Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Adair	Carson	54.0%
	Coburn	42.2%
	Other	3.8%

Alfalfa	Carson	32.5%
	Coburn	58.0%
	Other	9.5%

Atoka	Carson	49.5%
	Coburn	45.1%
	Other	5.4%

Beaver	Carson	22.9%
	Coburn	72.7%
	Other	4.4%

Beckham	Carson	42.7%
	Coburn	49.7%
	Other	7.6%

Blaine	Carson	38.7%
	Coburn	51.0%
	Other	10.2%

Bryan	Carson	51.4%
	Coburn	42.8%
	Other	5.8%

Caddo	Carson	50.2%
	Coburn	41.0%
	Other	8.8%

Canadian	Carson	27.7%
	Coburn	64.8%
	Other	7.5%

Carter	Carson	43.3%
	Coburn	47.3%
	Other	9.4%

Cherokee	Carson	57.3%
	Coburn	39.3%
	Other	3.4%

Choctaw	Carson	60.0%
	Coburn	35.7%
	Other	4.3%

Cimarron	Carson	26.9%
	Coburn	68.7%
	Other	4.4%

Cleveland	Carson	36.8%
	Coburn	55.3%
	Other	7.8%

Coal	Carson	57.8%
	Coburn	36.7%
	Other	5.5%

Comanche	Carson	45.3%
	Coburn	47.2%
	Other	7.5%

Cotton	Carson	50.4%
	Coburn	41.9%
	Other	7.7%

Craig	Carson	52.5%
	Coburn	43.7%
	Other	3.8%

Creek	Carson	42.2%
	Coburn	53.2%
	Other	4.6%

Custer	Carson	36.1%
	Coburn	55.8%
	Other	8.1%

Delaware	Carson	49.0%
	Coburn	47.3%
	Other	3.6%

Dewey	Carson	36.3%
	Coburn	54.5%
	Other	9.2%

Ellis	Carson	32.9%
	Coburn	57.1%
	Other	10.0%

Garfield	Carson	30.9%
	Coburn	58.5%
	Other	10.6%

Garvin	Carson	41.9%
	Coburn	48.5%
	Other	9.6%

Grady	Carson	35.8%
	Coburn	54.5%
	Other	9.7%

Grant	Carson	36.9%
	Coburn	51.6%
	Other	11.6%

Greer	Carson	48.1%
	Coburn	46.0%
	Other	6.0%

Harmon	Carson	50.4%
	Coburn	42.5%
	Other	7.1%

Harper	Carson	32.3%
	Coburn	58.7%
	Other	9.0%

Haskell	Carson	57.5%
	Coburn	40.0%
	Other	2.5%

Hughes	Carson	53.1%
	Coburn	40.3%
	Other	6.6%

Jackson	Carson	38.1%
	Coburn	54.9%
	Other	7.0%

Jefferson	Carson	53.3%
	Coburn	39.1%
	Other	7.6%

Johnston	Carson	55.7%
	Coburn	37.8%
	Other	6.5%

Kay	Carson	35.9%
	Coburn	56.0%
	Other	8.1%

Kingfisher	Carson	23.9%
	Coburn	67.1%
	Other	9.0%

Kiowa	Carson	52.1%
	Coburn	40.1%
	Other	7.8%

Latimer	Carson	56.3%
	Coburn	39.1%
	Other	4.6%

Le Flore	Carson	51.4%
	Coburn	45.3%
	Other	3.3%

Lincoln	Carson	35.8%
	Coburn	54.7%
	Other	9.5%

Logan	Carson	34.0%
	Coburn	58.4%
	Other	7.6%

Love	Carson	50.5%
	Coburn	40.4%
	Other	9.1%

McClain	Carson	33.5%
	Coburn	57.7%
	Other	8.8%

McCurtain	Carson	47.6%
	Coburn	49.2%
	Other	3.3%

McIntosh	Carson	57.5%
	Coburn	40.3%
	Other	2.2%

Major	Carson	26.6%
	Coburn	64.6%
	Other	8.8%

Marshall	Carson	47.7%
	Coburn	44.2%
	Other	8.1%

Mayes	Carson	53.0%
	Coburn	43.7%
	Other	3.3%

Murray	Carson	49.0%
	Coburn	41.8%
	Other	9.2%

Muskogee	Carson	50.3%
	Coburn	47.3%
	Other	2.4%

Noble	Carson	32.3%
	Coburn	56.2%
	Other	11.5%

Nowata	Carson	48.8%
	Coburn	47.0%
	Other	4.2%

Okfuskee	Carson	51.7%
	Coburn	43.8%
	Other	4.5%

Oklahoma	Carson	38.1%
	Coburn	55.1%
	Other	6.8%

Okmulgee	Carson	56.1%
	Coburn	40.7%
	Other	3.2%

Osage	Carson	50.1%
	Coburn	45.2%
	Other	4.7%

Ottawa	Carson	54.4%
	Coburn	42.3%
	Other	3.3%

Pawnee	Carson	45.0%
	Coburn	49.4%
	Other	5.6%

Payne	Carson	38.2%
	Coburn	54.6%
	Other	7.1%

Pittsburg	Carson	53.2%
	Coburn	41.6%
	Other	5.2%

Pontotoc	Carson	44.6%
	Coburn	48.2%
	Other	7.2%

Pottawatomie	Carson	39.0%
	Coburn	52.1%
	Other	8.9%

Pushmataha	Carson	57.0%
	Coburn	37.6%
	Other	5.4%

Roger Mills	Carson	33.9%
	Coburn	58.8%
	Other	7.3%

Rogers	Carson	42.9%
	Coburn	53.6%
	Other	3.5%

Seminole	Carson	47.0%
	Coburn	45.1%
	Other	8.0%

Sequoyah	Carson	52.8%
	Coburn	44.4%
	Other	2.8%

Stephens	Carson	37.7%
	Coburn	53.6%
	Other	8.7%

Texas	Carson	24.4%
	Coburn	71.9%
	Other	3.6%

Tillman	Carson	55.6%
	Coburn	38.2%
	Other	6.1%

Tulsa	Carson	40.3%
	Coburn	56.2%
	Other	3.5%

Wagoner	Carson	39.8%
	Coburn	56.9%
	Other	3.3%

Washington	Carson	35.6%
	Coburn	60.1%
	Other	4.3%

Washita	Carson	41.5%
	Coburn	49.7%
	Other	8.8%

Woods	Carson	34.0%
	Coburn	54.8%
	Other	11.3%

Woodward	Carson	29.4%
	Coburn	60.6%
	Other	10.0%

National DataGraph for 2004 - Oklahoma Results for 2004

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved