Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Adams	Wolf	40.6%
	Wagner	57.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Allegheny	Wolf	67.4%
	Wagner	31.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Armstrong	Wolf	35.9%
	Wagner	62.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Beaver	Wolf	53.3%
	Wagner	45.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Bedford	Wolf	23.4%
	Wagner	75.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.0%

Berks	Wolf	52.7%
	Wagner	45.5%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Blair	Wolf	33.6%
	Wagner	64.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Bradford	Wolf	33.6%
	Wagner	64.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Bucks	Wolf	58.5%
	Wagner	40.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Butler	Wolf	41.3%
	Wagner	56.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Cambria	Wolf	43.4%
	Wagner	55.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Cameron	Wolf	34.9%
	Wagner	63.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Carbon	Wolf	42.8%
	Wagner	55.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Centre	Wolf	57.6%
	Wagner	40.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Chester	Wolf	61.3%
	Wagner	37.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Clarion	Wolf	36.8%
	Wagner	61.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Clearfield	Wolf	34.3%
	Wagner	64.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Clinton	Wolf	44.2%
	Wagner	53.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Columbia	Wolf	43.4%
	Wagner	54.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Crawford	Wolf	39.7%
	Wagner	58.5%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Cumberland	Wolf	50.5%
	Wagner	47.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Dauphin	Wolf	59.0%
	Wagner	39.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Delaware	Wolf	66.7%
	Wagner	32.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.1%

Elk	Wolf	37.2%
	Wagner	61.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Erie	Wolf	59.8%
	Wagner	38.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Fayette	Wolf	48.4%
	Wagner	50.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Forest	Wolf	38.5%
	Wagner	59.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Franklin	Wolf	33.6%
	Wagner	64.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Fulton	Wolf	19.6%
	Wagner	79.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.1%

Greene	Wolf	46.9%
	Wagner	51.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Huntingdon	Wolf	31.7%
	Wagner	66.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Indiana	Wolf	43.3%
	Wagner	55.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Jefferson	Wolf	27.5%
	Wagner	70.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Juniata	Wolf	30.0%
	Wagner	68.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Lackawanna	Wolf	64.6%
	Wagner	34.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Lancaster	Wolf	47.5%
	Wagner	50.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Lawrence	Wolf	46.6%
	Wagner	51.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Lebanon	Wolf	41.1%
	Wagner	57.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Lehigh	Wolf	60.1%
	Wagner	38.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Luzerne	Wolf	51.7%
	Wagner	47.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Lycoming	Wolf	35.9%
	Wagner	62.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

McKean	Wolf	31.0%
	Wagner	67.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Mercer	Wolf	44.3%
	Wagner	54.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Mifflin	Wolf	30.0%
	Wagner	68.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Monroe	Wolf	57.8%
	Wagner	40.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Montgomery	Wolf	67.2%
	Wagner	31.5%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Montour	Wolf	46.0%
	Wagner	51.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Northampton	Wolf	57.1%
	Wagner	41.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Northumberland	Wolf	42.1%
	Wagner	55.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Perry	Wolf	34.3%
	Wagner	63.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Philadelphia	Wolf	87.4%
	Wagner	11.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.0%

Pike	Wolf	43.6%
	Wagner	54.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Potter	Wolf	23.2%
	Wagner	75.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Schuylkill	Wolf	43.5%
	Wagner	54.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Snyder	Wolf	36.3%
	Wagner	62.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Somerset	Wolf	31.8%
	Wagner	66.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Sullivan	Wolf	36.2%
	Wagner	61.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Susquehanna	Wolf	33.5%
	Wagner	64.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Tioga	Wolf	27.0%
	Wagner	70.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Union	Wolf	44.6%
	Wagner	53.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Venango	Wolf	39.9%
	Wagner	58.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Warren	Wolf	37.6%
	Wagner	60.5%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Washington	Wolf	48.4%
	Wagner	49.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Wayne	Wolf	39.9%
	Wagner	58.5%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Westmoreland	Wolf	46.4%
	Wagner	52.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Wyoming	Wolf	38.5%
	Wagner	59.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

York	Wolf	44.6%
	Wagner	53.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

National DataGraph for 2018 - Pennsylvania Results for 2018

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved