Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Beaver	Weinholtz	13.1%
	Herbert	82.4%
		0.0%
	Other	4.4%

Box Elder	Weinholtz	13.1%
	Herbert	81.9%
		0.0%
	Other	5.1%

Cache	Weinholtz	19.7%
	Herbert	75.4%
		0.0%
	Other	4.9%

Carbon	Weinholtz	25.6%
	Herbert	70.3%
		0.0%
	Other	4.1%

Daggett	Weinholtz	22.0%
	Herbert	74.4%
		0.0%
	Other	3.6%

Davis	Weinholtz	22.2%
	Herbert	73.2%
		0.0%
	Other	4.7%

Duchesne	Weinholtz	10.3%
	Herbert	84.3%
		0.0%
	Other	5.3%

Emery	Weinholtz	11.3%
	Herbert	85.3%
		0.0%
	Other	3.4%

Garfield	Weinholtz	16.2%
	Herbert	80.7%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Grand	Weinholtz	45.5%
	Herbert	49.9%
		0.0%
	Other	4.5%

Iron	Weinholtz	14.9%
	Herbert	78.1%
		0.0%
	Other	7.0%

Juab	Weinholtz	11.8%
	Herbert	84.2%
		0.0%
	Other	4.0%

Kane	Weinholtz	21.0%
	Herbert	74.6%
		0.0%
	Other	4.4%

Millard	Weinholtz	10.2%
	Herbert	85.5%
		0.0%
	Other	4.3%

Morgan	Weinholtz	12.2%
	Herbert	83.2%
		0.0%
	Other	4.6%

Piute	Weinholtz	7.6%
	Herbert	88.1%
		0.0%
	Other	4.3%

Rich	Weinholtz	11.0%
	Herbert	85.1%
		0.0%
	Other	3.9%

Salt Lake	Weinholtz	43.5%
	Herbert	52.4%
		0.0%
	Other	4.0%

San Juan	Weinholtz	36.3%
	Herbert	58.6%
		0.0%
	Other	5.1%

Sanpete	Weinholtz	10.2%
	Herbert	85.5%
		0.0%
	Other	4.4%

Sevier	Weinholtz	10.5%
	Herbert	85.1%
		0.0%
	Other	4.4%

Summit	Weinholtz	49.7%
	Herbert	46.9%
		0.0%
	Other	3.4%

Tooele	Weinholtz	25.0%
	Herbert	69.3%
		0.0%
	Other	5.7%

Uintah	Weinholtz	10.9%
	Herbert	84.1%
		0.0%
	Other	4.9%

Utah	Weinholtz	14.3%
	Herbert	81.2%
		0.0%
	Other	4.6%

Wasatch	Weinholtz	25.8%
	Herbert	70.6%
		0.0%
	Other	3.6%

Washington	Weinholtz	17.3%
	Herbert	77.2%
		0.0%
	Other	5.5%

Wayne	Weinholtz	19.4%
	Herbert	78.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Weber	Weinholtz	29.6%
	Herbert	65.2%
		0.0%
	Other	5.2%

National DataGraph for 2016 - Utah Results for 2016

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved