Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Atlantic	Lautenberg	53.8%
	Forrester	44.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Bergen	Lautenberg	54.8%
	Forrester	43.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Burlington	Lautenberg	51.7%
	Forrester	46.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Camden	Lautenberg	63.2%
	Forrester	33.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Cape May	Lautenberg	44.6%
	Forrester	53.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Cumberland	Lautenberg	54.6%
	Forrester	42.3%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Essex	Lautenberg	71.1%
	Forrester	27.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Gloucester	Lautenberg	55.5%
	Forrester	42.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Hudson	Lautenberg	72.8%
	Forrester	24.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Hunterdon	Lautenberg	34.6%
	Forrester	62.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Mercer	Lautenberg	57.6%
	Forrester	39.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Middlesex	Lautenberg	58.6%
	Forrester	39.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Monmouth	Lautenberg	46.2%
	Forrester	51.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Morris	Lautenberg	40.3%
	Forrester	58.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Ocean	Lautenberg	45.2%
	Forrester	52.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Passaic	Lautenberg	56.1%
	Forrester	42.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Salem	Lautenberg	50.5%
	Forrester	46.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Somerset	Lautenberg	43.4%
	Forrester	54.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Sussex	Lautenberg	34.3%
	Forrester	63.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Union	Lautenberg	57.7%
	Forrester	40.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Warren	Lautenberg	37.7%
	Forrester	59.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

National DataGraph for 2002 - New Jersey Results for 2002

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved