Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Alamance	Hagan	40.9%
	Tillis	55.0%
		0.0%
	Other	4.1%

Alexander	Hagan	26.0%
	Tillis	66.6%
		0.0%
	Other	7.4%

Alleghany	Hagan	32.4%
	Tillis	59.6%
		0.0%
	Other	8.1%

Anson	Hagan	61.4%
	Tillis	35.1%
		0.0%
	Other	3.5%

Ashe	Hagan	33.9%
	Tillis	59.5%
		0.0%
	Other	6.6%

Avery	Hagan	22.3%
	Tillis	73.1%
		0.0%
	Other	4.7%

Beaufort	Hagan	39.8%
	Tillis	54.8%
		0.0%
	Other	5.4%

Bertie	Hagan	63.0%
	Tillis	34.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Bladen	Hagan	49.7%
	Tillis	44.4%
		0.0%
	Other	5.9%

Brunswick	Hagan	38.5%
	Tillis	56.0%
		0.0%
	Other	5.4%

Buncombe	Hagan	56.9%
	Tillis	39.0%
		0.0%
	Other	4.1%

Burke	Hagan	35.9%
	Tillis	57.7%
		0.0%
	Other	6.5%

Cabarrus	Hagan	38.7%
	Tillis	56.7%
		0.0%
	Other	4.6%

Caldwell	Hagan	29.8%
	Tillis	63.3%
		0.0%
	Other	6.9%

Camden	Hagan	35.6%
	Tillis	61.0%
		0.0%
	Other	3.4%

Carteret	Hagan	29.8%
	Tillis	65.6%
		0.0%
	Other	4.6%

Caswell	Hagan	48.1%
	Tillis	48.8%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Catawba	Hagan	32.4%
	Tillis	62.3%
		0.0%
	Other	5.3%

Chatham	Hagan	54.0%
	Tillis	42.9%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Cherokee	Hagan	28.6%
	Tillis	67.3%
		0.0%
	Other	4.1%

Chowan	Hagan	43.4%
	Tillis	54.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Clay	Hagan	29.3%
	Tillis	66.9%
		0.0%
	Other	3.8%

Cleveland	Hagan	39.3%
	Tillis	55.7%
		0.0%
	Other	5.0%

Columbus	Hagan	46.2%
	Tillis	47.2%
		0.0%
	Other	6.6%

Craven	Hagan	38.9%
	Tillis	57.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.9%

Cumberland	Hagan	56.0%
	Tillis	40.6%
		0.0%
	Other	3.4%

Currituck	Hagan	29.7%
	Tillis	66.8%
		0.0%
	Other	3.5%

Dare	Hagan	40.4%
	Tillis	56.4%
		0.0%
	Other	3.2%

Davidson	Hagan	27.6%
	Tillis	68.1%
		0.0%
	Other	4.4%

Davie	Hagan	27.0%
	Tillis	68.6%
		0.0%
	Other	4.4%

Duplin	Hagan	42.7%
	Tillis	53.5%
		0.0%
	Other	3.7%

Durham	Hagan	76.6%
	Tillis	21.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Edgecombe	Hagan	67.2%
	Tillis	30.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Forsyth	Hagan	51.5%
	Tillis	45.5%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Franklin	Hagan	46.0%
	Tillis	49.2%
		0.0%
	Other	4.9%

Gaston	Hagan	34.8%
	Tillis	60.5%
		0.0%
	Other	4.7%

Gates	Hagan	49.0%
	Tillis	48.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Graham	Hagan	30.0%
	Tillis	61.5%
		0.0%
	Other	8.6%

Granville	Hagan	51.7%
	Tillis	44.8%
		0.0%
	Other	3.5%

Greene	Hagan	46.1%
	Tillis	50.0%
		0.0%
	Other	3.9%

Guilford	Hagan	55.6%
	Tillis	41.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Halifax	Hagan	62.1%
	Tillis	34.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Harnett	Hagan	38.9%
	Tillis	56.8%
		0.0%
	Other	4.2%

Haywood	Hagan	42.8%
	Tillis	51.8%
		0.0%
	Other	5.4%

Henderson	Hagan	36.3%
	Tillis	59.8%
		0.0%
	Other	3.9%

Hertford	Hagan	68.9%
	Tillis	29.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Hoke	Hagan	57.5%
	Tillis	38.7%
		0.0%
	Other	3.8%

Hyde	Hagan	49.9%
	Tillis	44.6%
		0.0%
	Other	5.5%

Iredell	Hagan	32.3%
	Tillis	61.9%
		0.0%
	Other	5.9%

Jackson	Hagan	48.1%
	Tillis	46.6%
		0.0%
	Other	5.3%

Johnston	Hagan	34.5%
	Tillis	61.2%
		0.0%
	Other	4.3%

Jones	Hagan	43.7%
	Tillis	51.2%
		0.0%
	Other	5.1%

Lee	Hagan	44.4%
	Tillis	50.7%
		0.0%
	Other	4.9%

Lenoir	Hagan	49.1%
	Tillis	47.5%
		0.0%
	Other	3.4%

Lincoln	Hagan	28.1%
	Tillis	66.5%
		0.0%
	Other	5.4%

McDowell	Hagan	30.8%
	Tillis	62.6%
		0.0%
	Other	6.6%

Macon	Hagan	36.8%
	Tillis	57.5%
		0.0%
	Other	5.7%

Madison	Hagan	45.8%
	Tillis	47.9%
		0.0%
	Other	6.3%

Martin	Hagan	51.8%
	Tillis	44.3%
		0.0%
	Other	3.9%

Mecklenburg	Hagan	59.2%
	Tillis	38.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Mitchell	Hagan	24.3%
	Tillis	71.3%
		0.0%
	Other	4.4%

Montgomery	Hagan	41.1%
	Tillis	53.3%
		0.0%
	Other	5.6%

Moore	Hagan	34.4%
	Tillis	62.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Nash	Hagan	47.7%
	Tillis	49.3%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

New Hanover	Hagan	47.4%
	Tillis	47.5%
		0.0%
	Other	5.2%

Northampton	Hagan	65.9%
	Tillis	31.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Onslow	Hagan	32.2%
	Tillis	63.0%
		0.0%
	Other	4.9%

Orange	Hagan	73.3%
	Tillis	24.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Pamlico	Hagan	40.5%
	Tillis	55.6%
		0.0%
	Other	3.9%

Pasquotank	Hagan	53.9%
	Tillis	44.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Pender	Hagan	38.5%
	Tillis	55.5%
		0.0%
	Other	6.0%

Perquimans	Hagan	37.3%
	Tillis	60.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Person	Hagan	43.0%
	Tillis	52.6%
		0.0%
	Other	4.4%

Pitt	Hagan	50.1%
	Tillis	46.7%
		0.0%
	Other	3.2%

Polk	Hagan	40.9%
	Tillis	55.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.8%

Randolph	Hagan	22.3%
	Tillis	73.2%
		0.0%
	Other	4.5%

Richmond	Hagan	50.4%
	Tillis	43.8%
		0.0%
	Other	5.8%

Robeson	Hagan	52.9%
	Tillis	43.5%
		0.0%
	Other	3.6%

Rockingham	Hagan	37.5%
	Tillis	56.9%
		0.0%
	Other	5.6%

Rowan	Hagan	34.7%
	Tillis	59.5%
		0.0%
	Other	5.9%

Rutherford	Hagan	34.1%
	Tillis	60.2%
		0.0%
	Other	5.7%

Sampson	Hagan	42.6%
	Tillis	53.4%
		0.0%
	Other	4.0%

Scotland	Hagan	55.7%
	Tillis	41.1%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Stanly	Hagan	28.2%
	Tillis	65.0%
		0.0%
	Other	6.8%

Stokes	Hagan	26.4%
	Tillis	66.9%
		0.0%
	Other	6.7%

Surry	Hagan	30.6%
	Tillis	63.8%
		0.0%
	Other	5.6%

Swain	Hagan	44.9%
	Tillis	46.8%
		0.0%
	Other	8.3%

Transylvania	Hagan	41.8%
	Tillis	53.0%
		0.0%
	Other	5.2%

Tyrrell	Hagan	46.2%
	Tillis	48.0%
		0.0%
	Other	5.8%

Union	Hagan	32.4%
	Tillis	63.8%
		0.0%
	Other	3.8%

Vance	Hagan	60.9%
	Tillis	35.9%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Wake	Hagan	55.2%
	Tillis	41.7%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Warren	Hagan	66.9%
	Tillis	30.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Washington	Hagan	57.5%
	Tillis	38.4%
		0.0%
	Other	4.1%

Watauga	Hagan	46.2%
	Tillis	48.5%
		0.0%
	Other	5.3%

Wayne	Hagan	42.5%
	Tillis	54.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Wilkes	Hagan	26.4%
	Tillis	67.6%
		0.0%
	Other	6.0%

Wilson	Hagan	51.7%
	Tillis	45.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Yadkin	Hagan	20.9%
	Tillis	73.7%
		0.0%
	Other	5.4%

Yancey	Hagan	42.0%
	Tillis	52.8%
		0.0%
	Other	5.2%

National DataGraph for 2014 - North Carolina Results for 2014

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved