MA: Re-Establishment of a Lieutenant Governor Amendment (Debating)

[tmthforu94]

Could we get a vote on TexasDem's amendment? I'm not quite sure where everyone stands on this, to be honest.

[Gass3268]

Could we get a vote on TexasDem's amendment? I'm not quite sure where everyone stands on this, to be honest.

I agree, let's vote on the amendment and then see what changes we'd want to make afterwards.

[Talleyrand]

Yeah, if Inks' bill passes next week, I'll make some changes to my amendment (hopefully friendly to reflect that).

[Queen Mum Inks.LWC]

No, we can't hold a vote yet.  You need to fix your language for the Senate appointment.

[Talleyrand]

I've removed the reference to the Superior Court in my amendment. Is there anything else I need to fix before we can have a vote?

[Queen Mum Inks.LWC]

I've removed the reference to the Superior Court in my amendment. Is there anything else I need to fix before we can have a vote?

Where's your new text?

[tmthforu94]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[Queen Mum Inks.LWC]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Is that the whole amendment to the amendment?

[tmthforu94]

That's the amended section that was messed up before, preventing a vote on it.

[Queen Mum Inks.LWC]

That's the amended section that was messed up before, preventing a vote on it.

OK - as soon as TexasDem confirms that that's how he wants everything worded, we'll vote on it.

[tmthforu94]

Considering that he wanted a vote on it before, then fixed the concern you brought up, and asked if anyone else saw something before proceeding to a vote, I'd say this is the version he wants voted on, as it's clear he doesn't have anything to change unless someone else see's a mistake (which I don't).

[Queen Mum Inks.LWC]

Well, I'd rather wait and ensure that that is in fact the language he wants for that section.

[Talleyrand]

Yes, that's the correct language.

[Queen Mum Inks.LWC]

The following is now brought to a vote.  Members will vote AYE, NAY or ABSTAIN.  This will be a 24-hour vote.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Article I, Section 3 of the Mideast Constitution is hereby amended to read:

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Article I, Section 4 of the Mideast Constitution is hereby amended to read:

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Article II, Section 2 of the Mideast Constitution is hereby amended to read:

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Article III, Section 1 of the Mideast Constitution is hereby amended to read:

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Article III, Section 2 of the Mideast Constitution is hereby amended to read:

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Article III, Section 6 of the Mideast Constituition is hereby amended to read:

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Article IV, Section 1 of the Mideast Constitution is hereby amended to read:

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Article VI, Section 1 of the Mideast Constitution is hereby amended to read:

You must be logged in to read this quote.

All clauses of the Mideast Constitution (i.e. Part 1 of Article III, Section 5) not modified by this Act shall remain intact. [/quote]

[Queen Mum Inks.LWC]

AYE

[Kitteh]

AYE

[Talleyrand]

AYE

[FEMA Camp Administrator]

Aye.

[Gass3268]

AYE

[Queen Mum Inks.LWC]

Voting is now closed.  The AYEs are 5, and the NAYs are 0.  The AYEs have it, and the amendment is adopted.

[Queen Mum Inks.LWC]

I propose the following amendment:

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[/quote]

[Talleyrand]

I suppose this is okay... unless anyone's interested in changing to a 4 or 6 member Assembly, which doesn't seem to a particularly good idea.

[FEMA Camp Administrator]

Makes sense, given the seats in the Assembly.

[Kitteh]

I agree with TexasDem and Cathcon.

[Queen Mum Inks.LWC]

I suppose this is okay... unless anyone's interested in changing to a 4 or 6 member Assembly, which doesn't seem to a particularly good idea.

Especially not since we JUST changed the Assembly size provision.