Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2016-11-27

Map

Map

Adair	McMahan	54.5%
	Jones	45.5%

Alfalfa	McMahan	56.5%
	Jones	43.5%

Atoka	McMahan	68.4%
	Jones	31.6%

Beaver	McMahan	34.2%
	Jones	65.8%

Beckham	McMahan	60.6%
	Jones	39.4%

Blaine	McMahan	52.5%
	Jones	47.5%

Bryan	McMahan	62.0%
	Jones	38.0%

Caddo	McMahan	65.9%
	Jones	34.1%

Canadian	McMahan	41.9%
	Jones	58.1%

Carter	McMahan	55.0%
	Jones	45.0%

Cherokee	McMahan	64.8%
	Jones	35.2%

Choctaw	McMahan	71.9%
	Jones	28.1%

Cimarron	McMahan	47.1%
	Jones	52.9%

Cleveland	McMahan	47.3%
	Jones	52.7%

Coal	McMahan	73.6%
	Jones	26.4%

Comanche	McMahan	47.6%
	Jones	52.4%

Cotton	McMahan	58.0%
	Jones	42.0%

Craig	McMahan	61.1%
	Jones	38.9%

Creek	McMahan	52.2%
	Jones	47.8%

Custer	McMahan	57.1%
	Jones	42.9%

Delaware	McMahan	53.8%
	Jones	46.2%

Dewey	McMahan	53.1%
	Jones	46.9%

Ellis	McMahan	46.8%
	Jones	53.2%

Garfield	McMahan	40.3%
	Jones	59.7%

Garvin	McMahan	65.3%
	Jones	34.7%

Grady	McMahan	57.2%
	Jones	42.8%

Grant	McMahan	46.5%
	Jones	53.5%

Greer	McMahan	67.6%
	Jones	32.4%

Harmon	McMahan	68.0%
	Jones	32.0%

Harper	McMahan	46.7%
	Jones	53.3%

Haskell	McMahan	70.7%
	Jones	29.3%

Hughes	McMahan	72.5%
	Jones	27.5%

Jackson	McMahan	55.4%
	Jones	44.6%

Jefferson	McMahan	64.5%
	Jones	35.5%

Johnston	McMahan	71.3%
	Jones	28.7%

Kay	McMahan	42.8%
	Jones	57.2%

Kingfisher	McMahan	43.7%
	Jones	56.3%

Kiowa	McMahan	62.6%
	Jones	37.4%

Latimer	McMahan	72.2%
	Jones	27.8%

Le Flore	McMahan	62.9%
	Jones	37.1%

Lincoln	McMahan	55.6%
	Jones	44.4%

Logan	McMahan	48.0%
	Jones	52.0%

Love	McMahan	64.5%
	Jones	35.5%

McClain	McMahan	54.5%
	Jones	45.5%

McCurtain	McMahan	70.7%
	Jones	29.3%

McIntosh	McMahan	69.2%
	Jones	30.8%

Major	McMahan	37.3%
	Jones	62.7%

Marshall	McMahan	59.4%
	Jones	40.6%

Mayes	McMahan	60.2%
	Jones	39.8%

Murray	McMahan	66.7%
	Jones	33.3%

Muskogee	McMahan	65.1%
	Jones	34.9%

Noble	McMahan	48.7%
	Jones	51.3%

Nowata	McMahan	56.3%
	Jones	43.7%

Okfuskee	McMahan	67.8%
	Jones	32.2%

Oklahoma	McMahan	47.6%
	Jones	52.4%

Okmulgee	McMahan	65.8%
	Jones	34.2%

Osage	McMahan	59.9%
	Jones	40.1%

Ottawa	McMahan	61.5%
	Jones	38.5%

Pawnee	McMahan	57.3%
	Jones	42.7%

Payne	McMahan	48.6%
	Jones	51.4%

Pittsburg	McMahan	69.6%
	Jones	30.4%

Pontotoc	McMahan	64.9%
	Jones	35.1%

Pottawatomie	McMahan	66.4%
	Jones	33.6%

Pushmataha	McMahan	72.1%
	Jones	27.9%

Roger Mills	McMahan	56.7%
	Jones	43.3%

Rogers	McMahan	49.6%
	Jones	50.4%

Seminole	McMahan	67.6%
	Jones	32.4%

Sequoyah	McMahan	63.2%
	Jones	36.8%

Stephens	McMahan	52.9%
	Jones	47.1%

Texas	McMahan	36.9%
	Jones	63.1%

Tillman	McMahan	64.4%
	Jones	35.6%

Tulsa	McMahan	41.1%
	Jones	58.9%

Wagoner	McMahan	50.3%
	Jones	49.7%

Washington	McMahan	39.1%
	Jones	60.9%

Washita	McMahan	61.5%
	Jones	38.5%

Woods	McMahan	49.4%
	Jones	50.6%

Woodward	McMahan	46.0%
	Jones	54.0%

National DataGraph for 2002 - Oklahoma Results for 2002

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved