Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2016-12-29

Map

Map

Adams	Barrett	42.4%
	Falk	47.4%
	Other	10.2%

Ashland	Barrett	64.0%
	Falk	25.9%
	Other	10.1%

Barron	Barrett	46.9%
	Falk	38.1%
	Other	15.0%

Bayfield	Barrett	64.7%
	Falk	25.5%
	Other	9.9%

Brown	Barrett	49.2%
	Falk	43.9%
	Other	6.9%

Buffalo	Barrett	30.9%
	Falk	34.1%
	Other	35.0%

Burnett	Barrett	57.4%
	Falk	26.5%
	Other	16.1%

Calumet	Barrett	48.6%
	Falk	43.6%
	Other	7.8%

Chippewa	Barrett	51.5%
	Falk	35.1%
	Other	13.4%

Clark	Barrett	39.0%
	Falk	47.0%
	Other	14.0%

Columbia	Barrett	51.4%
	Falk	39.2%
	Other	9.4%

Crawford	Barrett	40.7%
	Falk	46.2%
	Other	13.1%

Dane	Barrett	61.6%
	Falk	30.5%
	Other	7.9%

Dodge	Barrett	55.3%
	Falk	38.2%
	Other	6.5%

Door	Barrett	50.6%
	Falk	40.2%
	Other	9.2%

Douglas	Barrett	66.1%
	Falk	25.4%
	Other	8.5%

Dunn	Barrett	48.8%
	Falk	34.4%
	Other	16.9%

Eau Claire	Barrett	50.4%
	Falk	31.7%
	Other	17.9%

Florence	Barrett	48.8%
	Falk	41.8%
	Other	9.4%

Fond du Lac	Barrett	52.3%
	Falk	40.1%
	Other	7.6%

Forest	Barrett	38.3%
	Falk	51.9%
	Other	9.8%

Grant	Barrett	46.9%
	Falk	44.0%
	Other	9.0%

Green	Barrett	53.3%
	Falk	38.2%
	Other	8.5%

Green Lake	Barrett	48.7%
	Falk	41.9%
	Other	9.4%

Iowa	Barrett	54.4%
	Falk	35.7%
	Other	9.9%

Iron	Barrett	59.1%
	Falk	30.4%
	Other	10.6%

Jackson	Barrett	40.3%
	Falk	32.5%
	Other	27.2%

Jefferson	Barrett	55.7%
	Falk	36.1%
	Other	8.2%

Juneau	Barrett	43.5%
	Falk	47.0%
	Other	9.5%

Kenosha	Barrett	59.1%
	Falk	34.9%
	Other	6.0%

Kewaunee	Barrett	44.6%
	Falk	45.4%
	Other	10.0%

La Crosse	Barrett	47.7%
	Falk	40.7%
	Other	11.5%

Lafayette	Barrett	47.3%
	Falk	43.0%
	Other	9.7%

Langlade	Barrett	43.5%
	Falk	45.7%
	Other	10.8%

Lincoln	Barrett	41.8%
	Falk	47.5%
	Other	10.7%

Manitowoc	Barrett	45.9%
	Falk	45.9%
	Other	8.2%

Marathon	Barrett	47.1%
	Falk	43.0%
	Other	10.0%

Marinette	Barrett	44.2%
	Falk	47.0%
	Other	8.8%

Marquette	Barrett	47.3%
	Falk	42.4%
	Other	10.3%

Menominee	Barrett	41.3%
	Falk	52.4%
	Other	6.2%

Milwaukee	Barrett	72.1%
	Falk	24.5%
	Other	3.4%

Monroe	Barrett	37.7%
	Falk	43.2%
	Other	19.1%

Oconto	Barrett	46.2%
	Falk	45.5%
	Other	8.3%

Oneida	Barrett	44.6%
	Falk	45.8%
	Other	9.5%

Outagamie	Barrett	49.5%
	Falk	42.8%
	Other	7.7%

Ozaukee	Barrett	68.8%
	Falk	26.5%
	Other	4.7%

Pepin	Barrett	33.8%
	Falk	29.8%
	Other	36.4%

Pierce	Barrett	56.3%
	Falk	26.5%
	Other	17.2%

Polk	Barrett	53.5%
	Falk	27.4%
	Other	19.0%

Portage	Barrett	55.0%
	Falk	36.2%
	Other	8.8%

Price	Barrett	43.0%
	Falk	43.9%
	Other	13.2%

Racine	Barrett	60.9%
	Falk	33.2%
	Other	5.9%

Richland	Barrett	48.2%
	Falk	41.2%
	Other	10.6%

Rock	Barrett	50.1%
	Falk	42.2%
	Other	7.7%

Rusk	Barrett	43.3%
	Falk	42.7%
	Other	13.9%

St. Croix	Barrett	56.7%
	Falk	28.9%
	Other	14.5%

Sauk	Barrett	52.6%
	Falk	37.2%
	Other	10.2%

Sawyer	Barrett	52.6%
	Falk	30.3%
	Other	17.1%

Shawano	Barrett	45.8%
	Falk	45.0%
	Other	9.2%

Sheboygan	Barrett	56.6%
	Falk	38.1%
	Other	5.3%

Taylor	Barrett	39.6%
	Falk	47.1%
	Other	13.3%

Trempealeau	Barrett	43.2%
	Falk	35.6%
	Other	21.1%

Vernon	Barrett	46.5%
	Falk	40.8%
	Other	12.7%

Vilas	Barrett	47.5%
	Falk	43.6%
	Other	8.9%

Walworth	Barrett	59.8%
	Falk	33.4%
	Other	6.9%

Washburn	Barrett	61.8%
	Falk	27.1%
	Other	11.1%

Washington	Barrett	65.8%
	Falk	29.0%
	Other	5.2%

Waukesha	Barrett	67.4%
	Falk	28.2%
	Other	4.4%

Waupaca	Barrett	45.2%
	Falk	46.1%
	Other	8.7%

Waushara	Barrett	46.8%
	Falk	45.1%
	Other	8.1%

Winnebago	Barrett	51.7%
	Falk	41.6%
	Other	6.8%

Wood	Barrett	47.8%
	Falk	42.2%
	Other	9.9%

National DataGraph for 2012 - Wisconsin Results for 2012

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved