Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2015-01-05

Map

Map

Albany	Schneiderman	56.1%
	Cahill	39.9%
	Other	3.9%

Allegany	Schneiderman	29.3%
	Cahill	68.0%
	Other	2.7%

Bronx	Schneiderman	87.7%
	Cahill	9.6%
	Other	2.7%

Broome	Schneiderman	43.1%
	Cahill	53.8%
	Other	3.1%

Cattaraugus	Schneiderman	36.8%
	Cahill	60.6%
	Other	2.6%

Cayuga	Schneiderman	40.7%
	Cahill	56.4%
	Other	2.8%

Chautauqua	Schneiderman	39.9%
	Cahill	57.7%
	Other	2.4%

Chemung	Schneiderman	32.6%
	Cahill	64.9%
	Other	2.5%

Chenango	Schneiderman	34.4%
	Cahill	61.4%
	Other	4.2%

Clinton	Schneiderman	48.6%
	Cahill	48.4%
	Other	3.0%

Columbia	Schneiderman	47.6%
	Cahill	48.7%
	Other	3.8%

Cortland	Schneiderman	40.0%
	Cahill	56.3%
	Other	3.7%

Delaware	Schneiderman	36.0%
	Cahill	60.4%
	Other	3.7%

Dutchess	Schneiderman	49.4%
	Cahill	47.8%
	Other	2.8%

Erie	Schneiderman	52.2%
	Cahill	45.2%
	Other	2.6%

Essex	Schneiderman	42.7%
	Cahill	53.0%
	Other	4.3%

Franklin	Schneiderman	46.4%
	Cahill	50.4%
	Other	3.2%

Fulton	Schneiderman	35.5%
	Cahill	62.0%
	Other	2.6%

Genesee	Schneiderman	29.3%
	Cahill	67.8%
	Other	2.9%

Greene	Schneiderman	37.1%
	Cahill	59.8%
	Other	3.1%

Hamilton	Schneiderman	31.0%
	Cahill	66.6%
	Other	2.3%

Herkimer	Schneiderman	32.7%
	Cahill	63.8%
	Other	3.5%

Jefferson	Schneiderman	38.4%
	Cahill	59.1%
	Other	2.4%

Kings	Schneiderman	82.2%
	Cahill	14.3%
	Other	3.5%

Lewis	Schneiderman	32.9%
	Cahill	64.2%
	Other	2.9%

Livingston	Schneiderman	32.7%
	Cahill	64.4%
	Other	2.9%

Madison	Schneiderman	38.7%
	Cahill	57.8%
	Other	3.6%

Monroe	Schneiderman	48.3%
	Cahill	48.7%
	Other	3.0%

Montgomery	Schneiderman	42.8%
	Cahill	54.4%
	Other	2.8%

Nassau	Schneiderman	49.9%
	Cahill	48.5%
	Other	1.6%

New York	Schneiderman	82.5%
	Cahill	13.8%
	Other	3.8%

Niagara	Schneiderman	43.1%
	Cahill	54.5%
	Other	2.4%

Oneida	Schneiderman	38.0%
	Cahill	58.8%
	Other	3.1%

Onondaga	Schneiderman	46.8%
	Cahill	49.9%
	Other	3.3%

Ontario	Schneiderman	38.8%
	Cahill	58.4%
	Other	2.9%

Orange	Schneiderman	49.3%
	Cahill	47.8%
	Other	2.9%

Orleans	Schneiderman	27.4%
	Cahill	69.4%
	Other	3.2%

Oswego	Schneiderman	36.7%
	Cahill	60.1%
	Other	3.2%

Otsego	Schneiderman	42.4%
	Cahill	53.4%
	Other	4.2%

Putnam	Schneiderman	45.6%
	Cahill	52.2%
	Other	2.2%

Queens	Schneiderman	76.0%
	Cahill	21.0%
	Other	2.9%

Rensselaer	Schneiderman	45.9%
	Cahill	50.6%
	Other	3.5%

Richmond	Schneiderman	52.7%
	Cahill	45.4%
	Other	1.9%

Rockland	Schneiderman	55.8%
	Cahill	42.3%
	Other	1.9%

St. Lawrence	Schneiderman	46.0%
	Cahill	50.8%
	Other	3.2%

Saratoga	Schneiderman	41.3%
	Cahill	55.5%
	Other	3.2%

Schenectady	Schneiderman	49.2%
	Cahill	47.3%
	Other	3.5%

Schoharie	Schneiderman	37.1%
	Cahill	59.5%
	Other	3.4%

Schuyler	Schneiderman	31.9%
	Cahill	63.7%
	Other	4.4%

Seneca	Schneiderman	41.0%
	Cahill	55.3%
	Other	3.7%

Steuben	Schneiderman	27.0%
	Cahill	70.3%
	Other	2.7%

Suffolk	Schneiderman	47.4%
	Cahill	50.3%
	Other	2.3%

Sullivan	Schneiderman	47.7%
	Cahill	49.1%
	Other	3.3%

Tioga	Schneiderman	40.6%
	Cahill	54.8%
	Other	4.6%

Tompkins	Schneiderman	62.0%
	Cahill	30.4%
	Other	7.6%

Ulster	Schneiderman	52.9%
	Cahill	42.6%
	Other	4.5%

Warren	Schneiderman	37.5%
	Cahill	58.2%
	Other	4.3%

Washington	Schneiderman	37.6%
	Cahill	58.3%
	Other	4.2%

Wayne	Schneiderman	31.5%
	Cahill	65.6%
	Other	2.9%

Westchester	Schneiderman	59.0%
	Cahill	39.1%
	Other	1.9%

Wyoming	Schneiderman	26.9%
	Cahill	71.2%
	Other	1.9%

Yates	Schneiderman	35.4%
	Cahill	61.3%
	Other	3.3%

National DataGraph for 2014 - New York Results for 2014

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved