Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2007-03-31

Map

Map

Adair	Culver	56.0%
	Hartwig	40.2%
	Other	3.8%

Adams	Culver	50.8%
	Hartwig	44.9%
	Other	4.3%

Allamakee	Culver	49.2%
	Hartwig	45.9%
	Other	4.9%

Appanoose	Culver	55.5%
	Hartwig	41.9%
	Other	2.6%

Audubon	Culver	55.3%
	Hartwig	41.3%
	Other	3.4%

Benton	Culver	57.1%
	Hartwig	39.7%
	Other	3.3%

Black Hawk	Culver	58.0%
	Hartwig	38.2%
	Other	3.8%

Boone	Culver	58.7%
	Hartwig	37.9%
	Other	3.5%

Bremer	Culver	51.9%
	Hartwig	44.3%
	Other	3.8%

Buchanan	Culver	59.4%
	Hartwig	37.0%
	Other	3.6%

Buena Vista	Culver	43.9%
	Hartwig	53.0%
	Other	3.0%

Butler	Culver	44.1%
	Hartwig	52.2%
	Other	3.6%

Calhoun	Culver	51.1%
	Hartwig	45.5%
	Other	3.4%

Carroll	Culver	60.3%
	Hartwig	36.9%
	Other	2.9%

Cass	Culver	39.9%
	Hartwig	56.9%
	Other	3.2%

Cedar	Culver	50.7%
	Hartwig	45.1%
	Other	4.2%

Cerro Gordo	Culver	54.5%
	Hartwig	40.9%
	Other	4.6%

Cherokee	Culver	46.2%
	Hartwig	49.7%
	Other	4.1%

Chickasaw	Culver	61.7%
	Hartwig	34.2%
	Other	4.1%

Clarke	Culver	59.1%
	Hartwig	36.3%
	Other	4.6%

Clay	Culver	44.7%
	Hartwig	51.9%
	Other	3.4%

Clayton	Culver	58.3%
	Hartwig	38.1%
	Other	3.6%

Clinton	Culver	52.3%
	Hartwig	43.5%
	Other	4.2%

Crawford	Culver	48.7%
	Hartwig	49.1%
	Other	2.2%

Dallas	Culver	52.0%
	Hartwig	44.9%
	Other	3.0%

Davis	Culver	58.6%
	Hartwig	38.3%
	Other	3.1%

Decatur	Culver	54.5%
	Hartwig	40.6%
	Other	4.9%

Delaware	Culver	54.9%
	Hartwig	43.1%
	Other	2.0%

Des Moines	Culver	58.7%
	Hartwig	36.8%
	Other	4.5%

Dickinson	Culver	44.8%
	Hartwig	50.6%
	Other	4.6%

Dubuque	Culver	65.0%
	Hartwig	31.6%
	Other	3.4%

Emmet	Culver	52.6%
	Hartwig	42.5%
	Other	5.0%

Fayette	Culver	58.0%
	Hartwig	39.5%
	Other	2.5%

Floyd	Culver	56.4%
	Hartwig	39.5%
	Other	4.1%

Franklin	Culver	46.6%
	Hartwig	49.3%
	Other	4.1%

Fremont	Culver	41.0%
	Hartwig	54.6%
	Other	4.4%

Greene	Culver	60.4%
	Hartwig	36.7%
	Other	3.0%

Grundy	Culver	43.1%
	Hartwig	54.7%
	Other	2.2%

Guthrie	Culver	56.1%
	Hartwig	40.6%
	Other	3.3%

Hamilton	Culver	53.9%
	Hartwig	42.8%
	Other	3.3%

Hancock	Culver	42.7%
	Hartwig	52.9%
	Other	4.4%

Hardin	Culver	52.6%
	Hartwig	44.0%
	Other	3.3%

Harrison	Culver	41.0%
	Hartwig	54.0%
	Other	5.0%

Henry	Culver	45.5%
	Hartwig	50.0%
	Other	4.5%

Howard	Culver	55.9%
	Hartwig	38.5%
	Other	5.6%

Humboldt	Culver	51.2%
	Hartwig	45.7%
	Other	3.1%

Ida	Culver	41.9%
	Hartwig	55.6%
	Other	2.5%

Iowa	Culver	52.2%
	Hartwig	44.3%
	Other	3.5%

Jackson	Culver	58.5%
	Hartwig	37.9%
	Other	3.6%

Jasper	Culver	60.3%
	Hartwig	37.1%
	Other	2.6%

Jefferson	Culver	43.9%
	Hartwig	42.4%
	Other	13.7%

Johnson	Culver	61.1%
	Hartwig	31.3%
	Other	7.5%

Jones	Culver	57.9%
	Hartwig	38.6%
	Other	3.5%

Keokuk	Culver	55.1%
	Hartwig	43.5%
	Other	1.4%

Kossuth	Culver	56.4%
	Hartwig	39.8%
	Other	3.9%

Lee	Culver	56.9%
	Hartwig	37.2%
	Other	6.0%

Linn	Culver	59.2%
	Hartwig	37.1%
	Other	3.7%

Louisa	Culver	44.4%
	Hartwig	50.6%
	Other	5.0%

Lucas	Culver	56.4%
	Hartwig	41.4%
	Other	2.2%

Lyon	Culver	22.8%
	Hartwig	74.8%
	Other	2.4%

Madison	Culver	52.3%
	Hartwig	44.5%
	Other	3.1%

Mahaska	Culver	46.2%
	Hartwig	51.8%
	Other	2.1%

Marion	Culver	49.0%
	Hartwig	48.6%
	Other	2.3%

Marshall	Culver	54.8%
	Hartwig	42.3%
	Other	2.9%

Mills	Culver	33.5%
	Hartwig	61.5%
	Other	5.0%

Mitchell	Culver	48.3%
	Hartwig	46.2%
	Other	5.6%

Monona	Culver	49.7%
	Hartwig	45.9%
	Other	4.4%

Monroe	Culver	61.4%
	Hartwig	35.0%
	Other	3.5%

Montgomery	Culver	35.9%
	Hartwig	59.2%
	Other	4.9%

Muscatine	Culver	45.4%
	Hartwig	50.0%
	Other	4.6%

O'Brien	Culver	30.9%
	Hartwig	65.5%
	Other	3.7%

Osceola	Culver	29.7%
	Hartwig	66.7%
	Other	3.6%

Page	Culver	30.9%
	Hartwig	65.7%
	Other	3.3%

Palo Alto	Culver	58.6%
	Hartwig	39.1%
	Other	2.3%

Plymouth	Culver	36.7%
	Hartwig	59.6%
	Other	3.7%

Pocahontas	Culver	47.9%
	Hartwig	44.1%
	Other	8.0%

Polk	Culver	58.1%
	Hartwig	38.9%
	Other	3.0%

Pottawattamie	Culver	42.1%
	Hartwig	53.3%
	Other	4.6%

Poweshiek	Culver	56.0%
	Hartwig	39.9%
	Other	4.2%

Ringgold	Culver	57.1%
	Hartwig	40.1%
	Other	2.8%

Sac	Culver	45.1%
	Hartwig	51.5%
	Other	3.5%

Scott	Culver	47.2%
	Hartwig	48.2%
	Other	4.6%

Shelby	Culver	41.1%
	Hartwig	54.9%
	Other	4.0%

Sioux	Culver	14.9%
	Hartwig	84.4%
	Other	0.7%

Story	Culver	56.1%
	Hartwig	38.8%
	Other	5.1%

Tama	Culver	56.7%
	Hartwig	40.2%
	Other	3.2%

Taylor	Culver	48.3%
	Hartwig	47.5%
	Other	4.1%

Union	Culver	54.1%
	Hartwig	42.3%
	Other	3.6%

Van Buren	Culver	41.7%
	Hartwig	53.3%
	Other	4.9%

Wapello	Culver	65.7%
	Hartwig	30.7%
	Other	3.6%

Warren	Culver	57.3%
	Hartwig	40.2%
	Other	2.6%

Washington	Culver	49.7%
	Hartwig	46.6%
	Other	3.8%

Wayne	Culver	55.5%
	Hartwig	42.1%
	Other	2.4%

Webster	Culver	59.0%
	Hartwig	37.1%
	Other	3.9%

Winnebago	Culver	46.6%
	Hartwig	48.7%
	Other	4.7%

Winneshiek	Culver	49.4%
	Hartwig	44.8%
	Other	5.8%

Woodbury	Culver	47.8%
	Hartwig	48.3%
	Other	3.9%

Worth	Culver	52.8%
	Hartwig	41.2%
	Other	6.0%

Wright	Culver	49.7%
	Hartwig	49.1%
	Other	1.2%

National DataGraph for 2002 - Iowa Results for 2002

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved