1992 Senatorial General Election Data Graphs - Indiana
Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.
Map

AdamsHogsett32.8%
 
Coats65.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.4%
 


AllenHogsett34.7%
 
Coats63.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.8%
 


BartholomewHogsett34.2%
 
Coats63.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.4%
 


BentonHogsett38.5%
 
Coats59.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.4%
 


BlackfordHogsett41.2%
 
Coats57.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.6%
 


BooneHogsett26.2%
 
Coats72.4%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.4%
 


BrownHogsett36.0%
 
Coats61.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.6%
 


CarrollHogsett41.7%
 
Coats56.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.4%
 


CassHogsett41.8%
 
Coats56.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.7%
 


ClarkHogsett54.9%
 
Coats44.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.2%
 


ClayHogsett40.0%
 
Coats58.4%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.6%
 


ClintonHogsett35.0%
 
Coats62.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.0%
 


CrawfordHogsett53.7%
 
Coats45.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.9%
 


DaviessHogsett36.9%
 
Coats62.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.1%
 


DearbornHogsett40.5%
 
Coats57.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.3%
 


DecaturHogsett34.3%
 
Coats63.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.1%
 


DeKalbHogsett35.3%
 
Coats63.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.5%
 


DelawareHogsett38.7%
 
Coats58.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.6%
 


DuboisHogsett42.2%
 
Coats56.4%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.5%
 


ElkhartHogsett29.7%
 
Coats68.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.5%
 


FayetteHogsett45.0%
 
Coats53.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.5%
 


FloydHogsett51.9%
 
Coats47.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.0%
 


FountainHogsett43.0%
 
Coats54.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.2%
 


FranklinHogsett39.1%
 
Coats58.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.7%
 


FultonHogsett38.7%
 
Coats59.4%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.0%
 


GibsonHogsett51.1%
 
Coats47.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.2%
 


GrantHogsett35.4%
 
Coats63.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.6%
 


GreeneHogsett46.4%
 
Coats51.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.9%
 


HamiltonHogsett18.5%
 
Coats79.3%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.2%
 


HancockHogsett27.7%
 
Coats69.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.5%
 


HarrisonHogsett51.9%
 
Coats46.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.6%
 


HendricksHogsett24.2%
 
Coats73.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.1%
 


HenryHogsett39.9%
 
Coats58.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.0%
 


HowardHogsett39.8%
 
Coats57.3%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.9%
 


HuntingtonHogsett30.8%
 
Coats68.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.1%
 


JacksonHogsett41.1%
 
Coats57.4%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.5%
 


JasperHogsett37.5%
 
Coats61.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.4%
 


JayHogsett37.0%
 
Coats61.3%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.7%
 


JeffersonHogsett49.9%
 
Coats48.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.0%
 


JenningsHogsett42.0%
 
Coats55.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.4%
 


JohnsonHogsett26.0%
 
Coats71.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.5%
 


KnoxHogsett44.2%
 
Coats53.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.8%
 


KosciuskoHogsett26.6%
 
Coats71.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.5%
 


LaGrangeHogsett31.3%
 
Coats66.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.8%
 


LakeHogsett60.8%
 
Coats37.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.0%
 


LaPorteHogsett48.5%
 
Coats49.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.0%
 


LawrenceHogsett41.2%
 
Coats57.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.7%
 


MadisonHogsett43.3%
 
Coats54.3%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.4%
 


MarionHogsett39.1%
 
Coats59.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.0%
 


MarshallHogsett33.9%
 
Coats65.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.0%
 


MartinHogsett47.2%
 
Coats51.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.0%
 


MiamiHogsett40.1%
 
Coats58.4%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.5%
 


MonroeHogsett40.0%
 
Coats56.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other4.0%
 


MontgomeryHogsett27.7%
 
Coats69.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.7%
 


MorganHogsett28.2%
 
Coats69.3%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.5%
 


NewtonHogsett38.0%
 
Coats59.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.5%
 


NobleHogsett34.6%
 
Coats63.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.7%
 


OhioHogsett47.4%
 
Coats50.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.9%
 


OrangeHogsett44.0%
 
Coats54.4%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.7%
 


OwenHogsett38.3%
 
Coats58.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.6%
 


ParkeHogsett41.8%
 
Coats56.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.1%
 


PerryHogsett57.3%
 
Coats41.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.0%
 


PikeHogsett49.0%
 
Coats49.4%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.6%
 


PorterHogsett42.9%
 
Coats55.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.1%
 


PoseyHogsett41.5%
 
Coats56.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.9%
 


PulaskiHogsett42.1%
 
Coats56.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.0%
 


PutnamHogsett32.7%
 
Coats64.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.6%
 


RandolphHogsett37.4%
 
Coats60.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.9%
 


RipleyHogsett38.1%
 
Coats60.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.3%
 


RushHogsett46.7%
 
Coats51.3%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.0%
 


St. JosephHogsett44.7%
 
Coats54.3%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.0%
 


ScottHogsett58.7%
 
Coats40.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.2%
 


ShelbyHogsett33.6%
 
Coats64.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.5%
 


SpencerHogsett49.3%
 
Coats50.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other0.4%
 


StarkeHogsett47.9%
 
Coats50.4%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.7%
 


SteubenHogsett34.6%
 
Coats64.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.4%
 


SullivanHogsett53.1%
 
Coats45.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.7%
 


SwitzerlandHogsett53.4%
 
Coats45.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.0%
 


TippecanoeHogsett36.8%
 
Coats60.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.2%
 


TiptonHogsett33.2%
 
Coats65.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.7%
 


UnionHogsett38.4%
 
Coats59.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.0%
 


VanderburghHogsett43.2%
 
Coats54.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.9%
 


VermillionHogsett55.3%
 
Coats42.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.3%
 


VigoHogsett49.1%
 
Coats48.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.4%
 


WabashHogsett35.7%
 
Coats63.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.3%
 


WarrenHogsett45.6%
 
Coats52.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.1%
 


WarrickHogsett43.1%
 
Coats55.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.8%
 


WashingtonHogsett48.1%
 
Coats50.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.4%
 


WayneHogsett40.9%
 
Coats57.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.0%
 


WellsHogsett32.9%
 
Coats65.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.6%
 


WhiteHogsett38.8%
 
Coats58.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.5%
 


WhitleyHogsett35.3%
 
Coats62.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.4%
 



National DataGraph for 1992 - Indiana Results for 1992

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies


© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved