NBC/WSJ GOP and Dem poll for IA and NH

[Senator Cris]

[Senator Cris]

Full IOWA #s:

GOP:

Trump 24 (- 4)
Carson 19 (- 3)
Fiorina 8 (+3)
Bush 7 (+1)
Cruz 6 (+2)
Rubio 6 (+2)
Jindal 6 (+2)
Huckabee 5 (+2)
Paul 4 (- 1)
Christie 4 (+2)
Kasich 3 (+ 1)
Santorum 1 (=)
Graham 1 (+1)
Pataki, Gilmore <1 (=)

DEM:

Clinton 33 (- 5)
Sanders 28 (+1)
Biden 22 (+2)
O'Malley 3 (- 1)
Webb 1 (- 1)
Chafee <1 (- 1)

Clinton 47 (- 1)
Sanders 36 (- 1)
O'Malley 4 (=)
Webb 1 (- 1)
Chafee <1 (- 1)

[Senator Cris]

Full NH #s:

GOP:

Trump 21 (- 7)
Fiorina 16 (+10)
Bush 11 (+3)
Rubio 10 (+7)
Carson 10 (- 1)
Christie 7 (+2)
Kasich 6 (- 6)
Cruz 6 (+1)
Paul 5 (=)
Huckabee 1 (- 1)
All others <1 (Graham and Jindal - 1)

DEM:

Sanders 42 (+1)
Clinton 28 (- 4)
Biden 18 (+2)
O'Malley 2 (+1)
Webb 1 (=)
Chafee 1 (+1)

Sanders 48 (- 1)
Clinton 39 (+1)
Chafee 2 (+1)
O'Malley 2 (+1)
Webb 1 (- 1)

[Senator Cris]

Note that Jindal's been airing TV ads in Iowa, while Christie airs ads in NH:

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=218607.msg4743145#msg4743145

Bush's Super PAC has been airing ads in all the early states.

Kasich's been running ads in NH, but I think that was more in August than September.  His ad spending has slowed down, and he's got more competition on the airwaves now.

Trump has aired no TV ads yet.  Carson and Fiorina have spent very little on TV ads in the early states.

About Christie: is true that he is airing ads in NH, but he's up 2 points in Iowa, where he's not airing ads, so I think that there is a bit of momentum behind his growth, regardless of the ads.