1968 Presidential General Election Data Graphs - Michigan
Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.
Map

AlconaHumphrey30.4%
 
Nixon58.8%
 
Wallace10.7%
 
Other0.1%
 


AlgerHumphrey54.9%
 
Nixon40.0%
 
Wallace4.9%
 
Other0.2%
 


AlleganHumphrey29.7%
 
Nixon60.3%
 
Wallace9.8%
 
Other0.2%
 


AlpenaHumphrey42.5%
 
Nixon50.8%
 
Wallace6.6%
 
Other0.1%
 


AntrimHumphrey33.3%
 
Nixon59.2%
 
Wallace7.4%
 
Other0.0%
 


ArenacHumphrey39.4%
 
Nixon52.4%
 
Wallace8.1%
 
Other0.1%
 


BaragaHumphrey50.6%
 
Nixon45.4%
 
Wallace3.5%
 
Other0.4%
 


BarryHumphrey33.8%
 
Nixon55.1%
 
Wallace10.9%
 
Other0.2%
 


BayHumphrey50.3%
 
Nixon44.1%
 
Wallace5.4%
 
Other0.2%
 


BenzieHumphrey32.7%
 
Nixon60.9%
 
Wallace6.2%
 
Other0.2%
 


BerrienHumphrey33.8%
 
Nixon51.1%
 
Wallace14.8%
 
Other0.3%
 


BranchHumphrey35.7%
 
Nixon55.9%
 
Wallace8.2%
 
Other0.2%
 


CalhounHumphrey41.2%
 
Nixon47.6%
 
Wallace10.8%
 
Other0.4%
 


CassHumphrey37.7%
 
Nixon46.9%
 
Wallace15.1%
 
Other0.2%
 


CharlevoixHumphrey36.5%
 
Nixon55.1%
 
Wallace8.3%
 
Other0.1%
 


CheboyganHumphrey41.2%
 
Nixon49.6%
 
Wallace9.2%
 
Other0.0%
 


ChippewaHumphrey40.1%
 
Nixon52.0%
 
Wallace7.7%
 
Other0.1%
 


ClareHumphrey32.7%
 
Nixon56.9%
 
Wallace10.3%
 
Other0.1%
 


ClintonHumphrey33.5%
 
Nixon56.8%
 
Wallace9.6%
 
Other0.2%
 


CrawfordHumphrey36.7%
 
Nixon55.0%
 
Wallace8.1%
 
Other0.1%
 


DeltaHumphrey54.4%
 
Nixon40.6%
 
Wallace4.9%
 
Other0.1%
 


DickinsonHumphrey51.2%
 
Nixon44.0%
 
Wallace4.8%
 
Other0.1%
 


EatonHumphrey33.6%
 
Nixon57.1%
 
Wallace9.1%
 
Other0.2%
 


EmmetHumphrey35.0%
 
Nixon58.8%
 
Wallace6.0%
 
Other0.2%
 


GeneseeHumphrey45.8%
 
Nixon39.0%
 
Wallace15.0%
 
Other0.2%
 


GladwinHumphrey33.2%
 
Nixon56.6%
 
Wallace10.2%
 
Other0.1%
 


GogebicHumphrey56.0%
 
Nixon39.7%
 
Wallace4.2%
 
Other0.1%
 


Grand TraverseHumphrey32.5%
 
Nixon61.5%
 
Wallace5.8%
 
Other0.2%
 


GratiotHumphrey30.1%
 
Nixon62.7%
 
Wallace7.1%
 
Other0.1%
 


HillsdaleHumphrey28.3%
 
Nixon63.3%
 
Wallace8.2%
 
Other0.2%
 


HoughtonHumphrey49.4%
 
Nixon46.9%
 
Wallace3.3%
 
Other0.3%
 


HuronHumphrey26.6%
 
Nixon64.5%
 
Wallace8.7%
 
Other0.2%
 


InghamHumphrey41.1%
 
Nixon51.5%
 
Wallace7.1%
 
Other0.4%
 


IoniaHumphrey37.9%
 
Nixon54.0%
 
Wallace7.9%
 
Other0.2%
 


IoscoHumphrey34.5%
 
Nixon55.4%
 
Wallace10.0%
 
Other0.0%
 


IronHumphrey53.1%
 
Nixon42.4%
 
Wallace4.4%
 
Other0.1%
 


IsabellaHumphrey35.9%
 
Nixon57.4%
 
Wallace6.5%
 
Other0.2%
 


JacksonHumphrey35.1%
 
Nixon53.7%
 
Wallace11.0%
 
Other0.3%
 


KalamazooHumphrey35.8%
 
Nixon53.9%
 
Wallace10.0%
 
Other0.3%
 


KalkaskaHumphrey33.7%
 
Nixon53.3%
 
Wallace12.9%
 
Other0.1%
 


KentHumphrey38.7%
 
Nixon53.7%
 
Wallace7.2%
 
Other0.4%
 


KeweenawHumphrey50.4%
 
Nixon44.0%
 
Wallace5.4%
 
Other0.2%
 


LakeHumphrey53.0%
 
Nixon39.1%
 
Wallace7.9%
 
Other0.1%
 


LapeerHumphrey32.2%
 
Nixon54.9%
 
Wallace12.9%
 
Other0.1%
 


LeelanauHumphrey33.5%
 
Nixon60.1%
 
Wallace6.3%
 
Other0.2%
 


LenaweeHumphrey36.2%
 
Nixon55.9%
 
Wallace7.5%
 
Other0.4%
 


LivingstonHumphrey35.9%
 
Nixon51.0%
 
Wallace12.9%
 
Other0.2%
 


LuceHumphrey36.9%
 
Nixon58.3%
 
Wallace4.7%
 
Other0.0%
 


MackinacHumphrey38.3%
 
Nixon54.8%
 
Wallace6.9%
 
Other0.0%
 


MacombHumphrey55.2%
 
Nixon30.4%
 
Wallace14.1%
 
Other0.3%
 


ManisteeHumphrey44.2%
 
Nixon48.2%
 
Wallace7.4%
 
Other0.2%
 


MarquetteHumphrey53.3%
 
Nixon42.7%
 
Wallace3.8%
 
Other0.2%
 


MasonHumphrey37.2%
 
Nixon54.0%
 
Wallace8.7%
 
Other0.1%
 


MecostaHumphrey32.5%
 
Nixon60.0%
 
Wallace7.4%
 
Other0.1%
 


MenomineeHumphrey48.2%
 
Nixon45.5%
 
Wallace6.1%
 
Other0.1%
 


MidlandHumphrey31.4%
 
Nixon60.6%
 
Wallace7.8%
 
Other0.2%
 


MissaukeeHumphrey23.1%
 
Nixon67.7%
 
Wallace9.2%
 
Other0.1%
 


MonroeHumphrey47.8%
 
Nixon39.6%
 
Wallace12.3%
 
Other0.2%
 


MontcalmHumphrey35.6%
 
Nixon55.9%
 
Wallace8.3%
 
Other0.2%
 


MontmorencyHumphrey34.5%
 
Nixon54.4%
 
Wallace11.1%
 
Other0.1%
 


MuskegonHumphrey41.7%
 
Nixon48.1%
 
Wallace9.9%
 
Other0.3%
 


NewaygoHumphrey30.5%
 
Nixon60.0%
 
Wallace9.4%
 
Other0.1%
 


OaklandHumphrey44.8%
 
Nixon45.3%
 
Wallace9.6%
 
Other0.4%
 


OceanaHumphrey30.9%
 
Nixon56.2%
 
Wallace12.6%
 
Other0.3%
 


OgemawHumphrey35.6%
 
Nixon54.6%
 
Wallace9.8%
 
Other0.1%
 


OntonagonHumphrey49.2%
 
Nixon45.7%
 
Wallace5.0%
 
Other0.1%
 


OsceolaHumphrey26.0%
 
Nixon63.8%
 
Wallace10.0%
 
Other0.2%
 


OscodaHumphrey30.5%
 
Nixon61.0%
 
Wallace8.5%
 


OtsegoHumphrey43.8%
 
Nixon49.3%
 
Wallace6.8%
 
Other0.1%
 


OttawaHumphrey25.2%
 
Nixon67.6%
 
Wallace7.0%
 
Other0.2%
 


Presque IsleHumphrey43.8%
 
Nixon48.8%
 
Wallace7.3%
 
Other0.0%
 


RoscommonHumphrey34.8%
 
Nixon55.9%
 
Wallace9.1%
 
Other0.2%
 


SaginawHumphrey41.7%
 
Nixon49.2%
 
Wallace8.9%
 
Other0.2%
 


St. ClairHumphrey38.1%
 
Nixon49.4%
 
Wallace12.3%
 
Other0.2%
 


St. JosephHumphrey30.7%
 
Nixon59.2%
 
Wallace10.0%
 
Other0.2%
 


SanilacHumphrey22.5%
 
Nixon65.5%
 
Wallace11.9%
 
Other0.1%
 


SchoolcraftHumphrey48.6%
 
Nixon45.4%
 
Wallace5.9%
 
Other0.1%
 


ShiawasseeHumphrey38.3%
 
Nixon50.9%
 
Wallace10.5%
 
Other0.3%
 


TuscolaHumphrey28.3%
 
Nixon61.4%
 
Wallace10.1%
 
Other0.2%
 


Van BurenHumphrey35.4%
 
Nixon51.8%
 
Wallace12.4%
 
Other0.3%
 


WashtenawHumphrey42.5%
 
Nixon46.8%
 
Wallace9.6%
 
Other1.1%
 


WayneHumphrey63.2%
 
Nixon26.2%
 
Wallace10.2%
 
Other0.4%
 


WexfordHumphrey36.6%
 
Nixon56.4%
 
Wallace6.9%
 
Other0.1%
 



National DataGraph for 1968 - Michigan Results for 1968

Login

Terms of Service - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies


© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved