Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Adair	Hubbell	33.9%
	Reynolds	64.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Adams	Hubbell	31.4%
	Reynolds	66.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Allamakee	Hubbell	38.1%
	Reynolds	58.6%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Appanoose	Hubbell	36.3%
	Reynolds	61.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Audubon	Hubbell	36.7%
	Reynolds	61.5%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Benton	Hubbell	38.5%
	Reynolds	58.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Black Hawk	Hubbell	54.9%
	Reynolds	42.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Boone	Hubbell	47.6%
	Reynolds	50.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Bremer	Hubbell	43.7%
	Reynolds	54.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Buchanan	Hubbell	45.5%
	Reynolds	51.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Buena Vista	Hubbell	40.4%
	Reynolds	57.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Butler	Hubbell	33.5%
	Reynolds	64.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Calhoun	Hubbell	34.0%
	Reynolds	62.9%
		0.0%
	Other	3.2%

Carroll	Hubbell	35.3%
	Reynolds	62.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Cass	Hubbell	32.4%
	Reynolds	65.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Cedar	Hubbell	43.3%
	Reynolds	54.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Cerro Gordo	Hubbell	47.3%
	Reynolds	50.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Cherokee	Hubbell	33.3%
	Reynolds	64.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Chickasaw	Hubbell	40.1%
	Reynolds	57.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Clarke	Hubbell	34.5%
	Reynolds	63.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Clay	Hubbell	35.0%
	Reynolds	63.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Clayton	Hubbell	37.6%
	Reynolds	57.0%
		0.0%
	Other	5.5%

Clinton	Hubbell	49.6%
	Reynolds	48.5%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Crawford	Hubbell	32.0%
	Reynolds	66.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Dallas	Hubbell	47.4%
	Reynolds	50.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Davis	Hubbell	31.9%
	Reynolds	65.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Decatur	Hubbell	34.1%
	Reynolds	63.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Delaware	Hubbell	34.8%
	Reynolds	62.3%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Des Moines	Hubbell	53.0%
	Reynolds	45.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Dickinson	Hubbell	35.4%
	Reynolds	62.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Dubuque	Hubbell	49.4%
	Reynolds	48.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Emmet	Hubbell	36.7%
	Reynolds	61.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Fayette	Hubbell	41.9%
	Reynolds	55.0%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Floyd	Hubbell	44.5%
	Reynolds	53.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Franklin	Hubbell	33.6%
	Reynolds	64.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Fremont	Hubbell	32.9%
	Reynolds	64.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Greene	Hubbell	40.9%
	Reynolds	56.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Grundy	Hubbell	32.5%
	Reynolds	65.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Guthrie	Hubbell	34.5%
	Reynolds	62.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Hamilton	Hubbell	40.1%
	Reynolds	58.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Hancock	Hubbell	30.4%
	Reynolds	67.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Hardin	Hubbell	37.1%
	Reynolds	60.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Harrison	Hubbell	31.9%
	Reynolds	65.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Henry	Hubbell	40.2%
	Reynolds	57.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Howard	Hubbell	39.3%
	Reynolds	56.6%
		0.0%
	Other	4.1%

Humboldt	Hubbell	29.4%
	Reynolds	68.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Ida	Hubbell	24.2%
	Reynolds	74.5%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Iowa	Hubbell	38.8%
	Reynolds	58.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Jackson	Hubbell	41.7%
	Reynolds	55.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Jasper	Hubbell	45.4%
	Reynolds	52.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Jefferson	Hubbell	53.0%
	Reynolds	44.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Johnson	Hubbell	71.6%
	Reynolds	26.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Jones	Hubbell	42.4%
	Reynolds	55.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Keokuk	Hubbell	31.7%
	Reynolds	66.5%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Kossuth	Hubbell	35.1%
	Reynolds	63.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Lee	Hubbell	50.5%
	Reynolds	47.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Linn	Hubbell	55.6%
	Reynolds	41.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Louisa	Hubbell	38.4%
	Reynolds	59.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Lucas	Hubbell	32.7%
	Reynolds	65.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Lyon	Hubbell	16.4%
	Reynolds	82.5%
		0.0%
	Other	1.0%

Madison	Hubbell	35.8%
	Reynolds	62.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Mahaska	Hubbell	28.0%
	Reynolds	69.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Marion	Hubbell	34.9%
	Reynolds	63.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Marshall	Hubbell	48.4%
	Reynolds	49.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Mills	Hubbell	34.6%
	Reynolds	62.4%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Mitchell	Hubbell	37.6%
	Reynolds	59.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Monona	Hubbell	30.8%
	Reynolds	67.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Monroe	Hubbell	33.6%
	Reynolds	64.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Montgomery	Hubbell	30.8%
	Reynolds	66.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Muscatine	Hubbell	47.3%
	Reynolds	50.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

O'Brien	Hubbell	22.2%
	Reynolds	76.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Osceola	Hubbell	19.8%
	Reynolds	79.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Page	Hubbell	32.6%
	Reynolds	65.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Palo Alto	Hubbell	36.9%
	Reynolds	61.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Plymouth	Hubbell	25.1%
	Reynolds	73.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Pocahontas	Hubbell	30.8%
	Reynolds	66.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Polk	Hubbell	58.1%
	Reynolds	39.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Pottawattamie	Hubbell	41.7%
	Reynolds	55.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Poweshiek	Hubbell	48.1%
	Reynolds	50.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Ringgold	Hubbell	34.7%
	Reynolds	63.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Sac	Hubbell	29.1%
	Reynolds	68.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Scott	Hubbell	50.8%
	Reynolds	47.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Shelby	Hubbell	28.6%
	Reynolds	69.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Sioux	Hubbell	13.1%
	Reynolds	85.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.0%

Story	Hubbell	58.7%
	Reynolds	38.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Tama	Hubbell	44.2%
	Reynolds	53.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Taylor	Hubbell	31.0%
	Reynolds	66.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Union	Hubbell	37.5%
	Reynolds	60.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Van Buren	Hubbell	28.7%
	Reynolds	69.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Wapello	Hubbell	45.4%
	Reynolds	52.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Warren	Hubbell	45.1%
	Reynolds	52.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Washington	Hubbell	40.9%
	Reynolds	56.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Wayne	Hubbell	30.0%
	Reynolds	67.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Webster	Hubbell	43.3%
	Reynolds	54.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Winnebago	Hubbell	38.6%
	Reynolds	58.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Winneshiek	Hubbell	48.5%
	Reynolds	49.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Woodbury	Hubbell	42.4%
	Reynolds	55.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Worth	Hubbell	39.1%
	Reynolds	57.8%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Wright	Hubbell	36.1%
	Reynolds	61.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

National DataGraph for 2018 - Iowa Results for 2018

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved