The Deluge of Absurdity, Ignorance, and Bad Posts

[Paul Kemp]

Go to anncoulter.com, she clears this up.

[Paul Kemp]

I think your signature comparing Romney to a murderer is disrespectful to the victims of the murders in Colorado. 

[Paul Kemp]

Is "First Lady" a constitutional term?

[Paul Kemp]

Winfield's current username is OBAMA=NIXON II. Should we even discuss this?

[Paul Kemp]

So guys where's the evangelical Protestant on either ticket? Because I don't see one. Well folks its a Ron Paul write in.

[Paul Kemp]

wow:

There were some questions if Obama was a covert agent for the CIA after college

Excellent. Simply excellent.

Has J.J. pre-ordered his copy of 2016 yet?

[Paul Kemp]

wow:

There were some questions if Obama was a covert agent for the CIA after college

Excellent. Simply excellent.

Has J.J. pre-ordered his copy of 2016 yet?

He did say it was a positive. I'd take it as a positive.

Doesn't mean it's not completely absurd. I can't say I've ever seen these "questions" raised. Anyone else?

[Paul Kemp]

Did I miss this one?

Admitted drug addict, Barack Obama has used cocaine and marijuana often during his high school and college years.  He told Jay Leno that he loved to inhale marijuana and "that was the point."  He's also tried to quit cigarette smoking during his first term. 

Do you feel comfortable voting for an admitted drug addict? 

Granted, most voters want marijuana legalized, so the stigma of drug addiction is lessened.  GW Bush was often seen at parties with cocaine and his presidency was a resounding success. 

Does drug addiction to marijuana or anything else affect a President's ability to have success? 

Will Obama succumb to the temptation of cigarettes before his 2nd debate performance?

[Paul Kemp]

453-85. No doubt a landslide. Huntsman would have made MASSIVE inroads with Hispanics and the wealthy educated urban classes. It would have been a realigning election. The 2016 map would have looked like this, no joke.

+ 

Huntsman would be like Reagan x2, without any fault or flaw. The 23rd Amendment might be repealed on the grounds of sheer stupidity.

[Paul Kemp]

I think he's joking.

I hope so.

[Paul Kemp]

I think he's joking.

I hope so.

It was worth putting here just in case.....cause I'm not so sure.

I'm not so sure either, especially given this post from the same thread:

This timeline accurately conveys what would have happened under a Huntsman presidency, sub-4% unemployment (aka full employment), trillion dollar surpluses, falling debt, rising power, 3/4+ approval ratings, and people angry unemployment is above the horrid rate of 5%. But Americans aren't that stupid, and wouldn't be so idiotic as to give us the map Maxwell presents us with. It would have been a 51-state sweep. But we were stupid enough to reject our chance at 24-year plus political dominance and mass prosperity.

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=159110.75

[Paul Kemp]

If you guys weren't so new, you'd know I was serious. But Grumps should have known!

I'm not sure who you're talking to but I hope it's not me. I was here when you were pissing your Huggies. If I thought you were joking I would have put it in the Goldmine obviously.

[Paul Kemp]

Classic Naso just throwing stuff out there without any factual basis...

It is most gratifying to see all you Dem hacks and your perpetual fascination, nay, your absolute obsession, with Mitt Romney, following his every move.

Perhaps someday you will find some other object of your affection to stalk, but for the time being you are certainly getting your essential Romney fix.

Clearly, you and the nation cannot get enough of this great man.

Keep up the great work you Romney obsessives you.

I agree. I also love the gloating among Democrats that the country has "embraced" their beliefs. I'll let y'all in on a little secret...of the Obama voters I know...most all of them are adamantly opposed to gay marriages, raising taxes on the wealthy, and one of them talks poorly of African Americans and dependency. Yet every one of those people voted for Obama. Just because they voted for him doesn't believe they have adopted into the "Obama Euphoria" culture at all.

Trust me. I made the same mistake in late 2004/early 2005 thinking "Our side won, it's a mandate" when in reality it was a tiny, weak formed coalition that toppled down in 2006 and 2008. You can't act like: I lost 10 million voters, won only 40% of white Americans, and minorities and have an overwhelming mandate. Dems have to be cautious.

It is most gratifying to see all you Dem hacks and your perpetual fascination, nay, your absolute obsession, with Mitt Romney, following his every move.

Perhaps someday you will find some other object of your affection to stalk, but for the time being you are certainly getting your essential Romney fix.

Clearly, you and the nation cannot get enough of this great man.

Keep up the great work you Romney obsessives you.

I'll let y'all in on a little secret...of the Obama voters I know...most all of them are adamantly opposed to gay marriages, raising taxes on the wealthy, and one of them talks poorly of African Americans and dependency.

people you know =/= 64 million democratic voters.

You're missing my point. Liberals are acting as though pretty much every person who voted for Obama voted for dependency, civil rights, gay rights, ect. In actuality, many Obama voters simply didn't like Mitt Romney, and had their been a better GOP candidate, they'd be President-elect right now.

[Paul Kemp]

I'm confused.

[Paul Kemp]

Posted in a thread about a concession speech in 2016:

What's the context here? Did this really happen or is this a hypothetical?

Yea, I'll take that one. I misread the original post (and for some reason thought they were talking about 2012 instead of 2016) and wasn't thinking. I thought that the post was supposed to be what happened to Romney after his concession speech. I'm an idiot.

[Paul Kemp]

Anyway...

Is there Booker hate too? How could anyone dislike that man? He's a good mayor and an even better person. I hope he can succeed Lautenberg in 2016. I'd vote for him above any Republican, because I deeply admire him and believe this country would benefit from having him on the national stage.

He's a black version of Evan Bayh. Party backstabbers, we can't have 'em. Kick him out!

[Paul Kemp]

Yes, but because she was more centrist than Obama.  Obama far and away is just not a good fit for the region politically--he's WAY too liberal.  Not that Hillary Clinton's not pretty far-left herself, but just not as much as Obama.  So, although she probably wouldn't have done a whole lot better, she would have performed better than he did.

If Hillary had won the nomination, he (and the rest of the right) would be saying that about Obama.

[Paul Kemp]

Hopefully they don't exist.

I don't like the thought of my ghostly relatives being around when I watch porn or masturbate for example.

And if they exist, hopefully they have other stuff to do in the meantime.

There's nothing absurd, ignorant, or bad about that. Should be in the Goldmine.

[Paul Kemp]

Joseph Dioguardi Defeated Kristen Gilibrand in 2010 Special Election and he is Running For President in 2016

GO Jospeh Dioguardi

I PROUD TO BE ALBANIAN!!!

[Paul Kemp]

You accidentally put that here instead of the Goldmine.

I find it sufficiently absurd.

[Paul Kemp]

http://blogs.wsj.com/metropolis/2012/08/23/whos-the-boss-star-tony-danza-weighs-run-for-mayor/

Not sure if this has any legitimacy to it, but if Tony Danza runs I'll probably support him. Or Kelsey Grammar, if he runs.

crossposted.

[Paul Kemp]

http://blogs.wsj.com/metropolis/2012/08/23/whos-the-boss-star-tony-danza-weighs-run-for-mayor/

Not sure if this has any legitimacy to it, but if Tony Danza runs I'll probably support him. Or Kelsey Grammar, if he runs.

crossposted.

How is it ignorant in anyway? I know for the most part that many of the candidates in NYC would be too liberal for me. So why wouldn't I want a conservative like Grammar to run? or even Danza who's ideology I don't know?

It's not ignorant, just absurd.

[Paul Kemp]

Keeping in mind the possibility that the next Veep may not have been elected to office yet (see Richard Nixon, Spiro Agnew and Sarah Palin), or may not have risen to prominence yet (see Paul Ryan).

Hillary's qualifications are impressive enough that she doesn't need to make up for any shortcomings. And she can have her pick of middle-aged to old white guys. I don't think she'd choose a woman, or anyone from New York/ Arkansas.

The long list would include...
Mark Warner- Because of his combination of business/ executive and legislative experience, as well as his help in a crucial swing state.
Tim Kaine- Same reason. He's also slightly younger than Warner.
Charlie Crist- May help in Florida. Will allow Clinton to depict the Republicans as a group of crazy radicals.
Julian Castro- Can excite Latinos and younger voters. Executive of a city with a population greater than New Hampshire.
John Hickenlooper- Swing state Governor.
Martin O'Malley- Does no harm. Currently under Fifty.
Brian Schweitzer- Politically talented.
Jon Tester- Survived two close elections. Appeal to rural white voters.
Gavin Newsom- The most prominent white guy under fifty (in 2016) the Democrats seem to have. Possible Governor of California.

So why are you excluding Gov. Deval Patrick?  

Frodo's obsession with black people is getting downright weird. Just because he happens to be an incumbent officeholder does not qualify him or anything.

Patrick has been mentioned as a 2016 candidate. Even if he wasn't, there wouldn't be any thing absurd, ignorant, or bad about the post.

You, once again, fail.

[Paul Kemp]

The response to this is more proof that critical thinking is dead.

[Paul Kemp]

Either way, we must continue to let this live and not succumb to the imposter thread.