Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2018-10-12

Map

Map

Alamance	Ingram	42.7%
	Helms	57.3%

Alexander	Ingram	43.4%
	Helms	56.6%

Alleghany	Ingram	49.5%
	Helms	50.5%

Anson	Ingram	67.7%
	Helms	32.3%

Ashe	Ingram	46.7%
	Helms	53.3%

Avery	Ingram	27.6%
	Helms	72.4%

Beaufort	Ingram	48.7%
	Helms	51.3%

Bertie	Ingram	59.3%
	Helms	40.7%

Bladen	Ingram	60.2%
	Helms	39.8%

Brunswick	Ingram	50.7%
	Helms	49.3%

Buncombe	Ingram	48.5%
	Helms	51.5%

Burke	Ingram	46.8%
	Helms	53.2%

Cabarrus	Ingram	39.7%
	Helms	60.3%

Caldwell	Ingram	45.8%
	Helms	54.2%

Camden	Ingram	58.2%
	Helms	41.8%

Carteret	Ingram	44.8%
	Helms	55.2%

Caswell	Ingram	50.4%
	Helms	49.6%

Catawba	Ingram	38.0%
	Helms	62.0%

Chatham	Ingram	50.6%
	Helms	49.4%

Cherokee	Ingram	49.9%
	Helms	50.1%

Chowan	Ingram	52.7%
	Helms	47.3%

Clay	Ingram	42.9%
	Helms	57.1%

Cleveland	Ingram	51.6%
	Helms	48.4%

Columbus	Ingram	58.3%
	Helms	41.7%

Craven	Ingram	46.3%
	Helms	53.7%

Cumberland	Ingram	48.8%
	Helms	51.2%

Currituck	Ingram	56.1%
	Helms	43.9%

Dare	Ingram	47.8%
	Helms	52.2%

Davidson	Ingram	45.4%
	Helms	54.6%

Davie	Ingram	35.8%
	Helms	64.2%

Duplin	Ingram	49.0%
	Helms	51.0%

Durham	Ingram	48.6%
	Helms	51.4%

Edgecombe	Ingram	46.6%
	Helms	53.4%

Forsyth	Ingram	43.3%
	Helms	56.7%

Franklin	Ingram	43.8%
	Helms	56.2%

Gaston	Ingram	44.0%
	Helms	56.0%

Gates	Ingram	65.8%
	Helms	34.2%

Graham	Ingram	46.9%
	Helms	53.1%

Granville	Ingram	42.6%
	Helms	57.4%

Greene	Ingram	44.3%
	Helms	55.7%

Guilford	Ingram	45.3%
	Helms	54.7%

Halifax	Ingram	41.1%
	Helms	58.9%

Harnett	Ingram	41.0%
	Helms	59.0%

Haywood	Ingram	55.3%
	Helms	44.7%

Henderson	Ingram	38.1%
	Helms	61.9%

Hertford	Ingram	57.7%
	Helms	42.3%

Hoke	Ingram	59.5%
	Helms	40.5%

Hyde	Ingram	50.6%
	Helms	49.4%

Iredell	Ingram	41.5%
	Helms	58.5%

Jackson	Ingram	54.0%
	Helms	46.0%

Johnston	Ingram	36.6%
	Helms	63.4%

Jones	Ingram	49.5%
	Helms	50.5%

Lee	Ingram	40.9%
	Helms	59.1%

Lenoir	Ingram	36.8%
	Helms	63.2%

Lincoln	Ingram	50.4%
	Helms	49.6%

McDowell	Ingram	51.2%
	Helms	48.8%

Macon	Ingram	44.2%
	Helms	55.8%

Madison	Ingram	56.6%
	Helms	43.4%

Martin	Ingram	50.8%
	Helms	49.2%

Mecklenburg	Ingram	43.2%
	Helms	56.8%

Mitchell	Ingram	30.5%
	Helms	69.5%

Montgomery	Ingram	50.5%
	Helms	49.5%

Moore	Ingram	39.4%
	Helms	60.6%

Nash	Ingram	33.3%
	Helms	66.7%

New Hanover	Ingram	38.3%
	Helms	61.7%

Northampton	Ingram	64.7%
	Helms	35.3%

Onslow	Ingram	45.8%
	Helms	54.2%

Orange	Ingram	59.8%
	Helms	40.2%

Pamlico	Ingram	55.2%
	Helms	44.8%

Pasquotank	Ingram	51.9%
	Helms	48.1%

Pender	Ingram	48.3%
	Helms	51.7%

Perquimans	Ingram	54.3%
	Helms	45.7%

Person	Ingram	31.2%
	Helms	68.8%

Pitt	Ingram	46.1%
	Helms	53.9%

Polk	Ingram	43.7%
	Helms	56.3%

Randolph	Ingram	38.3%
	Helms	61.7%

Richmond	Ingram	68.4%
	Helms	31.6%

Robeson	Ingram	60.0%
	Helms	40.0%

Rockingham	Ingram	48.9%
	Helms	51.1%

Rowan	Ingram	43.0%
	Helms	57.0%

Rutherford	Ingram	51.0%
	Helms	49.0%

Sampson	Ingram	44.0%
	Helms	56.0%

Scotland	Ingram	55.4%
	Helms	44.6%

Stanly	Ingram	44.8%
	Helms	55.2%

Stokes	Ingram	46.2%
	Helms	53.8%

Surry	Ingram	47.9%
	Helms	52.1%

Swain	Ingram	56.6%
	Helms	43.4%

Transylvania	Ingram	48.5%
	Helms	51.5%

Tyrrell	Ingram	59.4%
	Helms	40.6%

Union	Ingram	45.1%
	Helms	54.9%

Vance	Ingram	41.6%
	Helms	58.4%

Wake	Ingram	41.0%
	Helms	59.0%

Warren	Ingram	54.3%
	Helms	45.7%

Washington	Ingram	61.8%
	Helms	38.2%

Watauga	Ingram	45.2%
	Helms	54.8%

Wayne	Ingram	39.1%
	Helms	60.9%

Wilkes	Ingram	43.4%
	Helms	56.6%

Wilson	Ingram	38.4%
	Helms	61.6%

Yadkin	Ingram	35.3%
	Helms	64.7%

Yancey	Ingram	52.2%
	Helms	47.8%

National DataGraph for 1978 - North Carolina Results for 1978

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved