2020 Lt. Gubernatorial Democratic Primary Election Data Graphs - North Carolina
Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.
Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2020-09-19

Map

AlamanceHolley29.0%
 
Van Duyn25.6%
 
Beasley14.4%
 
Other30.9%
 


AlexanderHolley20.2%
 
Van Duyn14.6%
 
Beasley28.6%
 
Other36.6%
 


AlleghanyHolley17.4%
 
Van Duyn30.9%
 
Beasley12.6%
 
Other39.1%
 


AnsonHolley12.9%
 
Van Duyn48.8%
 
Beasley9.5%
 
Other28.8%
 


AsheHolley26.6%
 
Van Duyn17.4%
 
Beasley16.2%
 
Other39.8%
 


AveryHolley35.9%
 
Van Duyn21.2%
 
Beasley11.2%
 
Other31.7%
 


BeaufortHolley15.2%
 
Van Duyn11.9%
 
Beasley4.8%
 
Other68.1%
 


BertieHolley19.5%
 
Van Duyn4.0%
 
Beasley7.2%
 
Other69.3%
 


BladenHolley15.9%
 
Van Duyn10.8%
 
Beasley6.0%
 
Other67.2%
 


BrunswickHolley30.2%
 
Van Duyn34.5%
 
Beasley10.9%
 
Other24.4%
 


BuncombeHolley16.8%
 
Van Duyn64.6%
 
Beasley6.3%
 
Other12.3%
 


BurkeHolley25.8%
 
Van Duyn21.8%
 
Beasley12.9%
 
Other39.5%
 


CabarrusHolley37.7%
 
Van Duyn11.7%
 
Beasley18.9%
 
Other31.7%
 


CaldwellHolley31.3%
 
Van Duyn15.8%
 
Beasley15.3%
 
Other37.6%
 


CamdenHolley23.6%
 
Van Duyn12.2%
 
Beasley7.0%
 
Other57.2%
 


CarteretHolley21.9%
 
Van Duyn15.1%
 
Beasley9.1%
 
Other53.9%
 


CaswellHolley25.9%
 
Van Duyn24.8%
 
Beasley10.6%
 
Other38.6%
 


CatawbaHolley29.5%
 
Van Duyn10.3%
 
Beasley29.2%
 
Other31.0%
 


ChathamHolley22.8%
 
Van Duyn30.4%
 
Beasley23.4%
 
Other23.5%
 


CherokeeHolley27.2%
 
Van Duyn25.7%
 
Beasley9.7%
 
Other37.4%
 


ChowanHolley22.0%
 
Van Duyn20.5%
 
Beasley6.7%
 
Other50.8%
 


ClayHolley26.2%
 
Van Duyn41.6%
 
Beasley7.7%
 
Other24.5%
 


ClevelandHolley28.6%
 
Van Duyn12.8%
 
Beasley15.9%
 
Other42.8%
 


ColumbusHolley27.2%
 
Van Duyn21.3%
 
Beasley13.2%
 
Other38.4%
 


CravenHolley17.5%
 
Van Duyn10.8%
 
Beasley6.5%
 
Other65.2%
 


CumberlandHolley30.2%
 
Van Duyn14.4%
 
Beasley14.0%
 
Other41.3%
 


CurrituckHolley32.4%
 
Van Duyn12.5%
 
Beasley12.2%
 
Other42.9%
 


DareHolley27.6%
 
Van Duyn22.3%
 
Beasley12.1%
 
Other38.0%
 


DavidsonHolley25.8%
 
Van Duyn24.1%
 
Beasley11.6%
 
Other38.6%
 


DavieHolley25.1%
 
Van Duyn26.7%
 
Beasley9.9%
 
Other38.4%
 


DuplinHolley19.5%
 
Van Duyn9.9%
 
Beasley7.8%
 
Other62.8%
 


DurhamHolley14.3%
 
Van Duyn11.7%
 
Beasley40.6%
 
Other33.4%
 


EdgecombeHolley20.6%
 
Van Duyn11.3%
 
Beasley6.7%
 
Other61.4%
 


ForsythHolley31.0%
 
Van Duyn17.7%
 
Beasley13.6%
 
Other37.8%
 


FranklinHolley43.1%
 
Van Duyn17.4%
 
Beasley7.8%
 
Other31.7%
 


GastonHolley34.0%
 
Van Duyn9.8%
 
Beasley13.6%
 
Other42.5%
 


GatesHolley44.7%
 
Van Duyn8.2%
 
Beasley7.1%
 
Other40.1%
 


GrahamHolley29.2%
 
Van Duyn19.0%
 
Beasley14.5%
 
Other37.3%
 


GranvilleHolley27.6%
 
Van Duyn19.3%
 
Beasley10.6%
 
Other42.5%
 


GreeneHolley9.3%
 
Van Duyn6.0%
 
Beasley4.1%
 
Other80.6%
 


GuilfordHolley30.8%
 
Van Duyn19.3%
 
Beasley26.2%
 
Other23.7%
 


HalifaxHolley15.6%
 
Van Duyn12.5%
 
Beasley7.6%
 
Other64.2%
 


HarnettHolley29.2%
 
Van Duyn19.8%
 
Beasley10.0%
 
Other41.0%
 


HaywoodHolley23.4%
 
Van Duyn37.2%
 
Beasley9.6%
 
Other29.8%
 


HendersonHolley29.0%
 
Van Duyn35.8%
 
Beasley11.1%
 
Other24.1%
 


HertfordHolley20.7%
 
Van Duyn6.6%
 
Beasley9.1%
 
Other63.6%
 


HokeHolley12.9%
 
Van Duyn6.3%
 
Beasley4.7%
 
Other76.1%
 


HydeHolley11.8%
 
Van Duyn10.7%
 
Beasley9.6%
 
Other67.9%
 


IredellHolley32.5%
 
Van Duyn15.0%
 
Beasley16.9%
 
Other35.6%
 


JacksonHolley26.7%
 
Van Duyn31.3%
 
Beasley10.2%
 
Other31.8%
 


JohnstonHolley29.7%
 
Van Duyn23.3%
 
Beasley10.8%
 
Other36.2%
 


JonesHolley16.8%
 
Van Duyn5.1%
 
Beasley5.9%
 
Other72.3%
 


LeeHolley26.6%
 
Van Duyn24.3%
 
Beasley16.7%
 
Other32.4%
 


LenoirHolley14.2%
 
Van Duyn7.5%
 
Beasley4.5%
 
Other73.7%
 


LincolnHolley28.6%
 
Van Duyn16.3%
 
Beasley18.4%
 
Other36.7%
 


McDowellHolley28.0%
 
Van Duyn24.1%
 
Beasley10.3%
 
Other37.6%
 


MaconHolley27.5%
 
Van Duyn30.0%
 
Beasley10.1%
 
Other32.4%
 


MadisonHolley21.2%
 
Van Duyn47.0%
 
Beasley6.7%
 
Other25.1%
 


MartinHolley8.1%
 
Van Duyn4.8%
 
Beasley3.9%
 
Other83.3%
 


MecklenburgHolley30.4%
 
Van Duyn13.2%
 
Beasley29.3%
 
Other27.1%
 


MitchellHolley34.1%
 
Van Duyn32.2%
 
Beasley8.9%
 
Other24.8%
 


MontgomeryHolley17.1%
 
Van Duyn36.2%
 
Beasley10.3%
 
Other36.4%
 


MooreHolley26.3%
 
Van Duyn28.6%
 
Beasley12.0%
 
Other33.1%
 


NashHolley23.0%
 
Van Duyn17.6%
 
Beasley8.6%
 
Other50.9%
 


New HanoverHolley32.7%
 
Van Duyn28.3%
 
Beasley13.4%
 
Other25.6%
 


NorthamptonHolley10.9%
 
Van Duyn8.6%
 
Beasley7.1%
 
Other73.4%
 


OnslowHolley31.6%
 
Van Duyn7.5%
 
Beasley8.2%
 
Other52.7%
 


OrangeHolley21.2%
 
Van Duyn22.2%
 
Beasley37.7%
 
Other18.9%
 


PamlicoHolley14.7%
 
Van Duyn17.3%
 
Beasley6.0%
 
Other62.0%
 


PasquotankHolley28.3%
 
Van Duyn12.4%
 
Beasley8.2%
 
Other51.1%
 


PenderHolley28.9%
 
Van Duyn28.2%
 
Beasley11.9%
 
Other31.0%
 


PerquimansHolley26.0%
 
Van Duyn11.3%
 
Beasley6.6%
 
Other56.1%
 


PersonHolley19.2%
 
Van Duyn19.3%
 
Beasley26.6%
 
Other35.0%
 


PittHolley14.1%
 
Van Duyn7.3%
 
Beasley4.9%
 
Other73.7%
 


PolkHolley29.9%
 
Van Duyn30.7%
 
Beasley11.5%
 
Other27.9%
 


RandolphHolley28.2%
 
Van Duyn29.4%
 
Beasley10.4%
 
Other32.0%
 


RichmondHolley23.7%
 
Van Duyn8.6%
 
Beasley30.8%
 
Other36.9%
 


RobesonHolley18.5%
 
Van Duyn12.8%
 
Beasley11.5%
 
Other57.1%
 


RockinghamHolley28.6%
 
Van Duyn20.6%
 
Beasley20.2%
 
Other30.5%
 


RowanHolley34.0%
 
Van Duyn11.1%
 
Beasley17.2%
 
Other37.8%
 


RutherfordHolley29.9%
 
Van Duyn18.4%
 
Beasley13.9%
 
Other37.8%
 


SampsonHolley26.0%
 
Van Duyn19.1%
 
Beasley10.3%
 
Other44.6%
 


ScotlandHolley17.3%
 
Van Duyn12.3%
 
Beasley7.8%
 
Other62.6%
 


StanlyHolley26.5%
 
Van Duyn13.8%
 
Beasley12.7%
 
Other47.0%
 


StokesHolley23.7%
 
Van Duyn26.3%
 
Beasley9.7%
 
Other40.3%
 


SurryHolley23.8%
 
Van Duyn24.0%
 
Beasley14.6%
 
Other37.6%
 


SwainHolley26.7%
 
Van Duyn24.4%
 
Beasley12.0%
 
Other36.8%
 


TransylvaniaHolley26.2%
 
Van Duyn39.9%
 
Beasley9.2%
 
Other24.7%
 


TyrrellHolley16.0%
 
Van Duyn8.3%
 
Beasley5.4%
 
Other70.3%
 


UnionHolley38.2%
 
Van Duyn13.9%
 
Beasley16.5%
 
Other31.4%
 


VanceHolley12.1%
 
Van Duyn11.8%
 
Beasley53.7%
 
Other22.4%
 


WakeHolley31.4%
 
Van Duyn22.1%
 
Beasley19.1%
 
Other27.4%
 


WarrenHolley10.0%
 
Van Duyn9.2%
 
Beasley46.5%
 
Other34.3%
 


WashingtonHolley20.0%
 
Van Duyn6.2%
 
Beasley6.9%
 
Other66.9%
 


WataugaHolley29.3%
 
Van Duyn13.1%
 
Beasley10.2%
 
Other47.4%
 


WayneHolley25.4%
 
Van Duyn16.2%
 
Beasley9.4%
 
Other49.0%
 


WilkesHolley24.5%
 
Van Duyn22.8%
 
Beasley12.0%
 
Other40.7%
 


WilsonHolley14.7%
 
Van Duyn11.4%
 
Beasley5.8%
 
Other68.1%
 


YadkinHolley25.4%
 
Van Duyn23.1%
 
Beasley11.6%
 
Other40.0%
 


YanceyHolley20.3%
 
Van Duyn46.2%
 
Beasley6.8%
 
Other26.7%
 



National DataGraph for 2020 - North Carolina Results for 2020

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies


© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved