Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2014-07-11

Map

Map

Adair	Wright	17.8%
	Lamb	50.0%
	Nosak	2.5%
	Other	29.7%

Alfalfa	Wright	12.7%
	Lamb	79.4%
	Nosak	2.2%
	Other	5.7%

Atoka	Wright	26.8%
	Lamb	40.5%
	Nosak	11.0%
	Other	21.6%

Beaver	Wright	18.4%
	Lamb	63.5%
	Nosak	3.1%
	Other	15.0%

Beckham	Wright	16.8%
	Lamb	69.0%
	Nosak	2.5%
	Other	11.6%

Blaine	Wright	14.2%
	Lamb	75.7%
	Nosak	1.9%
	Other	8.2%

Bryan	Wright	29.0%
	Lamb	40.4%
	Nosak	9.5%
	Other	21.1%

Caddo	Wright	12.8%
	Lamb	71.3%
	Nosak	4.6%
	Other	11.4%

Canadian	Wright	16.6%
	Lamb	70.7%
	Nosak	4.6%
	Other	8.1%

Carter	Wright	23.8%
	Lamb	54.3%
	Nosak	4.3%
	Other	17.6%

Cherokee	Wright	17.1%
	Lamb	64.1%
	Nosak	5.8%
	Other	13.0%

Choctaw	Wright	49.0%
	Lamb	27.0%
	Nosak	4.6%
	Other	19.4%

Cimarron	Wright	29.9%
	Lamb	51.2%
	Nosak	2.4%
	Other	16.5%

Cleveland	Wright	15.0%
	Lamb	71.0%
	Nosak	4.2%
	Other	9.7%

Coal	Wright	19.5%
	Lamb	46.6%
	Nosak	11.9%
	Other	22.0%

Comanche	Wright	17.1%
	Lamb	64.8%
	Nosak	5.6%
	Other	12.5%

Cotton	Wright	20.2%
	Lamb	66.1%
	Nosak	2.4%
	Other	11.3%

Craig	Wright	21.8%
	Lamb	60.4%
	Nosak	5.6%
	Other	12.2%

Creek	Wright	22.1%
	Lamb	59.9%
	Nosak	10.7%
	Other	7.3%

Custer	Wright	20.5%
	Lamb	69.8%
	Nosak	1.6%
	Other	8.0%

Delaware	Wright	31.7%
	Lamb	54.2%
	Nosak	3.8%
	Other	10.3%

Dewey	Wright	15.6%
	Lamb	72.9%
	Nosak	2.7%
	Other	8.8%

Ellis	Wright	14.1%
	Lamb	75.4%
	Nosak	3.6%
	Other	6.9%

Garfield	Wright	10.5%
	Lamb	82.9%
	Nosak	2.0%
	Other	4.5%

Garvin	Wright	15.9%
	Lamb	68.7%
	Nosak	6.5%
	Other	9.0%

Grady	Wright	13.6%
	Lamb	71.7%
	Nosak	6.3%
	Other	8.3%

Grant	Wright	13.3%
	Lamb	77.5%
	Nosak	3.1%
	Other	6.1%

Greer	Wright	16.8%
	Lamb	72.3%
	Nosak	2.9%
	Other	8.0%

Harmon	Wright	25.8%
	Lamb	53.2%
	Nosak	3.2%
	Other	17.7%

Harper	Wright	13.8%
	Lamb	76.8%
	Nosak	2.2%
	Other	7.2%

Haskell	Wright	25.5%
	Lamb	63.3%
	Nosak	1.2%
	Other	10.0%

Hughes	Wright	20.1%
	Lamb	63.5%
	Nosak	2.8%
	Other	13.5%

Jackson	Wright	21.3%
	Lamb	63.3%
	Nosak	5.5%
	Other	9.9%

Jefferson	Wright	22.6%
	Lamb	57.0%
	Nosak	4.8%
	Other	15.6%

Johnston	Wright	32.2%
	Lamb	46.3%
	Nosak	9.0%
	Other	12.4%

Kay	Wright	17.4%
	Lamb	65.9%
	Nosak	5.2%
	Other	11.5%

Kingfisher	Wright	9.9%
	Lamb	82.6%
	Nosak	2.0%
	Other	5.5%

Kiowa	Wright	14.1%
	Lamb	67.9%
	Nosak	4.8%
	Other	13.1%

Latimer	Wright	21.0%
	Lamb	55.1%
	Nosak	13.2%
	Other	10.8%

Le Flore	Wright	35.3%
	Lamb	39.3%
	Nosak	5.0%
	Other	20.4%

Lincoln	Wright	16.9%
	Lamb	70.8%
	Nosak	3.3%
	Other	9.1%

Logan	Wright	16.3%
	Lamb	74.4%
	Nosak	2.9%
	Other	6.5%

Love	Wright	30.9%
	Lamb	40.6%
	Nosak	5.5%
	Other	23.0%

McClain	Wright	17.0%
	Lamb	71.2%
	Nosak	4.0%
	Other	7.8%

McCurtain	Wright	28.0%
	Lamb	44.8%
	Nosak	8.5%
	Other	18.7%

McIntosh	Wright	20.5%
	Lamb	59.8%
	Nosak	8.6%
	Other	11.1%

Major	Wright	16.2%
	Lamb	75.1%
	Nosak	2.0%
	Other	6.7%

Marshall	Wright	26.7%
	Lamb	41.9%
	Nosak	6.0%
	Other	25.4%

Mayes	Wright	20.4%
	Lamb	64.0%
	Nosak	6.5%
	Other	9.0%

Murray	Wright	16.0%
	Lamb	70.0%
	Nosak	3.5%
	Other	10.5%

Muskogee	Wright	24.5%
	Lamb	59.1%
	Nosak	6.5%
	Other	10.0%

Noble	Wright	13.8%
	Lamb	73.0%
	Nosak	4.6%
	Other	8.6%

Nowata	Wright	15.2%
	Lamb	70.1%
	Nosak	6.3%
	Other	8.4%

Okfuskee	Wright	18.7%
	Lamb	59.7%
	Nosak	11.6%
	Other	10.0%

Oklahoma	Wright	12.8%
	Lamb	77.2%
	Nosak	2.8%
	Other	7.2%

Okmulgee	Wright	23.9%
	Lamb	49.0%
	Nosak	16.3%
	Other	10.8%

Osage	Wright	17.5%
	Lamb	59.5%
	Nosak	10.2%
	Other	12.8%

Ottawa	Wright	30.0%
	Lamb	36.6%
	Nosak	12.2%
	Other	21.2%

Pawnee	Wright	16.5%
	Lamb	59.4%
	Nosak	9.8%
	Other	14.4%

Payne	Wright	14.3%
	Lamb	64.5%
	Nosak	7.4%
	Other	13.9%

Pittsburg	Wright	18.2%
	Lamb	57.0%
	Nosak	9.4%
	Other	15.4%

Pontotoc	Wright	15.1%
	Lamb	68.8%
	Nosak	5.5%
	Other	10.7%

Pottawatomie	Wright	16.8%
	Lamb	67.1%
	Nosak	2.8%
	Other	13.3%

Pushmataha	Wright	29.8%
	Lamb	29.8%
	Nosak	16.3%
	Other	24.2%

Roger Mills	Wright	23.8%
	Lamb	64.0%
	Nosak	2.5%
	Other	9.6%

Rogers	Wright	17.5%
	Lamb	59.3%
	Nosak	12.2%
	Other	10.9%

Seminole	Wright	20.4%
	Lamb	63.0%
	Nosak	5.1%
	Other	11.4%

Sequoyah	Wright	27.8%
	Lamb	39.2%
	Nosak	7.7%
	Other	25.3%

Stephens	Wright	13.2%
	Lamb	72.3%
	Nosak	4.2%
	Other	10.3%

Texas	Wright	23.7%
	Lamb	51.5%
	Nosak	6.7%
	Other	18.2%

Tillman	Wright	16.1%
	Lamb	64.4%
	Nosak	6.8%
	Other	12.7%

Tulsa	Wright	22.6%
	Lamb	57.6%
	Nosak	10.2%
	Other	9.7%

Wagoner	Wright	26.2%
	Lamb	51.5%
	Nosak	11.8%
	Other	10.6%

Washington	Wright	14.5%
	Lamb	66.8%
	Nosak	6.6%
	Other	12.1%

Washita	Wright	14.7%
	Lamb	73.4%
	Nosak	3.8%
	Other	8.1%

Woods	Wright	12.1%
	Lamb	74.7%
	Nosak	4.8%
	Other	8.3%

Woodward	Wright	11.7%
	Lamb	78.3%
	Nosak	1.6%
	Other	8.4%

National DataGraph for 2010 - Oklahoma Results for 2010

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved