Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2008-08-11

Map

Map

Anderson	Tuke	27.2%
	Padgett	34.4%
	Eaton	5.9%
	Other	32.5%

Bedford	Tuke	31.3%
	Padgett	11.2%
	Eaton	8.0%
	Other	49.5%

Benton	Tuke	32.9%
	Padgett	16.4%
	Eaton	8.9%
	Other	41.8%

Bledsoe	Tuke	18.0%
	Padgett	13.5%
	Eaton	6.4%
	Other	62.1%

Blount	Tuke	8.3%
	Padgett	45.0%
	Eaton	6.3%
	Other	40.3%

Bradley	Tuke	16.6%
	Padgett	11.9%
	Eaton	3.5%
	Other	68.0%

Campbell	Tuke	10.9%
	Padgett	33.0%
	Eaton	5.4%
	Other	50.8%

Cannon	Tuke	32.2%
	Padgett	6.4%
	Eaton	6.4%
	Other	55.0%

Carroll	Tuke	26.1%
	Padgett	16.4%
	Eaton	7.3%
	Other	50.3%

Carter	Tuke	11.5%
	Padgett	14.4%
	Eaton	9.6%
	Other	64.4%

Cheatham	Tuke	36.6%
	Padgett	9.6%
	Eaton	9.1%
	Other	44.7%

Chester	Tuke	16.7%
	Padgett	8.1%
	Eaton	10.5%
	Other	64.8%

Claiborne	Tuke	7.1%
	Padgett	35.3%
	Eaton	5.3%
	Other	52.2%

Clay	Tuke	33.7%
	Padgett	9.9%
	Eaton	9.5%
	Other	46.9%

Cocke	Tuke	13.4%
	Padgett	24.9%
	Eaton	7.7%
	Other	54.0%

Coffee	Tuke	28.4%
	Padgett	9.7%
	Eaton	10.1%
	Other	51.8%

Crockett	Tuke	27.6%
	Padgett	13.0%
	Eaton	7.3%
	Other	52.1%

Cumberland	Tuke	29.9%
	Padgett	20.0%
	Eaton	6.8%
	Other	43.3%

Davidson	Tuke	56.5%
	Padgett	8.6%
	Eaton	11.7%
	Other	23.2%

Decatur	Tuke	30.9%
	Padgett	10.2%
	Eaton	9.6%
	Other	49.3%

DeKalb	Tuke	24.6%
	Padgett	8.6%
	Eaton	8.5%
	Other	58.2%

Dickson	Tuke	59.1%
	Padgett	10.3%
	Eaton	4.9%
	Other	25.7%

Dyer	Tuke	13.6%
	Padgett	6.2%
	Eaton	7.4%
	Other	72.8%

Fayette	Tuke	19.3%
	Padgett	8.4%
	Eaton	8.1%
	Other	64.1%

Fentress	Tuke	8.4%
	Padgett	15.6%
	Eaton	6.0%
	Other	70.0%

Franklin	Tuke	28.5%
	Padgett	13.1%
	Eaton	6.1%
	Other	52.3%

Gibson	Tuke	23.3%
	Padgett	8.7%
	Eaton	5.1%
	Other	62.9%

Giles	Tuke	24.4%
	Padgett	19.5%
	Eaton	5.2%
	Other	51.0%

Grainger	Tuke	27.9%
	Padgett	23.8%
	Eaton	4.9%
	Other	43.4%

Greene	Tuke	15.3%
	Padgett	20.2%
	Eaton	7.9%
	Other	56.7%

Grundy	Tuke	19.6%
	Padgett	9.6%
	Eaton	6.7%
	Other	64.1%

Hamblen	Tuke	12.9%
	Padgett	22.6%
	Eaton	5.8%
	Other	58.6%

Hamilton	Tuke	21.0%
	Padgett	12.3%
	Eaton	8.7%
	Other	58.1%

Hancock	Tuke	4.9%
	Padgett	25.0%
	Eaton	6.3%
	Other	63.9%

Hardeman	Tuke	26.4%
	Padgett	8.3%
	Eaton	11.3%
	Other	54.0%

Hardin	Tuke	17.1%
	Padgett	9.5%
	Eaton	6.7%
	Other	66.7%

Hawkins	Tuke	12.3%
	Padgett	15.9%
	Eaton	9.6%
	Other	62.2%

Haywood	Tuke	24.7%
	Padgett	6.3%
	Eaton	6.3%
	Other	62.8%

Henderson	Tuke	22.3%
	Padgett	13.2%
	Eaton	13.2%
	Other	51.3%

Henry	Tuke	46.3%
	Padgett	14.4%
	Eaton	6.0%
	Other	33.3%

Hickman	Tuke	29.0%
	Padgett	7.5%
	Eaton	10.0%
	Other	53.5%

Houston	Tuke	30.3%
	Padgett	12.7%
	Eaton	8.5%
	Other	48.5%

Humphreys	Tuke	33.4%
	Padgett	9.4%
	Eaton	11.1%
	Other	46.0%

Jackson	Tuke	42.2%
	Padgett	8.1%
	Eaton	9.7%
	Other	40.1%

Jefferson	Tuke	7.8%
	Padgett	41.0%
	Eaton	6.0%
	Other	45.2%

Johnson	Tuke	5.3%
	Padgett	19.4%
	Eaton	7.3%
	Other	68.0%

Knox	Tuke	15.7%
	Padgett	64.3%
	Eaton	4.9%
	Other	15.0%

Lake	Tuke	9.1%
	Padgett	6.0%
	Eaton	11.5%
	Other	73.4%

Lauderdale	Tuke	22.1%
	Padgett	11.9%
	Eaton	9.9%
	Other	56.1%

Lawrence	Tuke	47.8%
	Padgett	5.2%
	Eaton	7.5%
	Other	39.5%

Lewis	Tuke	26.7%
	Padgett	7.6%
	Eaton	8.9%
	Other	56.9%

Lincoln	Tuke	10.3%
	Padgett	10.2%
	Eaton	6.2%
	Other	73.4%

Loudon	Tuke	11.5%
	Padgett	43.6%
	Eaton	10.7%
	Other	34.3%

McMinn	Tuke	13.8%
	Padgett	26.9%
	Eaton	12.2%
	Other	47.2%

McNairy	Tuke	25.9%
	Padgett	10.5%
	Eaton	9.3%
	Other	54.3%

Macon	Tuke	21.0%
	Padgett	14.1%
	Eaton	9.0%
	Other	56.0%

Madison	Tuke	35.9%
	Padgett	12.4%
	Eaton	9.1%
	Other	42.6%

Marion	Tuke	12.5%
	Padgett	15.5%
	Eaton	6.3%
	Other	65.8%

Marshall	Tuke	36.5%
	Padgett	9.9%
	Eaton	15.2%
	Other	38.4%

Maury	Tuke	47.0%
	Padgett	13.8%
	Eaton	5.7%
	Other	33.4%

Meigs	Tuke	8.7%
	Padgett	20.9%
	Eaton	9.0%
	Other	61.5%

Monroe	Tuke	5.3%
	Padgett	51.9%
	Eaton	7.3%
	Other	35.6%

Montgomery	Tuke	32.2%
	Padgett	16.4%
	Eaton	7.9%
	Other	43.6%

Moore	Tuke	21.7%
	Padgett	10.5%
	Eaton	7.0%
	Other	60.9%

Morgan	Tuke	5.9%
	Padgett	29.0%
	Eaton	5.2%
	Other	59.9%

Obion	Tuke	15.5%
	Padgett	11.3%
	Eaton	9.2%
	Other	64.0%

Overton	Tuke	38.1%
	Padgett	14.1%
	Eaton	5.3%
	Other	42.5%

Perry	Tuke	24.6%
	Padgett	6.3%
	Eaton	9.8%
	Other	59.3%

Pickett	Tuke	36.5%
	Padgett	20.5%
	Eaton	9.0%
	Other	34.0%

Polk	Tuke	5.5%
	Padgett	26.0%
	Eaton	8.0%
	Other	60.5%

Putnam	Tuke	39.4%
	Padgett	10.0%
	Eaton	6.9%
	Other	43.8%

Rhea	Tuke	10.5%
	Padgett	14.4%
	Eaton	9.6%
	Other	65.5%

Roane	Tuke	12.5%
	Padgett	26.0%
	Eaton	7.8%
	Other	53.8%

Robertson	Tuke	44.6%
	Padgett	11.4%
	Eaton	8.0%
	Other	36.1%

Rutherford	Tuke	34.0%
	Padgett	10.2%
	Eaton	10.1%
	Other	45.7%

Scott	Tuke	6.5%
	Padgett	22.0%
	Eaton	9.2%
	Other	62.3%

Sequatchie	Tuke	11.0%
	Padgett	12.0%
	Eaton	7.3%
	Other	69.7%

Sevier	Tuke	8.3%
	Padgett	25.4%
	Eaton	7.8%
	Other	58.5%

Shelby	Tuke	42.5%
	Padgett	13.0%
	Eaton	7.8%
	Other	36.8%

Smith	Tuke	29.5%
	Padgett	13.3%
	Eaton	10.1%
	Other	47.2%

Stewart	Tuke	32.8%
	Padgett	10.3%
	Eaton	7.7%
	Other	49.2%

Sullivan	Tuke	11.9%
	Padgett	21.3%
	Eaton	10.2%
	Other	56.5%

Sumner	Tuke	50.4%
	Padgett	12.2%
	Eaton	7.6%
	Other	29.8%

Tipton	Tuke	29.4%
	Padgett	9.5%
	Eaton	6.4%
	Other	54.6%

Trousdale	Tuke	20.0%
	Padgett	15.2%
	Eaton	11.1%
	Other	53.7%

Unicoi	Tuke	12.9%
	Padgett	25.2%
	Eaton	5.4%
	Other	56.4%

Union	Tuke	5.5%
	Padgett	58.2%
	Eaton	5.2%
	Other	31.1%

Van Buren	Tuke	36.4%
	Padgett	10.2%
	Eaton	5.9%
	Other	47.5%

Warren	Tuke	25.0%
	Padgett	9.7%
	Eaton	12.5%
	Other	52.9%

Washington	Tuke	13.9%
	Padgett	18.4%
	Eaton	7.7%
	Other	60.0%

Wayne	Tuke	37.1%
	Padgett	11.3%
	Eaton	9.9%
	Other	41.7%

Weakley	Tuke	26.4%
	Padgett	14.3%
	Eaton	16.3%
	Other	43.0%

White	Tuke	38.3%
	Padgett	10.1%
	Eaton	5.2%
	Other	46.4%

Williamson	Tuke	43.7%
	Padgett	14.2%
	Eaton	7.6%
	Other	34.5%

Wilson	Tuke	42.3%
	Padgett	11.0%
	Eaton	11.3%
	Other	35.4%

National DataGraph for 2008 - Tennessee Results for 2008

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved