Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2007-05-16

Map

Map

Adair	Carnahan	67.4%
	Schoemehl	24.0%
	Rogers	3.9%
	Other	4.7%

Andrew	Carnahan	51.2%
	Schoemehl	30.5%
	Rogers	7.8%
	Other	10.5%

Atchison	Carnahan	46.3%
	Schoemehl	14.9%
	Rogers	14.8%
	Other	24.1%

Audrain	Carnahan	60.4%
	Schoemehl	29.4%
	Rogers	4.8%
	Other	5.4%

Barry	Carnahan	69.5%
	Schoemehl	21.1%
	Rogers	4.7%
	Other	4.7%

Barton	Carnahan	71.2%
	Schoemehl	12.0%
	Rogers	8.3%
	Other	8.4%

Bates	Carnahan	62.4%
	Schoemehl	23.7%
	Rogers	5.7%
	Other	8.1%

Benton	Carnahan	61.7%
	Schoemehl	24.4%
	Rogers	5.9%
	Other	8.0%

Bollinger	Carnahan	68.7%
	Schoemehl	19.3%
	Rogers	4.4%
	Other	7.6%

Boone	Carnahan	61.4%
	Schoemehl	30.4%
	Rogers	4.8%
	Other	3.5%

Buchanan	Carnahan	51.6%
	Schoemehl	30.7%
	Rogers	7.5%
	Other	10.2%

Butler	Carnahan	65.5%
	Schoemehl	24.4%
	Rogers	4.0%
	Other	6.2%

Caldwell	Carnahan	50.4%
	Schoemehl	32.5%
	Rogers	6.4%
	Other	10.7%

Callaway	Carnahan	64.0%
	Schoemehl	26.8%
	Rogers	5.0%
	Other	4.1%

Camden	Carnahan	52.0%
	Schoemehl	39.2%
	Rogers	4.2%
	Other	4.6%

Cape Girardeau	Carnahan	63.2%
	Schoemehl	26.4%
	Rogers	3.8%
	Other	6.6%

Carroll	Carnahan	60.4%
	Schoemehl	28.8%
	Rogers	4.1%
	Other	6.7%

Carter	Carnahan	73.5%
	Schoemehl	15.4%
	Rogers	4.0%
	Other	7.1%

Cass	Carnahan	52.2%
	Schoemehl	34.1%
	Rogers	5.8%
	Other	8.0%

Cedar	Carnahan	62.3%
	Schoemehl	28.5%
	Rogers	4.0%
	Other	5.2%

Chariton	Carnahan	61.6%
	Schoemehl	26.2%
	Rogers	6.5%
	Other	5.7%

Christian	Carnahan	46.6%
	Schoemehl	44.5%
	Rogers	4.5%
	Other	4.5%

Clark	Carnahan	63.0%
	Schoemehl	21.0%
	Rogers	6.3%
	Other	9.7%

Clay	Carnahan	49.1%
	Schoemehl	38.2%
	Rogers	6.4%
	Other	6.3%

Clinton	Carnahan	49.3%
	Schoemehl	34.7%
	Rogers	7.0%
	Other	9.0%

Cole	Carnahan	65.4%
	Schoemehl	28.0%
	Rogers	3.4%
	Other	3.2%

Cooper	Carnahan	63.9%
	Schoemehl	25.9%
	Rogers	5.6%
	Other	4.6%

Crawford	Carnahan	56.3%
	Schoemehl	34.5%
	Rogers	4.5%
	Other	4.7%

Dade	Carnahan	62.9%
	Schoemehl	23.3%
	Rogers	6.8%
	Other	7.0%

Dallas	Carnahan	58.7%
	Schoemehl	30.9%
	Rogers	4.6%
	Other	5.7%

Daviess	Carnahan	55.1%
	Schoemehl	26.7%
	Rogers	8.4%
	Other	9.7%

DeKalb	Carnahan	58.2%
	Schoemehl	27.1%
	Rogers	7.1%
	Other	7.6%

Dent	Carnahan	69.9%
	Schoemehl	20.8%
	Rogers	3.8%
	Other	5.5%

Douglas	Carnahan	53.8%
	Schoemehl	35.7%
	Rogers	4.8%
	Other	5.8%

Dunklin	Carnahan	68.3%
	Schoemehl	17.1%
	Rogers	5.2%
	Other	9.3%

Franklin	Carnahan	46.6%
	Schoemehl	41.4%
	Rogers	5.5%
	Other	6.5%

Gasconade	Carnahan	54.0%
	Schoemehl	35.8%
	Rogers	5.7%
	Other	4.4%

Gentry	Carnahan	60.4%
	Schoemehl	21.4%
	Rogers	6.6%
	Other	11.6%

Greene	Carnahan	52.6%
	Schoemehl	39.7%
	Rogers	3.9%
	Other	3.7%

Grundy	Carnahan	56.0%
	Schoemehl	31.5%
	Rogers	4.3%
	Other	8.2%

Harrison	Carnahan	56.7%
	Schoemehl	18.1%
	Rogers	10.9%
	Other	14.3%

Henry	Carnahan	48.9%
	Schoemehl	42.3%
	Rogers	3.1%
	Other	5.7%

Hickory	Carnahan	64.8%
	Schoemehl	26.9%
	Rogers	3.9%
	Other	4.5%

Holt	Carnahan	56.9%
	Schoemehl	21.1%
	Rogers	7.8%
	Other	14.2%

Howard	Carnahan	59.9%
	Schoemehl	30.3%
	Rogers	5.0%
	Other	4.8%

Howell	Carnahan	62.3%
	Schoemehl	27.1%
	Rogers	5.1%
	Other	5.5%

Iron	Carnahan	54.9%
	Schoemehl	32.4%
	Rogers	4.7%
	Other	8.0%

Jackson	Carnahan	57.1%
	Schoemehl	32.1%
	Rogers	5.0%
	Other	5.8%

Jasper	Carnahan	70.9%
	Schoemehl	11.4%
	Rogers	7.2%
	Other	10.4%

Jefferson	Carnahan	44.2%
	Schoemehl	42.4%
	Rogers	5.5%
	Other	7.9%

Johnson	Carnahan	52.0%
	Schoemehl	35.4%
	Rogers	7.3%
	Other	5.3%

Knox	Carnahan	63.3%
	Schoemehl	26.9%
	Rogers	2.9%
	Other	6.9%

Laclede	Carnahan	61.4%
	Schoemehl	29.8%
	Rogers	3.9%
	Other	4.8%

Lafayette	Carnahan	53.9%
	Schoemehl	32.8%
	Rogers	5.5%
	Other	7.7%

Lawrence	Carnahan	57.0%
	Schoemehl	33.8%
	Rogers	3.5%
	Other	5.6%

Lewis	Carnahan	56.6%
	Schoemehl	30.5%
	Rogers	6.1%
	Other	6.8%

Lincoln	Carnahan	51.9%
	Schoemehl	34.8%
	Rogers	6.2%
	Other	7.1%

Linn	Carnahan	58.9%
	Schoemehl	24.5%
	Rogers	6.7%
	Other	9.9%

Livingston	Carnahan	58.9%
	Schoemehl	27.2%
	Rogers	5.7%
	Other	8.2%

McDonald	Carnahan	70.8%
	Schoemehl	9.5%
	Rogers	8.0%
	Other	11.7%

Macon	Carnahan	61.2%
	Schoemehl	28.4%
	Rogers	4.9%
	Other	5.4%

Madison	Carnahan	60.9%
	Schoemehl	26.8%
	Rogers	5.7%
	Other	6.6%

Maries	Carnahan	73.6%
	Schoemehl	17.9%
	Rogers	4.1%
	Other	4.4%

Marion	Carnahan	58.9%
	Schoemehl	28.1%
	Rogers	4.8%
	Other	8.3%

Mercer	Carnahan	68.4%
	Schoemehl	12.4%
	Rogers	7.2%
	Other	12.0%

Miller	Carnahan	61.5%
	Schoemehl	29.5%
	Rogers	3.8%
	Other	5.2%

Mississippi	Carnahan	63.5%
	Schoemehl	20.3%
	Rogers	4.9%
	Other	11.4%

Moniteau	Carnahan	63.0%
	Schoemehl	31.9%
	Rogers	2.4%
	Other	2.7%

Monroe	Carnahan	66.8%
	Schoemehl	22.3%
	Rogers	4.9%
	Other	6.0%

Montgomery	Carnahan	53.9%
	Schoemehl	29.0%
	Rogers	11.1%
	Other	6.0%

Morgan	Carnahan	61.5%
	Schoemehl	28.0%
	Rogers	4.4%
	Other	6.1%

New Madrid	Carnahan	56.5%
	Schoemehl	30.3%
	Rogers	4.4%
	Other	8.8%

Newton	Carnahan	65.1%
	Schoemehl	15.8%
	Rogers	8.9%
	Other	10.1%

Nodaway	Carnahan	58.0%
	Schoemehl	19.2%
	Rogers	9.0%
	Other	13.7%

Oregon	Carnahan	51.8%
	Schoemehl	34.7%
	Rogers	4.9%
	Other	8.5%

Osage	Carnahan	63.4%
	Schoemehl	29.4%
	Rogers	4.2%
	Other	3.1%

Ozark	Carnahan	54.3%
	Schoemehl	32.5%
	Rogers	5.9%
	Other	7.3%

Pemiscot	Carnahan	61.1%
	Schoemehl	15.5%
	Rogers	10.0%
	Other	13.5%

Perry	Carnahan	52.2%
	Schoemehl	34.6%
	Rogers	5.5%
	Other	7.8%

Pettis	Carnahan	63.0%
	Schoemehl	26.1%
	Rogers	4.2%
	Other	6.7%

Phelps	Carnahan	75.6%
	Schoemehl	17.8%
	Rogers	3.7%
	Other	2.9%

Pike	Carnahan	56.1%
	Schoemehl	33.3%
	Rogers	4.7%
	Other	5.9%

Platte	Carnahan	47.9%
	Schoemehl	40.8%
	Rogers	5.0%
	Other	6.3%

Polk	Carnahan	60.1%
	Schoemehl	31.8%
	Rogers	3.8%
	Other	4.3%

Pulaski	Carnahan	70.4%
	Schoemehl	18.9%
	Rogers	5.2%
	Other	5.5%

Putnam	Carnahan	69.0%
	Schoemehl	10.7%
	Rogers	8.9%
	Other	11.3%

Ralls	Carnahan	58.1%
	Schoemehl	29.9%
	Rogers	5.0%
	Other	7.1%

Randolph	Carnahan	61.1%
	Schoemehl	28.9%
	Rogers	4.7%
	Other	5.3%

Ray	Carnahan	54.0%
	Schoemehl	30.7%
	Rogers	7.2%
	Other	8.1%

Reynolds	Carnahan	67.1%
	Schoemehl	18.9%
	Rogers	4.3%
	Other	9.7%

Ripley	Carnahan	70.2%
	Schoemehl	14.5%
	Rogers	5.6%
	Other	9.6%

St. Charles	Carnahan	44.3%
	Schoemehl	43.1%
	Rogers	6.2%
	Other	6.3%

St. Clair	Carnahan	64.3%
	Schoemehl	26.1%
	Rogers	4.9%
	Other	4.6%

Ste. Genevieve	Carnahan	39.8%
	Schoemehl	43.1%
	Rogers	12.0%
	Other	5.1%

St. Francois	Carnahan	51.2%
	Schoemehl	37.6%
	Rogers	5.2%
	Other	6.1%

St. Louis	Carnahan	50.4%
	Schoemehl	41.1%
	Rogers	4.2%
	Other	4.3%

Saline	Carnahan	66.0%
	Schoemehl	22.9%
	Rogers	5.0%
	Other	6.1%

Schuyler	Carnahan	65.5%
	Schoemehl	18.8%
	Rogers	8.3%
	Other	7.4%

Scotland	Carnahan	55.6%
	Schoemehl	24.2%
	Rogers	9.4%
	Other	10.8%

Scott	Carnahan	60.6%
	Schoemehl	25.9%
	Rogers	4.9%
	Other	8.6%

Shannon	Carnahan	64.6%
	Schoemehl	25.4%
	Rogers	3.7%
	Other	6.3%

Shelby	Carnahan	65.7%
	Schoemehl	26.9%
	Rogers	3.5%
	Other	3.9%

Stoddard	Carnahan	73.8%
	Schoemehl	15.9%
	Rogers	3.8%
	Other	6.5%

Stone	Carnahan	56.5%
	Schoemehl	34.3%
	Rogers	4.6%
	Other	4.5%

Sullivan	Carnahan	66.1%
	Schoemehl	18.8%
	Rogers	6.7%
	Other	8.4%

Taney	Carnahan	59.6%
	Schoemehl	30.7%
	Rogers	4.8%
	Other	4.9%

Texas	Carnahan	67.0%
	Schoemehl	24.5%
	Rogers	3.4%
	Other	5.0%

Vernon	Carnahan	68.5%
	Schoemehl	14.7%
	Rogers	7.0%
	Other	9.8%

Warren	Carnahan	41.1%
	Schoemehl	39.9%
	Rogers	13.2%
	Other	5.7%

Washington	Carnahan	51.1%
	Schoemehl	34.4%
	Rogers	6.1%
	Other	8.3%

Wayne	Carnahan	75.4%
	Schoemehl	16.5%
	Rogers	3.2%
	Other	4.9%

Webster	Carnahan	67.8%
	Schoemehl	25.1%
	Rogers	2.9%
	Other	4.2%

Worth	Carnahan	55.7%
	Schoemehl	13.2%
	Rogers	12.3%
	Other	18.8%

Wright	Carnahan	61.4%
	Schoemehl	28.3%
	Rogers	3.8%
	Other	6.4%

City

St. Louis	Carnahan	53.8%
	Schoemehl	38.4%
	Rogers	3.4%
	Other	4.4%

National DataGraph for 1992 - Missouri Results for 1992

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved