Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2017-03-04

Map

Map

Allen	Rome	45.4%
	Shultz	50.5%
	Other	4.1%

Anderson	Rome	49.7%
	Shultz	48.5%
	Other	1.7%

Atchison	Rome	52.0%
	Shultz	46.4%
	Other	1.6%

Barber	Rome	45.2%
	Shultz	52.1%
	Other	2.6%

Barton	Rome	54.5%
	Shultz	42.5%
	Other	3.0%

Bourbon	Rome	46.4%
	Shultz	50.1%
	Other	3.4%

Brown	Rome	31.9%
	Shultz	65.9%
	Other	2.2%

Butler	Rome	53.0%
	Shultz	43.8%
	Other	3.2%

Chase	Rome	41.1%
	Shultz	56.4%
	Other	2.5%

Chautauqua	Rome	33.7%
	Shultz	63.6%
	Other	2.7%

Cherokee	Rome	54.7%
	Shultz	42.7%
	Other	2.7%

Cheyenne	Rome	36.0%
	Shultz	60.8%
	Other	3.3%

Clark	Rome	43.8%
	Shultz	52.1%
	Other	4.2%

Clay	Rome	35.7%
	Shultz	60.2%
	Other	4.1%

Cloud	Rome	46.3%
	Shultz	50.8%
	Other	3.0%

Coffey	Rome	38.7%
	Shultz	59.3%
	Other	2.0%

Comanche	Rome	40.3%
	Shultz	56.7%
	Other	3.0%

Cowley	Rome	50.2%
	Shultz	46.5%
	Other	3.3%

Crawford	Rome	53.2%
	Shultz	44.3%
	Other	2.5%

Decatur	Rome	47.9%
	Shultz	49.9%
	Other	2.2%

Dickinson	Rome	37.7%
	Shultz	60.2%
	Other	2.1%

Doniphan	Rome	37.5%
	Shultz	60.6%
	Other	1.9%

Douglas	Rome	42.7%
	Shultz	55.6%
	Other	1.7%

Edwards	Rome	49.6%
	Shultz	48.1%
	Other	2.3%

Elk	Rome	36.3%
	Shultz	60.8%
	Other	2.9%

Ellis	Rome	67.5%
	Shultz	31.0%
	Other	1.4%

Ellsworth	Rome	48.2%
	Shultz	49.5%
	Other	2.3%

Finney	Rome	51.3%
	Shultz	46.4%
	Other	2.3%

Ford	Rome	51.5%
	Shultz	46.5%
	Other	1.9%

Franklin	Rome	43.8%
	Shultz	53.9%
	Other	2.3%

Geary	Rome	53.8%
	Shultz	43.0%
	Other	3.2%

Gove	Rome	46.3%
	Shultz	51.3%
	Other	2.5%

Graham	Rome	40.9%
	Shultz	57.1%
	Other	2.0%

Grant	Rome	45.1%
	Shultz	53.0%
	Other	1.9%

Gray	Rome	50.4%
	Shultz	48.2%
	Other	1.4%

Greeley	Rome	43.3%
	Shultz	54.7%
	Other	1.9%

Greenwood	Rome	37.9%
	Shultz	60.4%
	Other	1.7%

Hamilton	Rome	47.6%
	Shultz	50.9%
	Other	1.5%

Harper	Rome	40.3%
	Shultz	58.0%
	Other	1.7%

Harvey	Rome	45.9%
	Shultz	52.5%
	Other	1.5%

Haskell	Rome	48.2%
	Shultz	49.6%
	Other	2.1%

Hodgeman	Rome	48.0%
	Shultz	50.7%
	Other	1.3%

Jackson	Rome	39.4%
	Shultz	59.1%
	Other	1.5%

Jefferson	Rome	32.6%
	Shultz	66.1%
	Other	1.3%

Jewell	Rome	35.4%
	Shultz	61.7%
	Other	2.9%

Johnson	Rome	42.9%
	Shultz	55.0%
	Other	2.1%

Kearny	Rome	45.3%
	Shultz	53.5%
	Other	1.2%

Kingman	Rome	48.3%
	Shultz	49.7%
	Other	2.0%

Kiowa	Rome	37.7%
	Shultz	58.9%
	Other	3.4%

Labette	Rome	49.0%
	Shultz	48.6%
	Other	2.4%

Lane	Rome	44.3%
	Shultz	54.5%
	Other	1.2%

Leavenworth	Rome	53.1%
	Shultz	45.8%
	Other	1.2%

Lincoln	Rome	35.8%
	Shultz	62.7%
	Other	1.5%

Linn	Rome	38.5%
	Shultz	60.4%
	Other	1.1%

Logan	Rome	44.0%
	Shultz	54.3%
	Other	1.8%

Lyon	Rome	49.0%
	Shultz	49.5%
	Other	1.5%

McPherson	Rome	44.5%
	Shultz	53.4%
	Other	2.1%

Marion	Rome	37.6%
	Shultz	60.6%
	Other	1.8%

Marshall	Rome	43.3%
	Shultz	55.4%
	Other	1.2%

Meade	Rome	42.0%
	Shultz	54.9%
	Other	3.0%

Miami	Rome	52.6%
	Shultz	45.8%
	Other	1.7%

Mitchell	Rome	44.5%
	Shultz	53.7%
	Other	1.8%

Montgomery	Rome	44.1%
	Shultz	53.9%
	Other	2.0%

Morris	Rome	41.3%
	Shultz	56.9%
	Other	1.8%

Morton	Rome	50.4%
	Shultz	47.8%
	Other	1.8%

Nemaha	Rome	49.5%
	Shultz	48.4%
	Other	2.0%

Neosho	Rome	46.5%
	Shultz	50.6%
	Other	2.9%

Ness	Rome	45.5%
	Shultz	52.7%
	Other	1.8%

Norton	Rome	37.3%
	Shultz	60.2%
	Other	2.5%

Osage	Rome	44.9%
	Shultz	53.7%
	Other	1.4%

Osborne	Rome	34.2%
	Shultz	62.5%
	Other	3.3%

Ottawa	Rome	40.5%
	Shultz	56.7%
	Other	2.8%

Pawnee	Rome	56.0%
	Shultz	42.6%
	Other	1.4%

Phillips	Rome	33.9%
	Shultz	62.7%
	Other	3.4%

Pottawatomie	Rome	38.3%
	Shultz	60.1%
	Other	1.6%

Pratt	Rome	48.7%
	Shultz	48.8%
	Other	2.5%

Rawlins	Rome	42.2%
	Shultz	55.5%
	Other	2.3%

Reno	Rome	49.0%
	Shultz	48.2%
	Other	2.8%

Republic	Rome	38.8%
	Shultz	59.1%
	Other	2.2%

Rice	Rome	48.1%
	Shultz	49.8%
	Other	2.0%

Riley	Rome	50.0%
	Shultz	47.7%
	Other	2.3%

Rooks	Rome	46.9%
	Shultz	49.9%
	Other	3.2%

Rush	Rome	46.9%
	Shultz	51.1%
	Other	2.0%

Russell	Rome	40.0%
	Shultz	58.2%
	Other	1.8%

Saline	Rome	47.1%
	Shultz	51.0%
	Other	1.8%

Scott	Rome	40.9%
	Shultz	56.2%
	Other	2.9%

Sedgwick	Rome	52.9%
	Shultz	39.6%
	Other	7.6%

Seward	Rome	47.1%
	Shultz	50.2%
	Other	2.7%

Shawnee	Rome	47.9%
	Shultz	50.3%
	Other	1.8%

Sheridan	Rome	50.3%
	Shultz	48.3%
	Other	1.4%

Sherman	Rome	48.3%
	Shultz	49.0%
	Other	2.7%

Smith	Rome	35.0%
	Shultz	62.3%
	Other	2.6%

Stafford	Rome	47.2%
	Shultz	50.8%
	Other	2.0%

Stanton	Rome	45.7%
	Shultz	51.4%
	Other	2.9%

Stevens	Rome	46.7%
	Shultz	50.6%
	Other	2.8%

Sumner	Rome	49.7%
	Shultz	47.4%
	Other	2.9%

Thomas	Rome	48.9%
	Shultz	49.2%
	Other	1.8%

Trego	Rome	51.9%
	Shultz	46.8%
	Other	1.3%

Wabaunsee	Rome	35.9%
	Shultz	61.9%
	Other	2.2%

Wallace	Rome	35.7%
	Shultz	59.7%
	Other	4.7%

Washington	Rome	34.1%
	Shultz	63.6%
	Other	2.3%

Wichita	Rome	44.7%
	Shultz	53.9%
	Other	1.5%

Wilson	Rome	38.5%
	Shultz	59.2%
	Other	2.3%

Woodson	Rome	39.9%
	Shultz	58.3%
	Other	1.8%

Wyandotte	Rome	59.8%
	Shultz	33.2%
	Other	7.0%

National DataGraph for 1970 - Kansas Results for 1970

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved