2000 Presidential General Election Data Graphs - North Carolina
Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.
Map

AlamanceGore37.1%
 
Bush62.2%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.7%
 


AlexanderGore30.9%
 
Bush68.5%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.6%
 


AlleghanyGore39.8%
 
Bush58.7%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other1.6%
 


AnsonGore60.0%
 
Bush39.6%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.4%
 


AsheGore38.9%
 
Bush60.4%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.8%
 


AveryGore25.2%
 
Bush74.0%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.8%
 


BeaufortGore38.3%
 
Bush60.8%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.9%
 


BertieGore64.9%
 
Bush34.7%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.4%
 


BladenGore54.0%
 
Bush45.6%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.4%
 


BrunswickGore45.5%
 
Bush53.5%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other1.0%
 


BuncombeGore45.1%
 
Bush53.9%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other1.0%
 


BurkeGore38.9%
 
Bush60.2%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.9%
 


CabarrusGore33.0%
 
Bush66.2%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.8%
 


CaldwellGore32.9%
 
Bush66.4%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.7%
 


CamdenGore41.9%
 
Bush57.5%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.6%
 


CarteretGore33.4%
 
Bush65.7%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.9%
 


CaswellGore48.6%
 
Bush50.7%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.7%
 


CatawbaGore32.0%
 
Bush67.4%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.7%
 


ChathamGore50.0%
 
Bush49.0%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other1.1%
 


CherokeeGore33.5%
 
Bush65.2%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other1.3%
 


ChowanGore49.7%
 
Bush49.4%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.9%
 


ClayGore35.3%
 
Bush62.7%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other1.9%
 


ClevelandGore41.1%
 
Bush58.2%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.7%
 


ColumbusGore54.2%
 
Bush45.3%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.5%
 


CravenGore38.2%
 
Bush60.9%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.9%
 


CumberlandGore50.1%
 
Bush49.4%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.5%
 


CurrituckGore38.5%
 
Bush60.8%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.7%
 


DareGore43.0%
 
Bush56.2%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.9%
 


DavidsonGore31.1%
 
Bush68.0%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.9%
 


DavieGore26.1%
 
Bush72.8%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other1.2%
 


DuplinGore45.0%
 
Bush54.5%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.5%
 


DurhamGore63.7%
 
Bush35.6%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.6%
 


EdgecombeGore62.2%
 
Bush37.6%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.3%
 


ForsythGore43.4%
 
Bush56.0%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.6%
 


FranklinGore46.4%
 
Bush53.0%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.6%
 


GastonGore32.6%
 
Bush66.7%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.8%
 


GatesGore56.4%
 
Bush42.9%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.6%
 


GrahamGore29.9%
 
Bush68.6%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other1.5%
 


GranvilleGore50.9%
 
Bush48.5%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.6%
 


GreeneGore42.2%
 
Bush57.1%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.7%
 


GuilfordGore48.6%
 
Bush50.8%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.7%
 


HalifaxGore60.2%
 
Bush39.5%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.3%
 


HarnettGore37.9%
 
Bush61.1%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other1.0%
 


HaywoodGore44.0%
 
Bush54.4%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other1.6%
 


HendersonGore32.5%
 
Bush66.5%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.9%
 


HertfordGore69.4%
 
Bush30.2%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.4%
 


HokeGore58.5%
 
Bush40.1%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other1.5%
 


HydeGore48.6%
 
Bush50.6%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.8%
 


IredellGore33.9%
 
Bush65.5%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.7%
 


JacksonGore47.2%
 
Bush51.5%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other1.3%
 


JohnstonGore33.3%
 
Bush66.1%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.6%
 


JonesGore46.0%
 
Bush53.3%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.7%
 


LeeGore41.7%
 
Bush57.8%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.6%
 


LenoirGore45.0%
 
Bush54.4%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.6%
 


LincolnGore34.3%
 
Bush65.0%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.7%
 


McDowellGore33.9%
 
Bush65.0%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other1.1%
 


MaconGore35.4%
 
Bush63.5%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other1.1%
 


MadisonGore42.1%
 
Bush56.2%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other1.7%
 


MartinGore52.6%
 
Bush47.2%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.2%
 


MecklenburgGore48.2%
 
Bush51.0%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.8%
 


MitchellGore23.3%
 
Bush75.5%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other1.2%
 


MontgomeryGore44.3%
 
Bush55.1%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.5%
 


MooreGore35.9%
 
Bush63.5%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.6%
 


NashGore40.6%
 
Bush59.0%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.5%
 


New HanoverGore44.2%
 
Bush55.0%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.8%
 


NorthamptonGore67.2%
 
Bush32.5%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.2%
 


OnslowGore34.0%
 
Bush65.1%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other1.0%
 


OrangeGore62.7%
 
Bush36.3%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other1.0%
 


PamlicoGore41.7%
 
Bush57.2%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other1.0%
 


PasquotankGore53.9%
 
Bush45.3%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.8%
 


PenderGore45.3%
 
Bush54.1%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.6%
 


PerquimansGore47.2%
 
Bush51.8%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other1.0%
 


PersonGore42.6%
 
Bush56.8%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.6%
 


PittGore45.7%
 
Bush53.8%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.5%
 


PolkGore37.5%
 
Bush61.1%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other1.4%
 


RandolphGore26.6%
 
Bush72.5%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.9%
 


RichmondGore55.6%
 
Bush43.9%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.5%
 


RobesonGore60.0%
 
Bush39.4%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.6%
 


RockinghamGore40.8%
 
Bush58.3%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.9%
 


RowanGore33.7%
 
Bush65.5%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.7%
 


RutherfordGore35.4%
 
Bush63.3%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other1.2%
 


SampsonGore45.6%
 
Bush54.1%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.3%
 


ScotlandGore59.8%
 
Bush39.8%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.4%
 


StanlyGore31.0%
 
Bush68.1%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.9%
 


StokesGore29.3%
 
Bush70.0%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.7%
 


SurryGore33.2%
 
Bush65.9%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.9%
 


SwainGore48.0%
 
Bush50.9%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other1.1%
 


TransylvaniaGore35.5%
 
Bush63.3%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other1.2%
 


TyrrellGore54.2%
 
Bush45.1%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.7%
 


UnionGore31.6%
 
Bush67.6%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.8%
 


VanceGore55.8%
 
Bush43.8%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.4%
 


WakeGore46.0%
 
Bush53.1%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.8%
 


WarrenGore67.3%
 
Bush32.4%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.3%
 


WashingtonGore55.3%
 
Bush44.4%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.3%
 


WataugaGore42.5%
 
Bush55.7%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other1.7%
 


WayneGore38.4%
 
Bush61.3%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.4%
 


WilkesGore29.7%
 
Bush69.2%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other1.1%
 


WilsonGore45.4%
 
Bush54.2%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.4%
 


YadkinGore22.9%
 
Bush76.3%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.9%
 


YanceyGore42.4%
 
Bush56.7%
 
Nader0.0%
 
Other0.9%
 



National DataGraph for 2000 - North Carolina Results for 2000

Login

Terms of Service - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies


© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved