Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2014-07-10

Map

Map

Adair	Zink	22.3%
	Nickles	35.0%
	Noble	37.3%
	Other	5.4%

Alfalfa	Zink	31.8%
	Nickles	29.2%
	Noble	34.1%
	Other	5.0%

Atoka	Zink	37.1%
	Nickles	44.9%
	Noble	10.1%
	Other	7.9%

Beaver	Zink	16.5%
	Nickles	45.9%
	Noble	28.4%
	Other	9.2%

Beckham	Zink	38.5%
	Nickles	35.8%
	Noble	23.0%
	Other	2.7%

Blaine	Zink	22.7%
	Nickles	48.5%
	Noble	26.1%
	Other	2.7%

Bryan	Zink	60.7%
	Nickles	13.1%
	Noble	13.1%
	Other	13.1%

Caddo	Zink	24.4%
	Nickles	40.2%
	Noble	32.4%
	Other	3.1%

Canadian	Zink	28.5%
	Nickles	35.7%
	Noble	33.1%
	Other	2.7%

Carter	Zink	21.4%
	Nickles	10.8%
	Noble	66.0%
	Other	1.8%

Cherokee	Zink	32.3%
	Nickles	39.9%
	Noble	23.5%
	Other	4.3%

Choctaw	Zink	39.6%
	Nickles	36.6%
	Noble	12.9%
	Other	10.9%

Cimarron	Zink	18.6%
	Nickles	56.8%
	Noble	18.6%
	Other	6.0%

Cleveland	Zink	30.1%
	Nickles	28.7%
	Noble	37.9%
	Other	3.2%

Coal	Zink	21.7%
	Nickles	39.1%
	Noble	21.7%
	Other	17.4%

Comanche	Zink	46.2%
	Nickles	20.2%
	Noble	29.3%
	Other	4.3%

Cotton	Zink	31.3%
	Nickles	29.2%
	Noble	27.1%
	Other	12.5%

Craig	Zink	30.3%
	Nickles	39.1%
	Noble	25.6%
	Other	5.0%

Creek	Zink	35.8%
	Nickles	30.2%
	Noble	31.7%
	Other	2.3%

Custer	Zink	28.5%
	Nickles	26.4%
	Noble	43.3%
	Other	1.8%

Delaware	Zink	34.9%
	Nickles	28.1%
	Noble	33.7%
	Other	3.3%

Dewey	Zink	21.7%
	Nickles	39.6%
	Noble	34.8%
	Other	3.8%

Ellis	Zink	21.6%
	Nickles	36.1%
	Noble	39.1%
	Other	3.2%

Garfield	Zink	32.3%
	Nickles	26.4%
	Noble	37.7%
	Other	3.6%

Garvin	Zink	51.0%
	Nickles	22.1%
	Noble	26.4%
	Other	0.5%

Grady	Zink	26.0%
	Nickles	31.9%
	Noble	37.8%
	Other	4.2%

Grant	Zink	11.7%
	Nickles	62.9%
	Noble	21.6%
	Other	3.8%

Greer	Zink	53.8%
	Nickles	21.8%
	Noble	24.4%

Harmon	Zink	62.5%
	Nickles	25.0%
	Noble	0.0%
	Other	12.5%

Harper	Zink	33.6%
	Nickles	34.3%
	Noble	30.6%
	Other	1.5%

Haskell	Zink	16.1%
	Nickles	72.7%
	Noble	10.5%
	Other	0.7%

Hughes	Zink	36.9%
	Nickles	34.0%
	Noble	25.2%
	Other	3.9%

Jackson	Zink	48.5%
	Nickles	28.4%
	Noble	16.7%
	Other	6.4%

Jefferson	Zink	9.1%
	Nickles	77.3%
	Noble	13.6%

Johnston	Zink	28.2%
	Nickles	20.5%
	Noble	33.3%
	Other	17.9%

Kay	Zink	14.0%
	Nickles	70.0%
	Noble	14.5%
	Other	1.5%

Kingfisher	Zink	26.4%
	Nickles	34.6%
	Noble	36.2%
	Other	2.7%

Kiowa	Zink	46.1%
	Nickles	24.2%
	Noble	27.3%
	Other	2.4%

Latimer	Zink	45.2%
	Nickles	29.4%
	Noble	21.4%
	Other	4.0%

Le Flore	Zink	30.1%
	Nickles	31.0%
	Noble	29.3%
	Other	9.6%

Lincoln	Zink	28.4%
	Nickles	31.9%
	Noble	36.9%
	Other	2.9%

Logan	Zink	24.2%
	Nickles	46.3%
	Noble	26.5%
	Other	3.0%

Love	Zink	36.8%
	Nickles	10.5%
	Noble	50.0%
	Other	2.6%

McClain	Zink	31.5%
	Nickles	33.3%
	Noble	32.7%
	Other	2.5%

McCurtain	Zink	18.8%
	Nickles	45.3%
	Noble	20.5%
	Other	15.4%

McIntosh	Zink	25.1%
	Nickles	42.3%
	Noble	28.6%
	Other	4.0%

Major	Zink	25.2%
	Nickles	38.8%
	Noble	33.1%
	Other	2.9%

Marshall	Zink	49.4%
	Nickles	20.0%
	Noble	24.7%
	Other	5.9%

Mayes	Zink	33.8%
	Nickles	31.1%
	Noble	32.2%
	Other	2.9%

Murray	Zink	20.0%
	Nickles	17.1%
	Noble	60.0%
	Other	2.9%

Muskogee	Zink	37.0%
	Nickles	27.1%
	Noble	32.3%
	Other	3.6%

Noble	Zink	16.9%
	Nickles	49.2%
	Noble	32.3%
	Other	1.6%

Nowata	Zink	28.3%
	Nickles	33.3%
	Noble	35.3%
	Other	3.0%

Okfuskee	Zink	27.8%
	Nickles	41.3%
	Noble	28.6%
	Other	2.4%

Oklahoma	Zink	29.8%
	Nickles	35.3%
	Noble	30.7%
	Other	4.2%

Okmulgee	Zink	53.5%
	Nickles	28.0%
	Noble	16.6%
	Other	1.9%

Osage	Zink	39.6%
	Nickles	31.8%
	Noble	26.8%
	Other	1.8%

Ottawa	Zink	29.6%
	Nickles	39.1%
	Noble	25.8%
	Other	5.4%

Pawnee	Zink	50.7%
	Nickles	24.1%
	Noble	23.9%
	Other	1.3%

Payne	Zink	32.9%
	Nickles	39.3%
	Noble	26.0%
	Other	1.8%

Pittsburg	Zink	24.9%
	Nickles	51.5%
	Noble	19.5%
	Other	4.1%

Pontotoc	Zink	34.2%
	Nickles	36.7%
	Noble	26.1%
	Other	3.1%

Pottawatomie	Zink	27.6%
	Nickles	31.6%
	Noble	38.0%
	Other	2.8%

Pushmataha	Zink	48.7%
	Nickles	19.2%
	Noble	21.8%
	Other	10.3%

Roger Mills	Zink	24.0%
	Nickles	48.0%
	Noble	24.0%
	Other	4.0%

Rogers	Zink	31.6%
	Nickles	32.6%
	Noble	33.0%
	Other	2.8%

Seminole	Zink	35.1%
	Nickles	26.5%
	Noble	36.2%
	Other	2.3%

Sequoyah	Zink	42.2%
	Nickles	26.3%
	Noble	25.0%
	Other	6.5%

Stephens	Zink	18.9%
	Nickles	46.7%
	Noble	33.2%
	Other	1.3%

Texas	Zink	13.4%
	Nickles	51.7%
	Noble	29.2%
	Other	5.7%

Tillman	Zink	51.5%
	Nickles	31.3%
	Noble	11.1%
	Other	6.1%

Tulsa	Zink	41.2%
	Nickles	29.9%
	Noble	26.5%
	Other	2.3%

Wagoner	Zink	36.1%
	Nickles	33.5%
	Noble	26.8%
	Other	3.6%

Washington	Zink	40.4%
	Nickles	39.4%
	Noble	18.5%
	Other	1.7%

Washita	Zink	32.0%
	Nickles	36.0%
	Noble	28.4%
	Other	3.6%

Woods	Zink	19.1%
	Nickles	58.2%
	Noble	18.7%
	Other	4.1%

Woodward	Zink	33.9%
	Nickles	40.0%
	Noble	24.6%
	Other	1.6%

National DataGraph for 1980 - Oklahoma Results for 1980

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved