Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Anderson	Clinton	54.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	43.4%
	Other	2.0%

Bedford	Clinton	67.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	29.5%
	Other	2.9%

Benton	Clinton	63.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	32.5%
	Other	4.0%

Bledsoe	Clinton	60.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	32.9%
	Other	6.5%

Blount	Clinton	53.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	45.9%
	Other	1.1%

Bradley	Clinton	55.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	43.7%
	Other	1.1%

Campbell	Clinton	66.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	30.8%
	Other	2.6%

Cannon	Clinton	64.4%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	32.1%
	Other	3.5%

Carroll	Clinton	67.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	28.8%
	Other	3.7%

Carter	Clinton	47.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	51.0%
	Other	1.4%

Cheatham	Clinton	56.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	42.3%
	Other	1.6%

Chester	Clinton	68.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	29.1%
	Other	2.2%

Claiborne	Clinton	61.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	35.5%
	Other	2.8%

Clay	Clinton	70.9%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	27.0%
	Other	2.1%

Cocke	Clinton	54.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	43.1%
	Other	2.0%

Coffee	Clinton	62.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	34.6%
	Other	2.9%

Crockett	Clinton	78.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	19.1%
	Other	2.4%

Cumberland	Clinton	57.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	39.1%
	Other	3.0%

Davidson	Clinton	65.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	33.9%
	Other	1.0%

Decatur	Clinton	67.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	26.8%
	Other	5.7%

DeKalb	Clinton	66.4%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	29.6%
	Other	3.9%

Dickson	Clinton	67.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	31.2%
	Other	1.7%

Dyer	Clinton	71.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	26.5%
	Other	1.8%

Fayette	Clinton	84.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	15.2%
	Other	0.8%

Fentress	Clinton	63.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	34.2%
	Other	2.7%

Franklin	Clinton	64.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	33.0%
	Other	2.2%

Gibson	Clinton	76.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	21.2%
	Other	2.0%

Giles	Clinton	73.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	25.2%
	Other	1.6%

Grainger	Clinton	61.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	35.4%
	Other	3.5%

Greene	Clinton	53.4%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	44.2%
	Other	2.4%

Grundy	Clinton	64.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	29.7%
	Other	5.5%

Hamblen	Clinton	56.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	40.6%
	Other	3.0%

Hamilton	Clinton	64.4%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	34.7%
	Other	0.9%

Hancock	Clinton	53.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	44.3%
	Other	2.0%

Hardeman	Clinton	87.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	11.5%
	Other	0.8%

Hardin	Clinton	70.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	27.4%
	Other	1.9%

Hawkins	Clinton	58.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	38.2%
	Other	3.0%

Haywood	Clinton	88.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	10.6%
	Other	0.8%

Henderson	Clinton	68.9%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	29.7%
	Other	1.4%

Henry	Clinton	66.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	30.0%
	Other	3.8%

Hickman	Clinton	60.9%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	36.2%
	Other	2.9%

Houston	Clinton	67.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	29.6%
	Other	3.4%

Humphreys	Clinton	67.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	30.5%
	Other	1.7%

Jackson	Clinton	65.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	31.5%
	Other	3.2%

Jefferson	Clinton	54.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	43.6%
	Other	2.2%

Johnson	Clinton	51.4%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	47.0%
	Other	1.7%

Knox	Clinton	51.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	47.9%
	Other	1.1%

Lake	Clinton	77.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	19.7%
	Other	2.5%

Lauderdale	Clinton	82.9%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	15.5%
	Other	1.6%

Lawrence	Clinton	53.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	35.9%
	Other	10.5%

Lewis	Clinton	49.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	48.3%
	Other	2.5%

Lincoln	Clinton	67.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	30.3%
	Other	2.3%

Loudon	Clinton	60.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	37.6%
	Other	1.8%

McMinn	Clinton	60.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	36.6%
	Other	2.6%

McNairy	Clinton	74.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	23.7%
	Other	1.8%

Macon	Clinton	65.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	32.1%
	Other	2.7%

Madison	Clinton	80.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	18.5%
	Other	0.8%

Marion	Clinton	62.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	33.2%
	Other	4.8%

Marshall	Clinton	67.4%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	30.9%
	Other	1.7%

Maury	Clinton	63.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	35.1%
	Other	1.3%

Meigs	Clinton	66.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	30.3%
	Other	3.4%

Monroe	Clinton	63.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	30.8%
	Other	5.6%

Montgomery	Clinton	65.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	33.2%
	Other	1.6%

Moore	Clinton	65.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	29.0%
	Other	5.9%

Morgan	Clinton	58.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	37.1%
	Other	4.1%

Obion	Clinton	65.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	29.7%
	Other	5.0%

Overton	Clinton	59.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	31.9%
	Other	9.0%

Perry	Clinton	65.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	32.4%
	Other	2.4%

Pickett	Clinton	75.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	22.6%
	Other	1.8%

Polk	Clinton	47.9%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	35.2%
	Other	16.9%

Putnam	Clinton	51.9%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	45.8%
	Other	2.2%

Rhea	Clinton	57.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	37.9%
	Other	4.5%

Roane	Clinton	60.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	37.9%
	Other	2.0%

Robertson	Clinton	68.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	29.5%
	Other	2.0%

Rutherford	Clinton	57.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	41.8%
	Other	1.1%

Scott	Clinton	58.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	38.5%
	Other	3.2%

Sequatchie	Clinton	56.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	42.3%
	Other	1.6%

Sevier	Clinton	49.4%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	48.6%
	Other	2.0%

Shelby	Clinton	80.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	19.3%
	Other	0.6%

Smith	Clinton	70.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	27.3%
	Other	2.2%

Stewart	Clinton	66.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	30.6%
	Other	3.4%

Sullivan	Clinton	54.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	43.6%
	Other	1.9%

Sumner	Clinton	64.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	34.4%
	Other	1.3%

Tipton	Clinton	71.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	28.1%
	Other	0.8%

Trousdale	Clinton	72.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	25.7%
	Other	2.0%

Unicoi	Clinton	46.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	51.2%
	Other	2.6%

Union	Clinton	60.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	37.3%
	Other	2.7%

Van Buren	Clinton	67.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	26.8%
	Other	5.6%

Warren	Clinton	64.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	32.7%
	Other	2.9%

Washington	Clinton	45.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	53.1%
	Other	1.1%

Wayne	Clinton	63.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	34.2%
	Other	2.7%

Weakley	Clinton	63.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	33.3%
	Other	3.6%

White	Clinton	60.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	35.4%
	Other	4.0%

Williamson	Clinton	60.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	39.0%
	Other	0.7%

Wilson	Clinton	64.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	34.8%
	Other	1.2%

National DataGraph for 2016 - Tennessee Results for 2016

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved