Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2016-02-18

Map

Map

Accomack	Spong	53.9%
	Scott	44.0%
	Other	2.1%

Albemarle	Spong	51.5%
	Scott	47.1%
	Other	1.4%

Alleghany	Spong	44.4%
	Scott	52.5%
	Other	3.1%

Amelia	Spong	37.7%
	Scott	60.9%
	Other	1.4%

Amherst	Spong	38.5%
	Scott	60.0%
	Other	1.5%

Appomattox	Spong	30.7%
	Scott	67.1%
	Other	2.2%

Arlington	Spong	52.8%
	Scott	42.8%
	Other	4.4%

Augusta	Spong	28.6%
	Scott	67.7%
	Other	3.7%

Bath	Spong	45.5%
	Scott	51.4%
	Other	3.1%

Bedford	Spong	36.9%
	Scott	60.7%
	Other	2.4%

Bland	Spong	42.0%
	Scott	56.6%
	Other	1.3%

Botetourt	Spong	44.8%
	Scott	51.4%
	Other	3.8%

Brunswick	Spong	45.4%
	Scott	53.4%
	Other	1.2%

Buchanan	Spong	50.6%
	Scott	46.9%
	Other	2.5%

Buckingham	Spong	43.1%
	Scott	55.4%
	Other	1.6%

Campbell	Spong	25.5%
	Scott	70.0%
	Other	4.4%

Caroline	Spong	46.1%
	Scott	52.8%
	Other	1.2%

Carroll	Spong	32.0%
	Scott	66.6%
	Other	1.4%

Charles City	Spong	58.1%
	Scott	38.6%
	Other	3.3%

Charlotte	Spong	41.5%
	Scott	57.1%
	Other	1.5%

Chesterfield	Spong	28.2%
	Scott	70.2%
	Other	1.6%

Clarke	Spong	46.7%
	Scott	51.4%
	Other	1.8%

Craig	Spong	48.9%
	Scott	49.6%
	Other	1.5%

Culpeper	Spong	42.4%
	Scott	55.8%
	Other	1.8%

Cumberland	Spong	45.8%
	Scott	52.9%
	Other	1.3%

Dickenson	Spong	48.3%
	Scott	51.0%
	Other	0.7%

Dinwiddie	Spong	44.0%
	Scott	54.3%
	Other	1.7%

Essex	Spong	42.6%
	Scott	56.4%
	Other	1.0%

Fairfax	Spong	48.5%
	Scott	48.2%
	Other	3.3%

Fauquier	Spong	39.9%
	Scott	55.9%
	Other	4.1%

Floyd	Spong	33.2%
	Scott	64.8%
	Other	2.1%

Fluvanna	Spong	42.5%
	Scott	56.2%
	Other	1.4%

Franklin	Spong	47.3%
	Scott	50.9%
	Other	1.8%

Frederick	Spong	42.1%
	Scott	56.1%
	Other	1.9%

Giles	Spong	49.8%
	Scott	48.3%
	Other	1.9%

Gloucester	Spong	43.7%
	Scott	54.2%
	Other	2.1%

Goochland	Spong	47.2%
	Scott	51.5%
	Other	1.2%

Grayson	Spong	41.4%
	Scott	57.8%
	Other	0.8%

Greene	Spong	29.0%
	Scott	69.7%
	Other	1.3%

Greensville	Spong	53.2%
	Scott	45.8%
	Other	1.1%

Halifax	Spong	39.5%
	Scott	59.6%
	Other	0.9%

Hanover	Spong	26.3%
	Scott	72.5%
	Other	1.3%

Henrico	Spong	33.3%
	Scott	64.8%
	Other	2.0%

Henry	Spong	44.4%
	Scott	52.1%
	Other	3.5%

Highland	Spong	30.8%
	Scott	67.5%
	Other	1.7%

Isle of Wight	Spong	56.3%
	Scott	42.1%
	Other	1.6%

James City	Spong	50.2%
	Scott	45.9%
	Other	3.8%

King and Queen	Spong	37.8%
	Scott	60.2%
	Other	2.0%

King George	Spong	43.5%
	Scott	54.9%
	Other	1.6%

King William	Spong	36.0%
	Scott	62.7%
	Other	1.3%

Lancaster	Spong	36.3%
	Scott	62.5%
	Other	1.1%

Lee	Spong	44.9%
	Scott	53.7%
	Other	1.4%

Loudoun	Spong	45.4%
	Scott	52.7%
	Other	1.9%

Louisa	Spong	36.9%
	Scott	61.5%
	Other	1.6%

Lunenburg	Spong	37.8%
	Scott	60.5%
	Other	1.7%

Madison	Spong	35.4%
	Scott	62.7%
	Other	1.9%

Mathews	Spong	41.5%
	Scott	57.4%
	Other	1.2%

Mecklenburg	Spong	39.8%
	Scott	58.9%
	Other	1.3%

Middlesex	Spong	41.6%
	Scott	57.1%
	Other	1.3%

Montgomery	Spong	44.4%
	Scott	53.4%
	Other	2.2%

Nansemond	Spong	58.7%
	Scott	39.6%
	Other	1.7%

Nelson	Spong	51.3%
	Scott	46.3%
	Other	2.5%

New Kent	Spong	34.6%
	Scott	63.7%
	Other	1.7%

Northampton	Spong	51.9%
	Scott	45.5%
	Other	2.6%

Northumberland	Spong	35.4%
	Scott	63.7%
	Other	0.9%

Nottoway	Spong	44.2%
	Scott	54.7%
	Other	1.1%

Orange	Spong	42.0%
	Scott	54.3%
	Other	3.7%

Page	Spong	35.9%
	Scott	63.1%
	Other	1.0%

Patrick	Spong	39.8%
	Scott	57.5%
	Other	2.7%

Pittsylvania	Spong	35.2%
	Scott	63.7%
	Other	1.1%

Powhatan	Spong	38.3%
	Scott	60.2%
	Other	1.5%

Prince Edward	Spong	46.3%
	Scott	52.4%
	Other	1.3%

Prince George	Spong	41.0%
	Scott	57.2%
	Other	1.8%

Prince William	Spong	37.5%
	Scott	58.6%
	Other	3.9%

Pulaski	Spong	43.1%
	Scott	55.9%
	Other	1.1%

Rappahannock	Spong	43.1%
	Scott	54.8%
	Other	2.1%

Richmond	Spong	34.7%
	Scott	64.6%
	Other	0.8%

Roanoke	Spong	41.8%
	Scott	56.2%
	Other	1.9%

Rockbridge	Spong	41.9%
	Scott	55.5%
	Other	2.5%

Rockingham	Spong	27.6%
	Scott	70.3%
	Other	2.1%

Russell	Spong	48.8%
	Scott	49.9%
	Other	1.3%

Scott	Spong	38.6%
	Scott	59.2%
	Other	2.2%

Shenandoah	Spong	29.6%
	Scott	69.3%
	Other	1.0%

Smyth	Spong	41.9%
	Scott	55.0%
	Other	3.1%

Southampton	Spong	54.8%
	Scott	43.6%
	Other	1.5%

Spotsylvania	Spong	42.2%
	Scott	55.8%
	Other	2.0%

Stafford	Spong	36.6%
	Scott	61.3%
	Other	2.1%

Surry	Spong	63.1%
	Scott	35.4%
	Other	1.5%

Sussex	Spong	55.7%
	Scott	42.2%
	Other	2.1%

Tazewell	Spong	45.4%
	Scott	49.4%
	Other	5.3%

Warren	Spong	45.5%
	Scott	51.1%
	Other	3.3%

Washington	Spong	38.8%
	Scott	57.7%
	Other	3.5%

Westmoreland	Spong	39.1%
	Scott	58.4%
	Other	2.6%

Wise	Spong	52.2%
	Scott	47.1%
	Other	0.6%

Wythe	Spong	39.7%
	Scott	58.2%
	Other	2.1%

York	Spong	42.5%
	Scott	55.4%
	Other	2.0%

City

Alexandria	Spong	54.1%
	Scott	42.1%
	Other	3.8%

Bedford	Spong	46.8%
	Scott	50.9%
	Other	2.3%

Bristol	Spong	49.5%
	Scott	49.2%
	Other	1.3%

Buena Vista	Spong	53.7%
	Scott	43.1%
	Other	3.2%

Charlottesville	Spong	56.4%
	Scott	41.1%
	Other	2.4%

Chesapeake	Spong	51.5%
	Scott	45.2%
	Other	3.2%

Clifton Forge	Spong	50.3%
	Scott	46.0%
	Other	3.7%

Colonial Heights	Spong	26.0%
	Scott	71.4%
	Other	2.6%

Covington	Spong	46.1%
	Scott	50.2%
	Other	3.7%

Danville	Spong	31.5%
	Scott	66.5%
	Other	2.0%

Emporia	Spong	43.7%
	Scott	55.4%
	Other	0.8%

Fairfax	Spong	46.4%
	Scott	50.4%
	Other	3.2%

Falls Church	Spong	53.7%
	Scott	43.7%
	Other	2.6%

Franklin	Spong	55.3%
	Scott	43.5%
	Other	1.2%

Fredericksburg	Spong	46.8%
	Scott	51.9%
	Other	1.3%

Galax	Spong	47.0%
	Scott	52.2%
	Other	0.9%

Hampton	Spong	52.2%
	Scott	44.6%
	Other	3.2%

Harrisonburg	Spong	43.8%
	Scott	52.8%
	Other	3.3%

Hopewell	Spong	36.5%
	Scott	59.7%
	Other	3.8%

Lexington	Spong	56.8%
	Scott	41.5%
	Other	1.8%

Lynchburg	Spong	35.1%
	Scott	62.2%
	Other	2.7%

Manassas	Spong	0.0%
	Scott	0.0%

Manassas Park	Spong	0.0%
	Scott	0.0%

Martinsville	Spong	47.6%
	Scott	50.4%
	Other	2.0%

Newport News	Spong	49.9%
	Scott	48.4%
	Other	1.7%

Norfolk	Spong	62.2%
	Scott	35.7%
	Other	2.2%

Norton	Spong	56.3%
	Scott	41.4%
	Other	2.3%

Petersburg	Spong	54.2%
	Scott	44.2%
	Other	1.6%

Poquoson	Spong	0.0%
	Scott	0.0%

Portsmouth	Spong	66.6%
	Scott	32.2%
	Other	1.1%

Radford	Spong	45.3%
	Scott	53.2%
	Other	1.5%

Richmond	Spong	55.8%
	Scott	42.6%
	Other	1.6%

Roanoke	Spong	52.4%
	Scott	45.8%
	Other	1.8%

Salem	Spong	42.3%
	Scott	55.3%
	Other	2.4%

South Boston	Spong	35.3%
	Scott	63.2%
	Other	1.4%

Staunton	Spong	32.1%
	Scott	64.8%
	Other	3.0%

Suffolk	Spong	49.8%
	Scott	48.9%
	Other	1.3%

Virginia Beach	Spong	46.7%
	Scott	49.9%
	Other	3.3%

Waynesboro	Spong	39.1%
	Scott	58.0%
	Other	2.9%

Williamsburg	Spong	58.5%
	Scott	37.6%
	Other	3.9%

Winchester	Spong	43.5%
	Scott	55.1%
	Other	1.4%

National DataGraph for 1972 - Virginia Results for 1972

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved