburn	66.1%
	Wallace	2.0%
	Other	0.6%

Noble	Rogers	17.4%
	Coburn	79.1%
	Wallace	2.5%
	Other	1.0%

Nowata	Rogers	25.6%
	Coburn	71.0%
	Wallace	2.7%
	Other	0.6%

Okfuskee	Rogers	30.6%
	Coburn	66.5%
	Wallace	2.0%
	Other	0.8%

Oklahoma	Rogers	30.2%
	Coburn	66.6%
	Wallace	2.5%
	Other	0.8%

Okmulgee	Rogers	34.0%
	Coburn	63.2%
	Wallace	1.9%
	Other	0.8%

Osage	Rogers	32.6%
	Coburn	64.2%
	Wallace	2.4%
	Other	0.8%

Ottawa	Rogers	30.6%
	Coburn	65.5%
	Wallace	2.9%
	Other	1.0%

Pawnee	Rogers	25.2%
	Coburn	71.0%
	Wallace	2.7%
	Other	1.1%

Payne	Rogers	26.9%
	Coburn	69.5%
	Wallace	2.6%
	Other	1.0%

Pittsburg	Rogers	31.2%
	Coburn	65.5%
	Wallace	2.3%
	Other	1.0%

Pontotoc	Rogers	26.4%
	Coburn	70.5%
	Wallace	2.5%
	Other	0.6%

Pottawatomie	Rogers	24.1%
	Coburn	72.5%
	Wallace	2.5%
	Other	0.9%

Pushmataha	Rogers	31.5%
	Coburn	63.3%
	Wallace	4.1%
	Other	1.0%

Roger Mills	Rogers	14.4%
	Coburn	83.1%
	Wallace	1.8%
	Other	0.7%

Rogers	Rogers	20.4%
	Coburn	76.7%
	Wallace	2.2%
	Other	0.7%

Seminole	Rogers	29.2%
	Coburn	67.6%
	Wallace	2.4%
	Other	0.9%

Sequoyah	Rogers	31.1%
	Coburn	65.5%
	Wallace	2.5%
	Other	0.9%

Stephens	Rogers	23.5%
	Coburn	73.5%
	Wallace	2.4%
	Other	0.7%

Texas	Rogers	11.3%
	Coburn	84.4%
	Wallace	3.3%
	Other	0.9%

Tillman	Rogers	28.4%
	Coburn	68.5%
	Wallace	2.1%
	Other	1.0%

Tulsa	Rogers	26.6%
	Coburn	70.3%
	Wallace	2.4%
	Other	0.7%

Wagoner	Rogers	20.5%
	Coburn	76.8%
	Wallace	2.1%
	Other	0.6%

Washington	Rogers	18.7%
	Coburn	78.2%
	Wallace	2.3%
	Other	0.7%

Washita	Rogers	19.3%
	Coburn	77.7%
	Wallace	2.4%
	Other	0.6%

Woods	Rogers	17.1%
	Coburn	80.1%
	Wallace	2.1%
	Other	0.7%

Woodward	Rogers	13.3%
	Coburn	84.0%
	Wallace	2.0%
	Other	0.7%

National DataGraph for 2010 - Oklahoma Results for 2010

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved