Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2013-01-01

Map

Map

Anderson	Hance	9.2%
	Williams	43.0%
	Luce	4.5%
	Other	43.4%

Andrews	Hance	28.4%
	Williams	69.3%
	Luce	0.4%
	Other	1.9%

Angelina	Hance	23.3%
	Williams	60.7%
	Luce	8.5%
	Other	7.4%

Aransas	Hance	7.8%
	Williams	74.4%
	Luce	13.2%
	Other	4.6%

Archer	Hance	7.6%
	Williams	80.7%
	Luce	5.9%
	Other	5.9%

Armstrong	Hance	24.6%
	Williams	64.0%
	Luce	2.6%
	Other	8.8%

Atascosa	Hance	12.3%
	Williams	80.8%
	Luce	3.5%
	Other	3.5%

Austin	Hance	9.7%
	Williams	70.4%
	Luce	8.4%
	Other	11.5%

Bailey	Hance	49.0%
	Williams	46.9%
	Luce	0.0%
	Other	4.1%

Bandera	Hance	8.6%
	Williams	79.4%
	Luce	6.7%
	Other	5.3%

Bastrop	Hance	13.9%
	Williams	73.1%
	Luce	7.4%
	Other	5.6%

Baylor	Hance	19.6%
	Williams	70.6%
	Luce	9.8%

Bee	Hance	14.0%
	Williams	72.5%
	Luce	8.8%
	Other	4.7%

Bell	Hance	9.9%
	Williams	77.4%
	Luce	7.1%
	Other	5.7%

Bexar	Hance	13.2%
	Williams	66.5%
	Luce	13.1%
	Other	7.2%

Blanco	Hance	8.1%
	Williams	80.7%
	Luce	6.4%
	Other	4.8%

Borden	Hance	32.4%
	Williams	58.8%
	Luce	5.9%
	Other	2.9%

Bosque	Hance	8.3%
	Williams	78.1%
	Luce	4.6%
	Other	9.0%

Bowie	Hance	16.8%
	Williams	66.6%
	Luce	11.3%
	Other	5.3%

Brazoria	Hance	11.4%
	Williams	68.8%
	Luce	7.3%
	Other	12.6%

Brazos	Hance	17.0%
	Williams	63.5%
	Luce	5.2%
	Other	14.3%

Brewster	Hance	6.9%
	Williams	87.8%
	Luce	3.6%
	Other	1.6%

Briscoe	Hance	41.4%
	Williams	44.8%
	Luce	0.0%
	Other	13.8%

Brooks	Hance	0.0%
	Williams	0.0%
	Luce	0.0%

Brown	Hance	15.0%
	Williams	75.5%
	Luce	4.6%
	Other	4.9%

Burleson	Hance	12.2%
	Williams	80.0%
	Luce	1.7%
	Other	6.1%

Burnet	Hance	9.0%
	Williams	77.6%
	Luce	6.8%
	Other	6.6%

Caldwell	Hance	13.9%
	Williams	75.7%
	Luce	4.8%
	Other	5.6%

Calhoun	Hance	19.5%
	Williams	68.0%
	Luce	3.6%
	Other	8.9%

Callahan	Hance	14.7%
	Williams	78.4%
	Luce	3.3%
	Other	3.7%

Cameron	Hance	16.6%
	Williams	76.3%
	Luce	3.2%
	Other	3.8%

Camp	Hance	15.3%
	Williams	69.4%
	Luce	8.1%
	Other	7.2%

Carson	Hance	28.0%
	Williams	63.4%
	Luce	2.0%
	Other	6.6%

Cass	Hance	20.7%
	Williams	68.5%
	Luce	8.5%
	Other	2.3%

Castro	Hance	68.8%
	Williams	28.5%
	Luce	0.5%
	Other	2.1%

Chambers	Hance	18.2%
	Williams	66.4%
	Luce	6.3%
	Other	9.2%

Cherokee	Hance	13.7%
	Williams	75.8%
	Luce	6.5%
	Other	4.0%

Childress	Hance	28.1%
	Williams	65.7%
	Luce	0.0%
	Other	6.2%

Clay	Hance	17.5%
	Williams	72.8%
	Luce	5.8%
	Other	3.9%

Cochran	Hance	50.0%
	Williams	47.5%
	Luce	1.3%
	Other	1.3%

Coke	Hance	0.0%
	Williams	0.0%
	Luce	0.0%

Coleman	Hance	8.3%
	Williams	80.3%
	Luce	4.7%
	Other	6.7%

Collin	Hance	15.2%
	Williams	50.0%
	Luce	22.5%
	Other	12.3%

Collingsworth	Hance	54.9%
	Williams	38.5%
	Luce	3.3%
	Other	3.3%

Colorado	Hance	8.5%
	Williams	77.5%
	Luce	7.0%
	Other	7.0%

Comal	Hance	14.4%
	Williams	70.8%
	Luce	9.2%
	Other	5.7%

Comanche	Hance	7.2%
	Williams	77.0%
	Luce	9.8%
	Other	6.0%

Concho	Hance	19.0%
	Williams	77.8%
	Luce	0.0%
	Other	3.2%

Cooke	Hance	13.1%
	Williams	68.5%
	Luce	11.9%
	Other	6.5%

Coryell	Hance	8.8%
	Williams	77.8%
	Luce	5.9%
	Other	7.6%

Cottle	Hance	0.0%
	Williams	0.0%
	Luce	0.0%

Crane	Hance	20.0%
	Williams	78.3%
	Luce	0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Crockett	Hance	0.0%
	Williams	0.0%
	Luce	0.0%

Crosby	Hance	42.9%
	Williams	50.2%
	Luce	3.9%
	Other	3.0%

Culberson	Hance	10.0%
	Williams	75.0%
	Luce	10.0%
	Other	5.0%

Dallam	Hance	23.9%
	Williams	66.3%
	Luce	2.2%
	Other	7.6%

Dallas	Hance	15.2%
	Williams	46.0%
	Luce	27.7%
	Other	11.1%

Dawson	Hance	32.4%
	Williams	62.8%
	Luce	1.5%
	Other	3.4%

Deaf Smith	Hance	46.3%
	Williams	46.1%
	Luce	2.5%
	Other	5.1%

Delta	Hance	7.7%
	Williams	80.8%
	Luce	11.5%

Denton	Hance	16.0%
	Williams	56.5%
	Luce	16.1%
	Other	11.3%

DeWitt	Hance	12.5%
	Williams	80.1%
	Luce	4.0%
	Other	3.4%

Dickens	Hance	0.0%
	Williams	0.0%
	Luce	0.0%

Dimmit	Hance	10.5%
	Williams	81.6%
	Luce	5.3%
	Other	2.6%

Donley	Hance	21.2%
	Williams	58.7%
	Luce	5.6%
	Other	14.5%

Duval	Hance	0.0%
	Williams	0.0%
	Luce	0.0%

Eastland	Hance	16.3%
	Williams	74.0%
	Luce	4.5%
	Other	5.2%

Ector	Hance	19.5%
	Williams	75.3%
	Luce	2.2%
	Other	3.0%

Edwards	Hance	16.0%
	Williams	77.9%
	Luce	2.3%
	Other	3.8%

Ellis	Hance	13.0%
	Williams	65.8%
	Luce	12.7%
	Other	8.6%

El Paso	Hance	11.7%
	Williams	80.9%
	Luce	1.9%
	Other	5.5%

Erath	Hance	11.2%
	Williams	75.7%
	Luce	5.7%
	Other	7.4%

Falls	Hance	9.6%
	Williams	80.2%
	Luce	5.5%
	Other	4.7%

Fannin	Hance	11.6%
	Williams	69.4%
	Luce	11.9%
	Other	7.1%

Fayette	Hance	10.5%
	Williams	79.3%
	Luce	4.3%
	Other	6.0%

Fisher	Hance	30.0%
	Williams	70.0%
	Luce	0.0%

Floyd	Hance	38.9%
	Williams	59.3%
	Luce	0.9%
	Other	0.9%

Foard	Hance	37.5%
	Williams	62.5%
	Luce	0.0%

Fort Bend	Hance	13.2%
	Williams	62.6%
	Luce	9.7%
	Other	14.5%

Franklin	Hance	5.0%
	Williams	84.5%
	Luce	8.5%
	Other	2.0%

Freestone	Hance	10.4%
	Williams	74.8%
	Luce	5.9%
	Other	9.0%

Frio	Hance	5.1%
	Williams	84.6%
	Luce	5.1%
	Other	5.1%

Gaines	Hance	35.2%
	Williams	62.7%
	Luce	0.6%
	Other	1.5%

Galveston	Hance	13.9%
	Williams	65.7%
	Luce	7.9%
	Other	12.4%

Garza	Hance	35.9%
	Williams	64.1%
	Luce	0.0%

Gillespie	Hance	11.5%
	Williams	73.2%
	Luce	10.3%
	Other	5.1%

Glasscock	Hance	6.9%
	Williams	87.5%
	Luce	4.2%
	Other	1.4%

Goliad	Hance	9.1%
	Williams	82.6%
	Luce	2.5%
	Other	5.8%

Gonzales	Hance	5.5%
	Williams	82.9%
	Luce	7.5%
	Other	4.1%

Gray	Hance	17.7%
	Williams	71.4%
	Luce	4.4%
	Other	6.5%

Grayson	Hance	13.2%
	Williams	66.5%
	Luce	14.1%
	Other	6.3%

Gregg	Hance	12.4%
	Williams	65.2%
	Luce	16.4%
	Other	5.9%

Grimes	Hance	12.9%
	Williams	73.0%
	Luce	7.1%
	Other	7.1%

Guadalupe	Hance	10.6%
	Williams	76.0%
	Luce	8.1%
	Other	5.3%

Hale	Hance	51.9%
	Williams	45.2%
	Luce	0.9%
	Other	2.0%

Hall	Hance	0.0%
	Williams	0.0%
	Luce	0.0%

Hamilton	Hance	9.1%
	Williams	79.4%
	Luce	6.3%
	Other	5.1%

Hansford	Hance	25.0%
	Williams	69.2%
	Luce	3.1%
	Other	2.7%

Hardeman	Hance	14.3%
	Williams	77.8%
	Luce	6.3%
	Other	1.6%

Hardin	Hance	25.3%
	Williams	62.4%
	Luce	6.5%
	Other	5.7%

Harris	Hance	12.7%
	Williams	56.3%
	Luce	13.0%
	Other	18.0%

Harrison	Hance	35.0%
	Williams	54.4%
	Luce	6.6%
	Other	4.0%

Hartley	Hance	25.9%
	Williams	68.5%
	Luce	1.6%
	Other	4.1%

Haskell	Hance	13.3%
	Williams	78.0%
	Luce	5.7%
	Other	3.0%

Hays	Hance	11.8%
	Williams	67.9%
	Luce	11.0%
	Other	9.4%

Hemphill	Hance	21.2%
	Williams	70.2%
	Luce	2.5%
	Other	6.1%

Henderson	Hance	9.1%
	Williams	72.5%
	Luce	11.5%
	Other	6.9%

Hidalgo	Hance	14.6%
	Williams	73.3%
	Luce	2.9%
	Other	9.2%

Hill	Hance	12.4%
	Williams	72.8%
	Luce	7.5%
	Other	7.3%

Hockley	Hance	36.6%
	Williams	62.1%
	Luce	0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Hood	Hance	11.9%
	Williams	67.9%
	Luce	10.8%
	Other	9.5%

Hopkins	Hance	15.6%
	Williams	70.5%
	Luce	7.1%
	Other	6.8%

Houston	Hance	20.4%
	Williams	67.5%
	Luce	9.4%
	Other	2.7%

Howard	Hance	10.1%
	Williams	83.0%
	Luce	2.8%
	Other	4.0%

Hudspeth	Hance	15.4%
	Williams	76.9%
	Luce	0.0%
	Other	7.7%

Hunt	Hance	13.2%
	Williams	64.6%
	Luce	12.6%
	Other	9.6%

Hutchinson	Hance	20.5%
	Williams	67.5%
	Luce	3.9%
	Other	8.0%

Irion	Hance	9.4%
	Williams	75.0%
	Luce	12.5%
	Other	3.1%

Jack	Hance	12.4%
	Williams	74.4%
	Luce	3.3%
	Other	9.9%

Jackson	Hance	22.5%
	Williams	62.3%
	Luce	5.1%
	Other	10.1%

Jasper	Hance	16.1%
	Williams	70.8%
	Luce	7.2%
	Other	5.9%

Jeff Davis	Hance	5.7%
	Williams	91.4%
	Luce	1.4%
	Other	1.4%

Jefferson	Hance	21.0%
	Williams	54.6%
	Luce	11.5%
	Other	12.9%

Jim Hogg	Hance	4.2%
	Williams	91.7%
	Luce	4.2%

Jim Wells	Hance	10.4%
	Williams	80.7%
	Luce	6.6%
	Other	2.3%

Johnson	Hance	15.7%
	Williams	68.1%
	Luce	9.0%
	Other	7.1%

Jones	Hance	17.5%
	Williams	75.8%
	Luce	5.4%
	Other	1.4%

Karnes	Hance	6.6%
	Williams	80.2%
	Luce	4.1%
	Other	9.1%

Kaufman	Hance	13.9%
	Williams	66.2%
	Luce	11.2%
	Other	8.7%

Kendall	Hance	10.5%
	Williams	75.6%
	Luce	7.6%
	Other	6.3%

Kenedy	Hance	16.7%
	Williams	50.0%
	Luce	33.3%

Kent	Hance	27.3%
	Williams	72.7%
	Luce	0.0%

Kerr	Hance	13.8%
	Williams	72.0%
	Luce	9.5%
	Other	4.6%

Kimble	Hance	9.0%
	Williams	77.8%
	Luce	6.8%
	Other	6.3%

King	Hance	0.0%
	Williams	0.0%
	Luce	0.0%

Kinney	Hance	22.0%
	Williams	64.4%
	Luce	5.1%
	Other	8.5%

Kleberg	Hance	10.0%
	Williams	79.7%
	Luce	4.7%
	Other	5.6%

Knox	Hance	25.0%
	Williams	72.0%
	Luce	3.0%

Lamar	Hance	13.3%
	Williams	60.8%
	Luce	16.2%
	Other	9.7%

Lamb	Hance	49.3%
	Williams	49.6%
	Luce	0.3%
	Other	0.8%

Lampasas	Hance	7.3%
	Williams	80.1%
	Luce	5.8%
	Other	6.7%

La Salle	Hance	20.0%
	Williams	40.0%
	Luce	40.0%

Lavaca	Hance	13.6%
	Williams	77.1%
	Luce	5.2%
	Other	4.1%

Lee	Hance	9.3%
	Williams	81.6%
	Luce	4.9%
	Other	4.2%

Leon	Hance	10.8%
	Williams	75.4%
	Luce	6.9%
	Other	6.9%

Liberty	Hance	26.2%
	Williams	64.3%
	Luce	4.3%
	Other	5.2%

Limestone	Hance	12.4%
	Williams	72.9%
	Luce	8.7%
	Other	6.0%

Lipscomb	Hance	45.2%
	Williams	48.0%
	Luce	2.8%
	Other	4.0%

Live Oak	Hance	15.4%
	Williams	77.6%
	Luce	3.5%
	Other	3.5%

Llano	Hance	8.3%
	Williams	73.7%
	Luce	10.2%
	Other	7.8%

Loving	Hance	5.0%
	Williams	90.0%
	Luce	0.0%
	Other	5.0%

Lubbock	Hance	49.2%
	Williams	47.0%
	Luce	1.3%
	Other	2.5%

Lynn	Hance	37.0%
	Williams	60.5%
	Luce	0.0%
	Other	2.5%

McCulloch	Hance	4.3%
	Williams	84.8%
	Luce	3.9%
	Other	7.1%

McLennan	Hance	12.9%
	Williams	70.2%
	Luce	10.1%
	Other	6.8%

McMullen	Hance	0.0%
	Williams	0.0%
	Luce	0.0%

Madison	Hance	20.7%
	Williams	72.5%
	Luce	2.9%
	Other	4.0%

Marion	Hance	13.0%
	Williams	65.2%
	Luce	17.4%
	Other	4.3%

Martin	Hance	18.2%
	Williams	77.8%
	Luce	0.0%
	Other	4.0%

Mason	Hance	9.1%
	Williams	81.8%
	Luce	3.7%
	Other	5.3%

Matagorda	Hance	14.9%
	Williams	69.3%
	Luce	4.7%
	Other	11.2%

Maverick	Hance	23.6%
	Williams	72.7%
	Luce	1.8%
	Other	1.8%

Medina	Hance	8.3%
	Williams	83.8%
	Luce	4.6%
	Other	3.3%

Menard	Hance	18.0%
	Williams	62.3%
	Luce	6.6%
	Other	13.1%

Midland	Hance	12.7%
	Williams	79.0%
	Luce	4.1%
	Other	4.2%

Milam	Hance	11.8%
	Williams	76.3%
	Luce	4.6%
	Other	7.4%

Mills	Hance	6.3%
	Williams	84.7%
	Luce	5.6%
	Other	3.5%

Mitchell	Hance	23.6%
	Williams	70.8%
	Luce	4.5%
	Other	1.1%

Montague	Hance	13.8%
	Williams	74.9%
	Luce	8.4%
	Other	3.0%

Montgomery	Hance	14.3%
	Williams	65.0%
	Luce	8.9%
	Other	11.8%

Moore	Hance	21.1%
	Williams	69.3%
	Luce	3.6%
	Other	6.0%

Morris	Hance	18.7%
	Williams	63.3%
	Luce	8.7%
	Other	9.3%

Motley	Hance	27.1%
	Williams	71.2%
	Luce	0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Nacogdoches	Hance	20.9%
	Williams	55.2%
	Luce	10.7%
	Other	13.2%

Navarro	Hance	13.2%
	Williams	70.6%
	Luce	9.4%
	Other	6.8%

Newton	Hance	14.4%
	Williams	73.2%
	Luce	8.2%
	Other	4.1%

Nolan	Hance	15.1%
	Williams	73.9%
	Luce	8.3%
	Other	2.8%

Nueces	Hance	13.1%
	Williams	71.4%
	Luce	8.8%
	Other	6.8%

Ochiltree	Hance	24.2%
	Williams	70.0%
	Luce	1.7%
	Other	4.1%

Oldham	Hance	29.0%
	Williams	64.5%
	Luce	3.2%
	Other	3.2%

Orange	Hance	22.9%
	Williams	63.2%
	Luce	6.0%
	Other	7.9%

Palo Pinto	Hance	13.2%
	Williams	68.1%
	Luce	6.6%
	Other	12.1%

Panola	Hance	12.1%
	Williams	73.6%
	Luce	6.6%
	Other	7.7%

Parker	Hance	14.4%
	Williams	70.8%
	Luce	7.6%
	Other	7.1%

Parmer	Hance	42.4%
	Williams	51.6%
	Luce	0.5%
	Other	5.4%

Pecos	Hance	11.7%
	Williams	85.2%
	Luce	1.5%
	Other	1.6%

Polk	Hance	25.5%
	Williams	61.1%
	Luce	5.8%
	Other	7.6%

Potter	Hance	25.9%
	Williams	60.5%
	Luce	4.5%
	Other	9.1%

Presidio	Hance	7.4%
	Williams	81.5%
	Luce	1.9%
	Other	9.3%

Rains	Hance	14.3%
	Williams	61.9%
	Luce	12.4%
	Other	11.4%

Randall	Hance	25.9%
	Williams	58.8%
	Luce	4.7%
	Other	10.6%

Reagan	Hance	12.5%
	Williams	85.4%
	Luce	1.7%
	Other	0.3%

Real	Hance	5.1%
	Williams	87.2%
	Luce	5.1%
	Other	2.6%

Red River	Hance	20.7%
	Williams	72.0%
	Luce	3.7%
	Other	3.7%

Reeves	Hance	0.0%
	Williams	0.0%
	Luce	0.0%

Refugio	Hance	17.2%
	Williams	77.6%
	Luce	3.4%
	Other	1.7%

Roberts	Hance	16.8%
	Williams	69.2%
	Luce	2.8%
	Other	11.2%

Robertson	Hance	10.5%
	Williams	80.9%
	Luce	2.5%
	Other	6.2%

Rockwall	Hance	16.7%
	Williams	58.3%
	Luce	13.7%
	Other	11.3%

Runnels	Hance	8.4%
	Williams	82.8%
	Luce	5.8%
	Other	2.9%

Rusk	Hance	18.2%
	Williams	71.3%
	Luce	6.1%
	Other	4.4%

Sabine	Hance	11.4%
	Williams	74.2%
	Luce	3.0%
	Other	11.4%

San Augustine	Hance	19.0%
	Williams	59.5%
	Luce	16.7%
	Other	4.8%

San Jacinto	Hance	11.8%
	Williams	76.1%
	Luce	5.4%
	Other	6.8%

San Patricio	Hance	11.9%
	Williams	74.0%
	Luce	6.0%
	Other	8.0%

San Saba	Hance	2.8%
	Williams	92.5%
	Luce	2.8%
	Other	2.0%

Schleicher	Hance	12.5%
	Williams	77.1%
	Luce	6.3%
	Other	4.2%

Scurry	Hance	18.9%
	Williams	71.1%
	Luce	3.0%
	Other	7.0%

Shackelford	Hance	16.2%
	Williams	70.1%
	Luce	6.0%
	Other	7.7%

Shelby	Hance	0.0%
	Williams	0.0%
	Luce	0.0%

Sherman	Hance	22.8%
	Williams	72.8%
	Luce	1.5%
	Other	2.9%

Smith	Hance	11.9%
	Williams	68.4%
	Luce	9.3%
	Other	10.4%

Somervell	Hance	29.0%
	Williams	58.1%
	Luce	2.2%
	Other	10.8%

Starr	Hance	31.1%
	Williams	64.4%
	Luce	0.0%
	Other	4.4%

Stephens	Hance	17.1%
	Williams	67.9%
	Luce	12.9%
	Other	2.1%

Sterling	Hance	13.9%
	Williams	81.7%
	Luce	2.6%
	Other	1.7%

Stonewall	Hance	0.0%
	Williams	91.7%
	Luce	0.0%
	Other	8.3%

Sutton	Hance	4.3%
	Williams	87.0%
	Luce	6.8%
	Other	1.9%

Swisher	Hance	37.1%
	Williams	55.1%
	Luce	4.5%
	Other	3.4%

Tarrant	Hance	17.2%
	Williams	57.4%
	Luce	15.2%
	Other	10.2%

Taylor	Hance	18.4%
	Williams	65.6%
	Luce	11.6%
	Other	4.4%

Terrell	Hance	0.0%
	Williams	0.0%
	Luce	0.0%

Terry	Hance	41.7%
	Williams	54.7%
	Luce	2.0%
	Other	1.6%

Throckmorton	Hance	0.0%
	Williams	0.0%
	Luce	0.0%

Titus	Hance	13.4%
	Williams	74.2%
	Luce	7.8%
	Other	4.6%

Tom Green	Hance	11.3%
	Williams	75.9%
	Luce	7.5%
	Other	5.3%

Travis	Hance	11.4%
	Williams	60.6%
	Luce	19.1%
	Other	8.9%

Trinity	Hance	11.6%
	Williams	77.3%
	Luce	6.1%
	Other	5.0%

Tyler	Hance	11.3%
	Williams	75.5%
	Luce	9.4%
	Other	3.8%

Upshur	Hance	14.3%
	Williams	74.2%
	Luce	7.3%
	Other	4.1%

Upton	Hance	9.4%
	Williams	88.9%
	Luce	0.9%
	Other	0.9%

Uvalde	Hance	15.9%
	Williams	75.8%
	Luce	3.7%
	Other	4.6%

Val Verde	Hance	9.8%
	Williams	80.2%
	Luce	6.1%
	Other	4.0%

Van Zandt	Hance	8.9%
	Williams	75.2%
	Luce	8.1%
	Other	7.9%

Victoria	Hance	16.8%
	Williams	69.9%
	Luce	4.1%
	Other	9.2%

Walker	Hance	13.5%
	Williams	66.9%
	Luce	10.0%
	Other	9.6%

Waller	Hance	9.1%
	Williams	73.9%
	Luce	6.3%
	Other	10.6%

Ward	Hance	22.4%
	Williams	73.4%
	Luce	1.1%
	Other	3.0%

Washington	Hance	8.0%
	Williams	74.5%
	Luce	6.6%
	Other	11.0%

Webb	Hance	19.5%
	Williams	69.2%
	Luce	4.1%
	Other	7.3%

Wharton	Hance	12.3%
	Williams	72.4%
	Luce	4.9%
	Other	10.4%

Wheeler	Hance	35.0%
	Williams	57.2%
	Luce	1.9%
	Other	5.8%

Wichita	Hance	16.0%
	Williams	69.5%
	Luce	10.7%
	Other	3.9%

Wilbarger	Hance	20.4%
	Williams	68.8%
	Luce	5.4%
	Other	5.4%

Willacy	Hance	10.7%
	Williams	76.7%
	Luce	5.0%
	Other	7.5%

Williamson	Hance	14.2%
	Williams	67.2%
	Luce	10.4%
	Other	8.2%

Wilson	Hance	7.4%
	Williams	86.7%
	Luce	2.7%
	Other	3.2%

Winkler	Hance	20.8%
	Williams	75.4%
	Luce	1.9%
	Other	1.9%

Wise	Hance	11.9%
	Williams	71.7%
	Luce	7.7%
	Other	8.7%

Wood	Hance	12.3%
	Williams	71.5%
	Luce	10.5%
	Other	5.7%

City

Yoakum	Hance	35.2%
	Williams	64.3%
	Luce	0.0%
	Other	0.5%

Young	Hance	16.9%
	Williams	69.0%
	Luce	10.0%
	Other	4.1%

Zapata	Hance	12.4%
	Williams	79.1%
	Luce	0.8%
	Other	7.8%

Zavala	Hance	8.3%
	Williams	91.7%
	Luce	0.0%

National DataGraph for 1990 - Texas Results for 1990

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved