Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2016-06-08

Map

Map

Adams	Benedict	45.0%
	Gleason	53.8%
	Other	1.2%

Allegheny	Benedict	56.1%
	Gleason	42.2%
	Other	1.7%

Armstrong	Benedict	52.8%
	Gleason	45.3%
	Other	1.9%

Beaver	Benedict	65.0%
	Gleason	32.7%
	Other	2.3%

Bedford	Benedict	39.3%
	Gleason	59.8%
	Other	0.9%

Berks	Benedict	57.6%
	Gleason	41.2%
	Other	1.2%

Blair	Benedict	39.2%
	Gleason	59.6%
	Other	1.2%

Bradford	Benedict	36.5%
	Gleason	62.1%
	Other	1.5%

Bucks	Benedict	50.4%
	Gleason	48.1%
	Other	1.5%

Butler	Benedict	49.9%
	Gleason	48.1%
	Other	2.1%

Cambria	Benedict	44.8%
	Gleason	54.1%
	Other	1.1%

Cameron	Benedict	44.9%
	Gleason	53.9%
	Other	1.2%

Carbon	Benedict	57.3%
	Gleason	41.8%
	Other	0.9%

Centre	Benedict	45.6%
	Gleason	52.2%
	Other	2.3%

Chester	Benedict	38.4%
	Gleason	60.4%
	Other	1.1%

Clarion	Benedict	53.3%
	Gleason	45.2%
	Other	1.4%

Clearfield	Benedict	50.1%
	Gleason	48.8%
	Other	1.1%

Clinton	Benedict	53.3%
	Gleason	45.2%
	Other	1.5%

Columbia	Benedict	57.0%
	Gleason	41.5%
	Other	1.5%

Crawford	Benedict	55.3%
	Gleason	43.3%
	Other	1.5%

Cumberland	Benedict	38.8%
	Gleason	60.2%
	Other	1.0%

Dauphin	Benedict	43.0%
	Gleason	55.8%
	Other	1.2%

Delaware	Benedict	45.4%
	Gleason	53.8%
	Other	0.7%

Elk	Benedict	56.2%
	Gleason	42.8%
	Other	1.0%

Erie	Benedict	69.6%
	Gleason	29.4%
	Other	1.1%

Fayette	Benedict	64.3%
	Gleason	34.5%
	Other	1.2%

Forest	Benedict	48.9%
	Gleason	49.2%
	Other	1.9%

Franklin	Benedict	46.7%
	Gleason	50.9%
	Other	2.4%

Fulton	Benedict	49.0%
	Gleason	49.1%
	Other	1.9%

Greene	Benedict	69.9%
	Gleason	28.5%
	Other	1.6%

Huntingdon	Benedict	39.4%
	Gleason	58.7%
	Other	1.9%

Indiana	Benedict	46.5%
	Gleason	52.0%
	Other	1.5%

Jefferson	Benedict	45.3%
	Gleason	53.4%
	Other	1.3%

Juniata	Benedict	46.1%
	Gleason	52.5%
	Other	1.4%

Lackawanna	Benedict	58.6%
	Gleason	40.6%
	Other	0.8%

Lancaster	Benedict	34.9%
	Gleason	64.0%
	Other	1.1%

Lawrence	Benedict	59.5%
	Gleason	39.1%
	Other	1.4%

Lebanon	Benedict	37.8%
	Gleason	61.0%
	Other	1.2%

Lehigh	Benedict	52.7%
	Gleason	46.3%
	Other	1.0%

Luzerne	Benedict	59.9%
	Gleason	39.5%
	Other	0.6%

Lycoming	Benedict	45.8%
	Gleason	52.3%
	Other	1.8%

McKean	Benedict	39.9%
	Gleason	59.3%
	Other	0.7%

Mercer	Benedict	56.1%
	Gleason	43.0%
	Other	0.9%

Mifflin	Benedict	45.8%
	Gleason	53.3%
	Other	0.9%

Monroe	Benedict	49.7%
	Gleason	49.2%
	Other	1.1%

Montgomery	Benedict	42.2%
	Gleason	56.9%
	Other	0.9%

Montour	Benedict	48.5%
	Gleason	49.4%
	Other	2.1%

Northampton	Benedict	61.0%
	Gleason	37.7%
	Other	1.3%

Northumberland	Benedict	49.6%
	Gleason	48.7%
	Other	1.8%

Perry	Benedict	41.0%
	Gleason	57.6%
	Other	1.3%

Philadelphia	Benedict	70.2%
	Gleason	28.7%
	Other	1.0%

Pike	Benedict	39.0%
	Gleason	59.9%
	Other	1.1%

Potter	Benedict	45.0%
	Gleason	53.5%
	Other	1.5%

Schuylkill	Benedict	52.9%
	Gleason	44.6%
	Other	2.5%

Snyder	Benedict	32.4%
	Gleason	65.8%
	Other	1.8%

Somerset	Benedict	42.4%
	Gleason	56.4%
	Other	1.2%

Sullivan	Benedict	49.7%
	Gleason	49.6%
	Other	0.7%

Susquehanna	Benedict	40.0%
	Gleason	58.5%
	Other	1.5%

Tioga	Benedict	36.4%
	Gleason	62.0%
	Other	1.6%

Union	Benedict	36.4%
	Gleason	61.7%
	Other	1.9%

Venango	Benedict	45.6%
	Gleason	52.9%
	Other	1.5%

Warren	Benedict	48.4%
	Gleason	50.4%
	Other	1.2%

Washington	Benedict	64.8%
	Gleason	32.8%
	Other	2.4%

Wayne	Benedict	35.9%
	Gleason	62.5%
	Other	1.6%

Westmoreland	Benedict	57.7%
	Gleason	41.0%
	Other	1.3%

Wyoming	Benedict	38.9%
	Gleason	60.0%
	Other	1.1%

York	Benedict	41.9%
	Gleason	57.2%
	Other	0.8%

National DataGraph for 1976 - Pennsylvania Results for 1976

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved