Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Accomack	Warner	50.3%
	Earley	48.5%
	Other	1.2%

Albemarle	Warner	56.3%
	Earley	42.2%
	Other	1.5%

Alleghany	Warner	59.0%
	Earley	39.9%
	Other	1.1%

Amelia	Warner	46.7%
	Earley	52.7%
	Other	0.6%

Amherst	Warner	50.8%
	Earley	48.8%
	Other	0.4%

Appomattox	Warner	51.3%
	Earley	47.3%
	Other	1.4%

Arlington	Warner	68.3%
	Earley	30.8%
	Other	1.0%

Augusta	Warner	37.1%
	Earley	61.9%
	Other	0.9%

Bath	Warner	51.8%
	Earley	46.4%
	Other	1.8%

Bedford	Warner	41.1%
	Earley	57.8%
	Other	1.1%

Bland	Warner	48.2%
	Earley	51.2%
	Other	0.6%

Botetourt	Warner	43.7%
	Earley	55.4%
	Other	1.0%

Brunswick	Warner	65.3%
	Earley	34.3%
	Other	0.4%

Buchanan	Warner	65.7%
	Earley	33.7%
	Other	0.7%

Buckingham	Warner	59.1%
	Earley	40.1%
	Other	0.8%

Campbell	Warner	45.7%
	Earley	53.1%
	Other	1.2%

Caroline	Warner	60.8%
	Earley	38.5%
	Other	0.6%

Carroll	Warner	42.3%
	Earley	57.2%
	Other	0.5%

Charles City	Warner	73.1%
	Earley	26.4%
	Other	0.5%

Charlotte	Warner	51.4%
	Earley	46.9%
	Other	1.7%

Chesterfield	Warner	41.9%
	Earley	57.3%
	Other	0.8%

Clarke	Warner	49.3%
	Earley	49.7%
	Other	1.0%

Craig	Warner	50.3%
	Earley	48.6%
	Other	1.1%

Culpeper	Warner	42.0%
	Earley	57.1%
	Other	0.8%

Cumberland	Warner	50.0%
	Earley	47.7%
	Other	2.4%

Dickenson	Warner	61.0%
	Earley	38.6%
	Other	0.4%

Dinwiddie	Warner	52.3%
	Earley	46.8%
	Other	0.8%

Essex	Warner	54.2%
	Earley	45.4%
	Other	0.5%

Fairfax	Warner	54.5%
	Earley	44.9%
	Other	0.6%

Fauquier	Warner	42.2%
	Earley	57.2%
	Other	0.6%

Floyd	Warner	46.6%
	Earley	51.9%
	Other	1.5%

Fluvanna	Warner	47.0%
	Earley	51.7%
	Other	1.3%

Franklin	Warner	51.3%
	Earley	47.9%
	Other	0.8%

Frederick	Warner	39.0%
	Earley	60.3%
	Other	0.7%

Giles	Warner	56.5%
	Earley	41.9%
	Other	1.6%

Gloucester	Warner	44.8%
	Earley	54.5%
	Other	0.8%

Goochland	Warner	47.3%
	Earley	51.9%
	Other	0.8%

Grayson	Warner	46.7%
	Earley	52.6%
	Other	0.7%

Greene	Warner	41.7%
	Earley	56.9%
	Other	1.4%

Greensville	Warner	68.6%
	Earley	31.0%
	Other	0.3%

Halifax	Warner	54.8%
	Earley	43.4%
	Other	1.8%

Hanover	Warner	38.2%
	Earley	61.1%
	Other	0.7%

Henrico	Warner	51.4%
	Earley	47.9%
	Other	0.7%

Henry	Warner	61.4%
	Earley	36.9%
	Other	1.7%

Highland	Warner	48.0%
	Earley	51.2%
	Other	0.8%

Isle of Wight	Warner	49.9%
	Earley	49.7%
	Other	0.4%

James City	Warner	49.3%
	Earley	50.2%
	Other	0.5%

King George	Warner	49.2%
	Earley	50.1%
	Other	0.7%

King and Queen	Warner	57.3%
	Earley	42.0%
	Other	0.7%

King William	Warner	49.4%
	Earley	49.9%
	Other	0.7%

Lancaster	Warner	45.7%
	Earley	53.5%
	Other	0.8%

Lee	Warner	53.3%
	Earley	46.2%
	Other	0.5%

Loudoun	Warner	45.8%
	Earley	53.4%
	Other	0.7%

Louisa	Warner	53.7%
	Earley	45.2%
	Other	1.1%

Lunenburg	Warner	54.7%
	Earley	44.7%
	Other	0.6%

Madison	Warner	44.9%
	Earley	53.1%
	Other	1.9%

Mathews	Warner	46.4%
	Earley	52.4%
	Other	1.1%

Mecklenburg	Warner	46.7%
	Earley	51.7%
	Other	1.6%

Middlesex	Warner	47.6%
	Earley	50.4%
	Other	2.0%

Montgomery	Warner	55.7%
	Earley	43.1%
	Other	1.2%

Nelson	Warner	59.4%
	Earley	39.1%
	Other	1.5%

New Kent	Warner	45.6%
	Earley	53.5%
	Other	0.9%

Northampton	Warner	64.2%
	Earley	34.2%
	Other	1.6%

Northumberland	Warner	49.7%
	Earley	49.6%
	Other	0.7%

Nottoway	Warner	57.4%
	Earley	41.6%
	Other	1.0%

Orange	Warner	47.5%
	Earley	51.3%
	Other	1.2%

Page	Warner	42.4%
	Earley	57.2%
	Other	0.4%

Patrick	Warner	48.3%
	Earley	50.6%
	Other	1.0%

Pittsylvania	Warner	42.5%
	Earley	56.0%
	Other	1.6%

Powhatan	Warner	36.8%
	Earley	62.4%
	Other	0.9%

Prince Edward	Warner	58.6%
	Earley	40.1%
	Other	1.3%

Prince George	Warner	45.1%
	Earley	54.2%
	Other	0.7%

Prince William	Warner	46.8%
	Earley	52.4%
	Other	0.9%

Pulaski	Warner	53.0%
	Earley	45.8%
	Other	1.2%

Rappahannock	Warner	48.0%
	Earley	51.2%
	Other	0.8%

Richmond	Warner	49.1%
	Earley	50.1%
	Other	0.8%

Roanoke	Warner	47.0%
	Earley	52.4%
	Other	0.7%

Rockbridge	Warner	50.3%
	Earley	48.9%
	Other	0.8%

Rockingham	Warner	36.0%
	Earley	63.5%
	Other	0.6%

Russell	Warner	60.4%
	Earley	38.9%
	Other	0.7%

Scott	Warner	42.8%
	Earley	56.1%
	Other	1.2%

Shenandoah	Warner	40.2%
	Earley	59.1%
	Other	0.7%

Smyth	Warner	51.4%
	Earley	47.7%
	Other	0.9%

Southampton	Warner	60.2%
	Earley	39.4%
	Other	0.3%

Spotsylvania	Warner	45.8%
	Earley	53.8%
	Other	0.4%

Stafford	Warner	43.2%
	Earley	56.1%
	Other	0.7%

Surry	Warner	65.5%
	Earley	33.9%
	Other	0.6%

Sussex	Warner	61.6%
	Earley	36.3%
	Other	2.1%

Tazewell	Warner	54.3%
	Earley	44.9%
	Other	0.8%

Warren	Warner	44.6%
	Earley	54.2%
	Other	1.3%

Washington	Warner	45.3%
	Earley	53.8%
	Other	0.9%

Westmoreland	Warner	57.6%
	Earley	41.0%
	Other	1.5%

Wise	Warner	58.5%
	Earley	40.5%
	Other	1.0%

Wythe	Warner	48.6%
	Earley	50.7%
	Other	0.7%

York	Warner	45.0%
	Earley	54.3%
	Other	0.6%

City

Alexandria	Warner	68.2%
	Earley	31.1%
	Other	0.7%

Bedford	Warner	56.9%
	Earley	41.2%
	Other	1.9%

Bristol	Warner	48.6%
	Earley	50.9%
	Other	0.5%

Buena Vista	Warner	58.6%
	Earley	39.3%
	Other	2.1%

Charlottesville	Warner	72.9%
	Earley	24.9%
	Other	2.2%

Chesapeake	Warner	45.8%
	Earley	53.8%
	Other	0.4%

Colonial Heights	Warner	32.1%
	Earley	66.9%
	Other	1.0%

Covington	Warner	62.7%
	Earley	34.9%
	Other	2.4%

Danville	Warner	53.5%
	Earley	44.8%
	Other	1.7%

Emporia	Warner	59.4%
	Earley	40.1%
	Other	0.5%

Fairfax	Warner	51.7%
	Earley	47.6%
	Other	0.6%

Falls Church	Warner	65.8%
	Earley	33.3%
	Other	0.9%

Franklin	Warner	64.5%
	Earley	35.1%
	Other	0.3%

Fredericksburg	Warner	61.0%
	Earley	37.7%
	Other	1.3%

Galax	Warner	54.0%
	Earley	45.7%
	Other	0.4%

Hampton	Warner	63.7%
	Earley	35.8%
	Other	0.5%

Harrisonburg	Warner	47.7%
	Earley	51.5%
	Other	0.8%

Hopewell	Warner	49.4%
	Earley	48.8%
	Other	1.8%

Lexington	Warner	64.6%
	Earley	33.9%
	Other	1.5%

Lynchburg	Warner	53.0%
	Earley	46.3%
	Other	0.7%

Manassas	Warner	45.7%
	Earley	53.8%
	Other	0.5%

Manassas Park	Warner	46.3%
	Earley	52.9%
	Other	0.9%

Martinsville	Warner	67.0%
	Earley	32.6%
	Other	0.4%

Newport News	Warner	57.0%
	Earley	42.5%
	Other	0.5%

Norfolk	Warner	65.2%
	Earley	34.0%
	Other	0.7%

Norton	Warner	67.6%
	Earley	32.0%
	Other	0.4%

Petersburg	Warner	82.0%
	Earley	17.6%
	Other	0.4%

Poquoson	Warner	35.7%
	Earley	63.7%
	Other	0.6%

Portsmouth	Warner	65.7%
	Earley	33.8%
	Other	0.4%

Radford	Warner	58.9%
	Earley	40.2%
	Other	0.8%

Richmond	Warner	73.3%
	Earley	25.6%
	Other	1.1%

Roanoke	Warner	62.1%
	Earley	37.0%
	Other	0.8%

Salem	Warner	49.7%
	Earley	49.4%
	Other	0.8%

Staunton	Warner	48.8%
	Earley	50.6%
	Other	0.6%

Suffolk	Warner	53.1%
	Earley	46.5%
	Other	0.4%

Virginia Beach	Warner	46.3%
	Earley	53.0%
	Other	0.6%

Waynesboro	Warner	42.9%
	Earley	56.5%
	Other	0.5%

Williamsburg	Warner	57.5%
	Earley	41.6%
	Other	0.9%

Winchester	Warner	51.4%
	Earley	47.7%
	Other	0.8%

National DataGraph for 2001 - Virginia Results for 2001

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved