Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2007-05-18

Map

Map

Adams	Casey	49.3%
	Pepper	47.4%
	Other	3.3%

Allegheny	Casey	68.7%
	Pepper	29.0%
	Other	2.2%

Armstrong	Casey	60.5%
	Pepper	37.3%
	Other	2.2%

Beaver	Casey	69.8%
	Pepper	27.9%
	Other	2.3%

Bedford	Casey	51.4%
	Pepper	46.7%
	Other	1.9%

Berks	Casey	58.3%
	Pepper	38.6%
	Other	3.1%

Blair	Casey	56.3%
	Pepper	41.6%
	Other	2.1%

Bradford	Casey	44.5%
	Pepper	53.1%
	Other	2.4%

Bucks	Casey	54.3%
	Pepper	43.6%
	Other	2.0%

Butler	Casey	53.9%
	Pepper	43.5%
	Other	2.6%

Cambria	Casey	75.8%
	Pepper	22.1%
	Other	2.1%

Cameron	Casey	56.1%
	Pepper	40.3%
	Other	3.6%

Carbon	Casey	60.8%
	Pepper	36.7%
	Other	2.5%

Centre	Casey	60.8%
	Pepper	35.0%
	Other	4.3%

Chester	Casey	52.0%
	Pepper	45.1%
	Other	2.9%

Clarion	Casey	56.4%
	Pepper	40.3%
	Other	3.3%

Clearfield	Casey	64.7%
	Pepper	32.8%
	Other	2.5%

Clinton	Casey	60.3%
	Pepper	37.2%
	Other	2.5%

Columbia	Casey	60.5%
	Pepper	36.9%
	Other	2.6%

Crawford	Casey	51.1%
	Pepper	46.7%
	Other	2.2%

Cumberland	Casey	52.2%
	Pepper	44.8%
	Other	2.9%

Dauphin	Casey	60.1%
	Pepper	37.3%
	Other	2.5%

Delaware	Casey	58.3%
	Pepper	40.1%
	Other	1.6%

Elk	Casey	70.2%
	Pepper	27.7%
	Other	2.2%

Erie	Casey	59.2%
	Pepper	39.2%
	Other	1.7%

Fayette	Casey	72.0%
	Pepper	25.7%
	Other	2.3%

Forest	Casey	54.1%
	Pepper	43.2%
	Other	2.7%

Franklin	Casey	42.6%
	Pepper	54.5%
	Other	2.8%

Fulton	Casey	40.7%
	Pepper	56.7%
	Other	2.6%

Greene	Casey	70.7%
	Pepper	26.8%
	Other	2.5%

Huntingdon	Casey	53.3%
	Pepper	44.0%
	Other	2.7%

Indiana	Casey	63.7%
	Pepper	34.0%
	Other	2.3%

Jefferson	Casey	53.3%
	Pepper	43.8%
	Other	2.9%

Juniata	Casey	51.1%
	Pepper	46.4%
	Other	2.6%

Lackawanna	Casey	73.6%
	Pepper	24.8%
	Other	1.6%

Lancaster	Casey	43.2%
	Pepper	54.5%
	Other	2.3%

Lawrence	Casey	67.6%
	Pepper	30.2%
	Other	2.2%

Lebanon	Casey	47.5%
	Pepper	49.9%
	Other	2.6%

Lehigh	Casey	58.1%
	Pepper	39.5%
	Other	2.4%

Luzerne	Casey	65.8%
	Pepper	32.1%
	Other	2.0%

Lycoming	Casey	44.5%
	Pepper	53.4%
	Other	2.2%

McKean	Casey	42.1%
	Pepper	55.4%
	Other	2.5%

Mercer	Casey	59.4%
	Pepper	38.1%
	Other	2.5%

Mifflin	Casey	46.2%
	Pepper	51.5%
	Other	2.3%

Monroe	Casey	55.4%
	Pepper	42.3%
	Other	2.2%

Montgomery	Casey	58.4%
	Pepper	39.6%
	Other	2.1%

Montour	Casey	54.8%
	Pepper	42.5%
	Other	2.7%

Northampton	Casey	58.4%
	Pepper	39.1%
	Other	2.5%

Northumberland	Casey	55.0%
	Pepper	42.5%
	Other	2.5%

Perry	Casey	49.3%
	Pepper	47.4%
	Other	3.3%

Philadelphia	Casey	83.9%
	Pepper	14.5%
	Other	1.6%

Pike	Casey	44.5%
	Pepper	53.4%
	Other	2.1%

Potter	Casey	39.9%
	Pepper	56.9%
	Other	3.2%

Schuylkill	Casey	62.6%
	Pepper	35.1%
	Other	2.4%

Snyder	Casey	44.9%
	Pepper	51.8%
	Other	3.3%

Somerset	Casey	62.3%
	Pepper	35.9%
	Other	1.8%

Sullivan	Casey	49.5%
	Pepper	47.9%
	Other	2.6%

Susquehanna	Casey	52.6%
	Pepper	44.6%
	Other	2.8%

Tioga	Casey	41.4%
	Pepper	54.8%
	Other	3.8%

Union	Casey	47.4%
	Pepper	49.4%
	Other	3.2%

Venango	Casey	53.7%
	Pepper	43.5%
	Other	2.8%

Warren	Casey	50.7%
	Pepper	46.2%
	Other	3.1%

Washington	Casey	67.8%
	Pepper	30.4%
	Other	1.9%

Wayne	Casey	47.8%
	Pepper	49.8%
	Other	2.4%

Westmoreland	Casey	62.7%
	Pepper	35.6%
	Other	1.7%

Wyoming	Casey	53.3%
	Pepper	43.5%
	Other	3.1%

York	Casey	46.0%
	Pepper	51.7%
	Other	2.3%

National DataGraph for 2004 - Pennsylvania Results for 2004

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved