Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2009-02-02

Map

Map

Adams	McCord	38.8%
	Ellis	58.2%
	Other	3.0%

Allegheny	McCord	61.4%
	Ellis	36.1%
	Other	2.5%

Armstrong	McCord	44.9%
	Ellis	52.4%
	Other	2.7%

Beaver	McCord	56.0%
	Ellis	40.8%
	Other	3.2%

Bedford	McCord	33.4%
	Ellis	64.5%
	Other	2.2%

Berks	McCord	52.1%
	Ellis	45.3%
	Other	2.6%

Blair	McCord	38.6%
	Ellis	59.4%
	Other	2.0%

Bradford	McCord	37.4%
	Ellis	60.0%
	Other	2.6%

Bucks	McCord	51.1%
	Ellis	47.3%
	Other	1.6%

Butler	McCord	36.6%
	Ellis	60.6%
	Other	2.7%

Cambria	McCord	60.2%
	Ellis	37.5%
	Other	2.3%

Cameron	McCord	44.7%
	Ellis	51.6%
	Other	3.7%

Carbon	McCord	55.0%
	Ellis	41.9%
	Other	3.1%

Centre	McCord	52.1%
	Ellis	44.4%
	Other	3.5%

Chester	McCord	46.9%
	Ellis	50.4%
	Other	2.7%

Clarion	McCord	41.2%
	Ellis	53.4%
	Other	5.3%

Clearfield	McCord	50.3%
	Ellis	47.1%
	Other	2.7%

Clinton	McCord	50.5%
	Ellis	46.8%
	Other	2.7%

Columbia	McCord	49.8%
	Ellis	47.4%
	Other	2.8%

Crawford	McCord	44.5%
	Ellis	52.8%
	Other	2.7%

Cumberland	McCord	41.8%
	Ellis	55.4%
	Other	2.8%

Dauphin	McCord	53.7%
	Ellis	44.5%
	Other	1.8%

Delaware	McCord	54.6%
	Ellis	44.2%
	Other	1.2%

Elk	McCord	57.6%
	Ellis	39.8%
	Other	2.6%

Erie	McCord	59.5%
	Ellis	37.8%
	Other	2.7%

Fayette	McCord	62.3%
	Ellis	35.4%
	Other	2.3%

Forest	McCord	44.8%
	Ellis	51.9%
	Other	3.3%

Franklin	McCord	32.9%
	Ellis	64.3%
	Other	2.8%

Fulton	McCord	28.5%
	Ellis	68.8%
	Other	2.7%

Greene	McCord	60.6%
	Ellis	36.8%
	Other	2.5%

Huntingdon	McCord	38.4%
	Ellis	59.1%
	Other	2.5%

Indiana	McCord	51.1%
	Ellis	46.0%
	Other	2.9%

Jefferson	McCord	39.4%
	Ellis	57.4%
	Other	3.3%

Juniata	McCord	34.7%
	Ellis	62.3%
	Other	3.0%

Lackawanna	McCord	67.9%
	Ellis	29.6%
	Other	2.5%

Lancaster	McCord	40.9%
	Ellis	56.9%
	Other	2.2%

Lawrence	McCord	54.6%
	Ellis	43.2%
	Other	2.2%

Lebanon	McCord	41.3%
	Ellis	56.0%
	Other	2.7%

Lehigh	McCord	52.5%
	Ellis	45.1%
	Other	2.4%

Luzerne	McCord	59.6%
	Ellis	37.6%
	Other	2.8%

Lycoming	McCord	40.1%
	Ellis	57.5%
	Other	2.4%

McKean	McCord	39.8%
	Ellis	57.8%
	Other	2.3%

Mercer	McCord	51.3%
	Ellis	46.2%
	Other	2.5%

Mifflin	McCord	36.2%
	Ellis	61.8%
	Other	2.0%

Monroe	McCord	58.1%
	Ellis	40.3%
	Other	1.6%

Montgomery	McCord	54.5%
	Ellis	44.6%
	Other	0.9%

Montour	McCord	43.5%
	Ellis	52.9%
	Other	3.6%

Northampton	McCord	55.4%
	Ellis	43.2%
	Other	1.4%

Northumberland	McCord	46.7%
	Ellis	50.1%
	Other	3.2%

Perry	McCord	35.5%
	Ellis	60.7%
	Other	3.8%

Philadelphia	McCord	83.5%
	Ellis	15.7%
	Other	0.8%

Pike	McCord	46.4%
	Ellis	51.1%
	Other	2.5%

Potter	McCord	30.7%
	Ellis	65.8%
	Other	3.4%

Schuylkill	McCord	52.2%
	Ellis	45.2%
	Other	2.7%

Snyder	McCord	32.7%
	Ellis	64.3%
	Other	3.0%

Somerset	McCord	44.2%
	Ellis	53.3%
	Other	2.5%

Sullivan	McCord	43.1%
	Ellis	53.7%
	Other	3.2%

Susquehanna	McCord	41.7%
	Ellis	55.1%
	Other	3.2%

Tioga	McCord	32.5%
	Ellis	64.3%
	Other	3.2%

Union	McCord	40.2%
	Ellis	57.1%
	Other	2.7%

Venango	McCord	40.5%
	Ellis	55.4%
	Other	4.1%

Warren	McCord	45.9%
	Ellis	51.1%
	Other	3.0%

Washington	McCord	55.3%
	Ellis	42.3%
	Other	2.4%

Wayne	McCord	43.1%
	Ellis	53.9%
	Other	3.0%

Westmoreland	McCord	50.2%
	Ellis	47.3%
	Other	2.4%

Wyoming	McCord	44.3%
	Ellis	52.5%
	Other	3.2%

York	McCord	42.6%
	Ellis	54.8%
	Other	2.6%

National DataGraph for 2008 - Pennsylvania Results for 2008

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved