Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Adair	Rice	40.8%
	Inhofe	55.2%
	Wallace	4.1%

Alfalfa	Rice	26.4%
	Inhofe	67.2%
	Wallace	6.4%

Atoka	Rice	39.5%
	Inhofe	56.5%
	Wallace	4.0%

Beaver	Rice	14.7%
	Inhofe	80.8%
	Wallace	4.5%

Beckham	Rice	31.8%
	Inhofe	63.9%
	Wallace	4.3%

Blaine	Rice	31.9%
	Inhofe	64.3%
	Wallace	3.9%

Bryan	Rice	38.9%
	Inhofe	56.9%
	Wallace	4.2%

Caddo	Rice	43.4%
	Inhofe	52.3%
	Wallace	4.4%

Canadian	Rice	29.1%
	Inhofe	66.7%
	Wallace	4.3%

Carter	Rice	35.6%
	Inhofe	60.3%
	Wallace	4.1%

Cherokee	Rice	51.1%
	Inhofe	44.4%
	Wallace	4.5%

Choctaw	Rice	44.3%
	Inhofe	51.0%
	Wallace	4.6%

Cimarron	Rice	16.4%
	Inhofe	78.2%
	Wallace	5.4%

Cleveland	Rice	40.9%
	Inhofe	54.7%
	Wallace	4.4%

Coal	Rice	40.9%
	Inhofe	54.8%
	Wallace	4.3%

Comanche	Rice	41.0%
	Inhofe	54.8%
	Wallace	4.2%

Cotton	Rice	33.2%
	Inhofe	62.3%
	Wallace	4.5%

Craig	Rice	44.2%
	Inhofe	51.3%
	Wallace	4.5%

Creek	Rice	35.4%
	Inhofe	60.4%
	Wallace	4.1%

Custer	Rice	30.6%
	Inhofe	65.6%
	Wallace	3.8%

Delaware	Rice	39.7%
	Inhofe	55.4%
	Wallace	4.9%

Dewey	Rice	24.3%
	Inhofe	71.5%
	Wallace	4.1%

Ellis	Rice	21.8%
	Inhofe	73.2%
	Wallace	5.0%

Garfield	Rice	28.2%
	Inhofe	67.7%
	Wallace	4.1%

Garvin	Rice	36.8%
	Inhofe	58.1%
	Wallace	5.1%

Grady	Rice	34.4%
	Inhofe	60.5%
	Wallace	5.1%

Grant	Rice	28.0%
	Inhofe	66.7%
	Wallace	5.3%

Greer	Rice	36.4%
	Inhofe	59.0%
	Wallace	4.6%

Harmon	Rice	38.9%
	Inhofe	57.7%
	Wallace	3.4%

Harper	Rice	20.7%
	Inhofe	75.4%
	Wallace	3.9%

Haskell	Rice	46.7%
	Inhofe	48.7%
	Wallace	4.6%

Hughes	Rice	46.2%
	Inhofe	49.3%
	Wallace	4.6%

Jackson	Rice	27.5%
	Inhofe	68.7%
	Wallace	3.8%

Jefferson	Rice	39.2%
	Inhofe	55.6%
	Wallace	5.2%

Johnston	Rice	41.9%
	Inhofe	53.8%
	Wallace	4.3%

Kay	Rice	33.3%
	Inhofe	61.4%
	Wallace	5.3%

Kingfisher	Rice	21.5%
	Inhofe	74.6%
	Wallace	3.8%

Kiowa	Rice	41.7%
	Inhofe	54.7%
	Wallace	3.6%

Latimer	Rice	45.7%
	Inhofe	49.1%
	Wallace	5.2%

Le Flore	Rice	41.2%
	Inhofe	53.5%
	Wallace	5.3%

Lincoln	Rice	33.1%
	Inhofe	61.9%
	Wallace	4.9%

Logan	Rice	34.5%
	Inhofe	61.3%
	Wallace	4.3%

Love	Rice	38.9%
	Inhofe	58.0%
	Wallace	3.0%

McClain	Rice	31.7%
	Inhofe	63.7%
	Wallace	4.6%

McCurtain	Rice	40.1%
	Inhofe	54.0%
	Wallace	5.9%

McIntosh	Rice	51.5%
	Inhofe	44.3%
	Wallace	4.2%

Major	Rice	21.4%
	Inhofe	73.8%
	Wallace	4.8%

Marshall	Rice	35.4%
	Inhofe	60.4%
	Wallace	4.2%

Mayes	Rice	44.9%
	Inhofe	51.0%
	Wallace	4.0%

Murray	Rice	38.9%
	Inhofe	56.3%
	Wallace	4.8%

Muskogee	Rice	51.4%
	Inhofe	44.4%
	Wallace	4.2%

Noble	Rice	29.9%
	Inhofe	65.0%
	Wallace	5.1%

Nowata	Rice	38.1%
	Inhofe	56.8%
	Wallace	5.1%

Okfuskee	Rice	45.0%
	Inhofe	51.0%
	Wallace	4.0%

Oklahoma	Rice	44.1%
	Inhofe	52.0%
	Wallace	3.9%

Okmulgee	Rice	50.2%
	Inhofe	46.2%
	Wallace	3.6%

Osage	Rice	44.3%
	Inhofe	51.7%
	Wallace	3.9%

Ottawa	Rice	43.3%
	Inhofe	51.5%
	Wallace	5.2%

Pawnee	Rice	39.7%
	Inhofe	55.5%
	Wallace	4.8%

Payne	Rice	38.7%
	Inhofe	56.4%
	Wallace	4.9%

Pittsburg	Rice	40.5%
	Inhofe	55.1%
	Wallace	4.4%

Pontotoc	Rice	39.4%
	Inhofe	55.8%
	Wallace	4.8%

Pottawatomie	Rice	37.0%
	Inhofe	58.1%
	Wallace	4.9%

Pushmataha	Rice	39.4%
	Inhofe	55.3%
	Wallace	5.3%

Roger Mills	Rice	28.0%
	Inhofe	68.0%
	Wallace	4.0%

Rogers	Rice	35.2%
	Inhofe	60.7%
	Wallace	4.1%

Seminole	Rice	41.8%
	Inhofe	53.6%
	Wallace	4.6%

Sequoyah	Rice	44.6%
	Inhofe	50.9%
	Wallace	4.5%

Stephens	Rice	30.8%
	Inhofe	64.5%
	Wallace	4.7%

Texas	Rice	18.0%
	Inhofe	76.4%
	Wallace	5.6%

Tillman	Rice	37.3%
	Inhofe	58.2%
	Wallace	4.5%

Tulsa	Rice	39.9%
	Inhofe	56.8%
	Wallace	3.2%

Wagoner	Rice	35.5%
	Inhofe	60.7%
	Wallace	3.7%

Washington	Rice	30.9%
	Inhofe	65.2%
	Wallace	3.9%

Washita	Rice	31.6%
	Inhofe	63.8%
	Wallace	4.6%

Woods	Rice	26.0%
	Inhofe	68.9%
	Wallace	5.2%

Woodward	Rice	23.2%
	Inhofe	72.4%
	Wallace	4.4%

National DataGraph for 2008 - Oklahoma Results for 2008

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved