Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Alamance	Bowles	41.9%
	Burr	56.8%
	Other	1.3%

Alexander	Bowles	34.5%
	Burr	64.1%
	Other	1.4%

Alleghany	Bowles	40.4%
	Burr	58.3%
	Other	1.4%

Anson	Bowles	62.4%
	Burr	36.6%
	Other	1.0%

Ashe	Bowles	39.3%
	Burr	59.3%
	Other	1.5%

Avery	Bowles	26.5%
	Burr	71.3%
	Other	2.2%

Beaufort	Bowles	41.9%
	Burr	56.5%
	Other	1.6%

Bertie	Bowles	66.0%
	Burr	33.3%
	Other	0.7%

Bladen	Bowles	56.1%
	Burr	42.7%
	Other	1.2%

Brunswick	Bowles	43.2%
	Burr	55.1%
	Other	1.7%

Buncombe	Bowles	51.4%
	Burr	46.5%
	Other	2.1%

Burke	Bowles	40.9%
	Burr	57.3%
	Other	1.8%

Cabarrus	Bowles	36.5%
	Burr	61.7%
	Other	1.8%

Caldwell	Bowles	35.4%
	Burr	62.7%
	Other	1.8%

Camden	Bowles	42.4%
	Burr	56.0%
	Other	1.7%

Carteret	Bowles	34.9%
	Burr	63.3%
	Other	1.8%

Caswell	Bowles	50.4%
	Burr	48.5%
	Other	1.1%

Catawba	Bowles	35.4%
	Burr	63.1%
	Other	1.5%

Chatham	Bowles	52.8%
	Burr	45.9%
	Other	1.3%

Cherokee	Bowles	37.6%
	Burr	60.9%
	Other	1.5%

Chowan	Bowles	50.9%
	Burr	47.4%
	Other	1.7%

Clay	Bowles	36.9%
	Burr	61.1%
	Other	2.1%

Cleveland	Bowles	43.9%
	Burr	54.6%
	Other	1.4%

Columbus	Bowles	56.8%
	Burr	41.8%
	Other	1.4%

Craven	Bowles	41.0%
	Burr	57.4%
	Other	1.6%

Cumberland	Bowles	52.4%
	Burr	46.2%
	Other	1.4%

Currituck	Bowles	37.8%
	Burr	59.7%
	Other	2.5%

Dare	Bowles	44.8%
	Burr	52.7%
	Other	2.5%

Davidson	Bowles	32.9%
	Burr	65.5%
	Other	1.6%

Davie	Bowles	27.1%
	Burr	71.4%
	Other	1.4%

Duplin	Bowles	46.9%
	Burr	52.0%
	Other	1.2%

Durham	Bowles	69.5%
	Burr	29.4%
	Other	1.1%

Edgecombe	Bowles	65.5%
	Burr	33.5%
	Other	0.9%

Forsyth	Bowles	45.8%
	Burr	53.1%
	Other	1.0%

Franklin	Bowles	48.8%
	Burr	49.8%
	Other	1.4%

Gaston	Bowles	35.7%
	Burr	62.6%
	Other	1.7%

Gates	Bowles	57.9%
	Burr	40.7%
	Other	1.3%

Graham	Bowles	38.3%
	Burr	60.1%
	Other	1.6%

Granville	Bowles	53.1%
	Burr	45.7%
	Other	1.2%

Greene	Bowles	46.9%
	Burr	52.4%
	Other	0.8%

Guilford	Bowles	53.5%
	Burr	45.3%
	Other	1.2%

Halifax	Bowles	63.1%
	Burr	36.0%
	Other	0.8%

Harnett	Bowles	41.5%
	Burr	57.2%
	Other	1.4%

Haywood	Bowles	48.6%
	Burr	49.5%
	Other	1.8%

Henderson	Bowles	37.6%
	Burr	61.1%
	Other	1.3%

Hertford	Bowles	68.0%
	Burr	31.0%
	Other	1.0%

Hoke	Bowles	57.5%
	Burr	40.6%
	Other	1.8%

Hyde	Bowles	50.7%
	Burr	48.1%
	Other	1.3%

Iredell	Bowles	35.8%
	Burr	62.5%
	Other	1.6%

Jackson	Bowles	51.2%
	Burr	47.2%
	Other	1.6%

Johnston	Bowles	37.1%
	Burr	61.9%
	Other	1.1%

Jones	Bowles	46.1%
	Burr	52.7%
	Other	1.1%

Lee	Bowles	45.9%
	Burr	52.7%
	Other	1.3%

Lenoir	Bowles	48.2%
	Burr	51.2%
	Other	0.6%

Lincoln	Bowles	36.0%
	Burr	62.2%
	Other	1.9%

McDowell	Bowles	39.1%
	Burr	59.2%
	Other	1.7%

Macon	Bowles	40.8%
	Burr	58.1%
	Other	1.1%

Madison	Bowles	49.1%
	Burr	49.2%
	Other	1.6%

Martin	Bowles	55.1%
	Burr	44.0%
	Other	0.9%

Mecklenburg	Bowles	54.4%
	Burr	44.3%
	Other	1.3%

Mitchell	Bowles	28.7%
	Burr	69.4%
	Other	1.8%

Montgomery	Bowles	46.6%
	Burr	52.0%
	Other	1.4%

Moore	Bowles	39.1%
	Burr	59.9%
	Other	1.0%

Nash	Bowles	46.4%
	Burr	52.7%
	Other	0.9%

New Hanover	Bowles	45.8%
	Burr	52.1%
	Other	2.1%

Northampton	Bowles	66.9%
	Burr	32.2%
	Other	0.8%

Onslow	Bowles	34.8%
	Burr	63.2%
	Other	2.1%

Orange	Bowles	67.8%
	Burr	30.9%
	Other	1.3%

Pamlico	Bowles	43.3%
	Burr	55.3%
	Other	1.4%

Pasquotank	Bowles	55.9%
	Burr	42.7%
	Other	1.4%

Pender	Bowles	43.9%
	Burr	54.6%
	Other	1.5%

Perquimans	Bowles	46.0%
	Burr	52.7%
	Other	1.3%

Person	Bowles	44.4%
	Burr	54.4%
	Other	1.2%

Pitt	Bowles	49.2%
	Burr	50.1%
	Other	0.8%

Polk	Bowles	45.5%
	Burr	52.7%
	Other	1.7%

Randolph	Bowles	29.5%
	Burr	68.9%
	Other	1.5%

Richmond	Bowles	57.2%
	Burr	40.8%
	Other	2.1%

Robeson	Bowles	60.7%
	Burr	37.9%
	Other	1.4%

Rockingham	Bowles	41.5%
	Burr	57.1%
	Other	1.4%

Rowan	Bowles	36.0%
	Burr	62.1%
	Other	2.0%

Rutherford	Bowles	40.1%
	Burr	58.4%
	Other	1.5%

Sampson	Bowles	47.5%
	Burr	51.7%
	Other	0.8%

Scotland	Bowles	58.5%
	Burr	40.4%
	Other	1.1%

Stanly	Bowles	34.4%
	Burr	64.1%
	Other	1.5%

Stokes	Bowles	30.9%
	Burr	67.8%
	Other	1.3%

Surry	Bowles	33.9%
	Burr	65.0%
	Other	1.1%

Swain	Bowles	51.6%
	Burr	46.8%
	Other	1.6%

Transylvania	Bowles	42.0%
	Burr	56.2%
	Other	1.8%

Tyrrell	Bowles	55.7%
	Burr	42.8%
	Other	1.6%

Union	Bowles	32.7%
	Burr	66.1%
	Other	1.2%

Vance	Bowles	60.6%
	Burr	38.6%
	Other	0.7%

Wake	Bowles	51.4%
	Burr	47.3%
	Other	1.2%

Warren	Bowles	67.6%
	Burr	31.3%
	Other	1.1%

Washington	Bowles	60.1%
	Burr	38.9%
	Other	1.1%

Watauga	Bowles	46.2%
	Burr	51.3%
	Other	2.4%

Wayne	Bowles	42.3%
	Burr	56.9%
	Other	0.8%

Wilkes	Bowles	32.5%
	Burr	65.9%
	Other	1.6%

Wilson	Bowles	51.5%
	Burr	47.7%
	Other	0.7%

Yadkin	Bowles	25.3%
	Burr	73.3%
	Other	1.4%

Yancey	Bowles	49.9%
	Burr	48.6%
	Other	1.4%

National DataGraph for 2004 - North Carolina Results for 2004

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved